A. Zverev has way more potential than Alcaraz

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don’t believe you. Alcaraz is a sub 6’ midget. Show me a picture of Alcaraz standing next to Nadal or another player to prove it.
FPrv-P9x-X0-AYU6-Q.jpg
 
I know that this thread is made in jest, but I was literally thinking after today's semi how mental strength is talent too and there's a limit on how much one can improve it. Zverev is 24 already, with big achievements and wins to his name and a team of professionals behind him, and yet he can't keep up mentally with the increase of pressure, which makes me doubt that this problem can be fixed beyond what we already see - he is able to handle high pressure intermittently when the stakes are not too high.

Since almost everything Zverev has in physical talent gets canceled out the moment he mentally checks out, Alcaraz's ability to keep his cool under pressure easily trumps the centimeters of height that Zverev has on the youngster.

I'm not sure what makes people think that.

Zverev is 4-3 against Federer, 4-7 against Djokovic, has won 2 YEC's, an Olympic Gold, beaten Djokovic or Federer in a combined 4 big title finals and many more SF's, and consistently performs at slams nowadays....

and people think he cannot keep up with the pressure?

You don't beat the Big 3 that regularly if you cannot handle pressure.
 
Fed is a good two inches taller. Alcaraz must have been measured with some seriously stiff hair product.
The only explanation I can present is that Alcaraz has grown an inch or two if he really is 6ft1. This photo dates back to 2019, so we could do with a somewhat recent photo of him.
 
Because he's much taller. It's as simple as that.

Height is a talent. Being tall = being physically talented.

Zverev can pretty much just lean over the net from the baseline and spike serves straight downwards whereas Alcaraz has to serve low percentage acute angles.

Zverev can pretty much cover the baseline in one stride whereas Alcaraz has to sprint.

Zverev has a mile-long lever arm to pummel high velocity strokes with whereas Alcaraz has to work much harder to generate pace with his little T-Rex arms.

The only issue Zverev has is mental (which can be fixed) whereas Alcaraz cannot 'train' to grow taller and therefore become a more talented athlete (remember taller athletes are physically more talented by definition).
Alcaraz can probably grow another 3-5 cms if we're taking biology right to the book
 
Yes I agree, I've always thought of all the young guys (young being below the age of Thiem), Zverev is the one most likely to win a slam. That hasn't changed even now.

The problem is that everyone on this forum hates Zverev. So you won't get an honest answer from anyone here. There were Zverev fans around last year, but they all seem to have disappeared.
I don't hate zverev. I've always maintained that he possesses a much higher peak level in the current generation of 23-28 yo players.
 
Why do people think that Alcaraz is so much mentally tougher than other next gen players? He already lost multiple matches were he only needed to keep his serve in order to win and lost a set from 5-0 up. His height is another issue, but that doesn't stop him from becoming GS champion. GOAT status seems out of the question without those extra inches though.
 
Because he's much taller. It's as simple as that.

Height is a talent. Being tall = being physically talented.

Zverev can pretty much just lean over the net from the baseline and spike serves straight downwards whereas Alcaraz has to serve low percentage acute angles.

Zverev can pretty much cover the baseline in one stride whereas Alcaraz has to sprint.

Zverev has a mile-long lever arm to pummel high velocity strokes with whereas Alcaraz has to work much harder to generate pace with his little T-Rex arms.

The only issue Zverev has is mental (which can be fixed) whereas Alcaraz cannot 'train' to grow taller and therefore become a more talented athlete (remember taller athletes are physically more talented by definition).
But... Zverev is clumsy compared to Alcarez!
 
I'm not sure what makes people think that.

Zverev is 4-3 against Federer, 4-7 against Djokovic, has won 2 YEC's, an Olympic Gold, beaten Djokovic or Federer in a combined 4 big title finals and many more SF's, and consistently performs at slams nowadays....

and people think he cannot keep up with the pressure?

