Updated with a permitted link.copyright blocked, rip
didn’t expect you to go all the way back and update it, thanks!Updated with a permitted link.
GOODNESS GRACIOUS!
Ramos Vinolas went 3-0 UP in the decider????????????????????????
It could be just a match up problem - finds it hard against lefties on clay. So it may not matter much at later stages... Oh, wait...Can't believe he almost lost to Ramos Vinalos. Future 20+ slam champion my a*s. Nadal in his prime would have absolutely routined this guy 6-1 6-1 6-0.
Connors vs Haarhuis at USO’91 but better and more vital to the victory.Check this point starting at 3:06, truly incredible.
He's no Nadal of course (lol), but even multiple slam champions sometimes won slams after escaping an early round loss, although the examples I can think of involved better players than 34-year-old Albert Ramos.Can't believe he almost lost to Ramos Vinalos. Future 20+ slam champion my a*s. Nadal in his prime would have absolutely routined this guy 6-1 6-1 6-0.
Nadal 2010 Wimby was down 2-1 to Haase and PetzschnerHe's no Nadal of course (lol), but even multiple slam champions sometimes won slams after escaping an early round loss, although the examples I can think of involved better players than 34-year-old Albert Ramos.
Nadal at first week Wimbledon is like the least upset resistant top player in the history of tennis lol. Well maybe a little better than Pete at RG. Wouldn’t say those were surprises.Nadal 2010 Wimby was down 2-1 to Haase and Petzschner
Fits right in with how he served for the match in the 4thRamos Vinolas went 3-0 UP in the decider????????????????????????
I agree post-2010. But he was extremely consistent at Wimby from 06-10Nadal at first week Wimbledon is like the least upset resistant top player in the history of tennis lol. Well maybe a little better than Pete at RG. Wouldn’t say those were surprises.
Nadal on first week Wimbledon grass is a special case just due to how incredibly prone to upset he is there compared to most other top players at any Slam tournament. Even in his best years he was going 4/5 vs. a bunch of players in the first week.Nadal 2010 Wimby was down 2-1 to Haase and Petzschner
Wait what? He went 2 sets down to Kendrick in 06, Youzhny in 2007, even had a hairy match with Gulbis in 08.I agree post-2010. But he was extremely consistent at Wimby from 06-10
Ok, then how about Djokovic at last year’s RG? Down 2-0 to Musetti and 2-0 to Tsitsipas but won itNadal on first week Wimbledon grass is a special case just due to how incredibly prone to upset he is there compared to most other top players at any Slam tournament. Even in his best years he was going 4/5 vs. a bunch of players in the first week.
Among ATGs it has to be Wilander at Wimbledon, and in general too, was no stranger to an early round scrappy fight but kept surviving.Nadal at first week Wimbledon is like the least upset resistant top player in the history of tennis lol. Well maybe a little better than Pete at RG. Wouldn’t say those were surprises.
I recall them playing better than Ramos did tbh. Especially Haase served from a tree although Nadal's return position helped a good deal. Of course that serve then completely disappeared in the last two sets.Nadal 2010 Wimby was down 2-1 to Haase and Petzschner
Good point, and of course former #1s in Roddick at RG, Muster at Wimby are also far more upset prone if maybe not ATGs.Among ATGs it has to be Wilander at Wimbledon, and in general too, was no stranger to an early round scrappy fight but kept surviving.
In a specific period it's obviously PETE at RG post-1996, totally phoned it in there. I mean he tried to win but his attempts were hella lame.
That was even better, Connors hitting a winner after saving 4 overheads.Connors vs Haarhuis at USO’91 but better and more vital to the victory.
Only a "little better"?Nadal at first week Wimbledon is like the least upset resistant top player in the history of tennis lol. Well maybe a little better than Pete at RG. Wouldn’t say those were surprises.
That's what I call an iconic, legendary moment.That was even better, Connors hitting a winner after saving 4 overheads.
It hasn't gotten more iconic then that at US OpenThat's what I call an iconic, legendary moment.
![]()
could be summarized as "Alcaraz hitting weak backhands: the match"GOODNESS GRACIOUS!
Ramos Vinolas went 3-0 UP in the decider????????????????????????