You don't beat the Big 3 that regularly if you cannot handle pressure.
I'm not talking about complete lack of mental strength, of course. Zverev does have big achievements and wins, just now he was pretty close to becoming the world #1, but these results are the reflection of Zverev's top level, which we know is great when his game is clicking and he is feeling confident. The issue is, his game can't always click, and in important matches when the pressure is already high, quite often Zverev fails to handle it properly when he starts struggling gamewise. His level either drops off a cliff or just stays at the bottom, depending on how he started. As I said, Zverev can hold under pressure, but problem one - it happens sporadically and he doesn't seem to have much control over his own reaction, and problem two - he's getting worse as the expectations grow.

My theory is that he has more anxiety than normal in general, and probably has fear of underperforming on his mind more often than strictly necessary, which adds more stress to the pressure of actual matches. If you're rooting for Zverev (as I frustratingly have been since the last year's USO :X3:), you gotta be prepared for him to crumble at some point.
 
I'm not sure what makes people think that.

Zverev is 4-3 against Federer, 4-7 against Djokovic, has won 2 YEC's, an Olympic Gold, beaten Djokovic or Federer in a combined 4 big title finals and many more SF's, and consistently performs at slams nowadays....

and people think he cannot keep up with the pressure?

You don't beat the Big 3 that regularly if you cannot handle pressure.
Yet he still hasn't been able to beat a top10 at a slam.
 
I'm not talking about complete lack of mental strength, of course. Zverev does have big achievements and wins, just now he was pretty close to becoming the world #1, but these results are the reflection of Zverev's top level, which we know is great when his game is clicking and he is feeling confident. The issue is, his game can't always click, and in important matches when the pressure is already high, quite often Zverev fails to handle it properly when he starts struggling gamewise. His level either drops off a cliff or just stays at the bottom, depending on how he started. As I said, Zverev can hold under pressure, but problem one - it happens sporadically and he doesn't seem to have much control over his own reaction, and problem two - he's getting worse as the expectations grow.

My theory is that he has more anxiety than normal in general, and probably has fear of underperforming on his mind more often than strictly necessary, which adds more stress to the pressure of actual matches. If you're rooting for Zverev (as I frustratingly have been since the last year's USO :X3:), you gotta be prepared for him to crumble at some point.

I have a completely different feel tbh.

Zverev is a narcissist who feels much less pressure than most.

This man went around destroying tournaments and bullying Nadal while he was heavily accused and rRothenberg came out with the reports...

it never even once bothered his on-court game cause he just does, not, care. He's a narcissist.

Everyone else would have crumbled under those allegations.

He continously played the best tennis of his life.
 
I have a completely different feel tbh.

Zverev is a narcissist who feels much less pressure than most.

This man went around destroying tournaments and bullying Nadal while he was heavily accused and rRothenberg came out with the reports...

it never even once bothered his on-court game cause he just does, not, care. He's a narcissist.

Everyone else would have crumbled under those allegations.

He continously played the best tennis of his life.
If Zverev feels less pressure than most, why do you think he falters so often under pressure? I'm genuinely curious
 
Zverev practically speaking might not have much longer levers as he hits with a bent-arm while Carlos hits with a straight arm. Not to mention the technique difference represents talent as Zverev can never close that gap of how much more natural Alcaraz's strokes are.
 
I don’t believe you. Alcaraz is a sub 6’ midget. Show me a picture of Alcaraz standing next to Nadal or another player to prove it.
Alcaraz may b 6ft or a bit less, but he has more natural and acquired talent than: Berrettini, Zverev, Medvedev and others over 6ft-2 and above. If I recall correctly be beat Medvedev 3-3 and 3 this Wimbledon as well as Berrettini with a different scoreline. Height does NOT definitely equal talent when it comes to tennis.
 
Because he's much taller. It's as simple as that.

Height is a talent. Being tall = being physically talented.

Zverev can pretty much just lean over the net from the baseline and spike serves straight downwards whereas Alcaraz has to serve low percentage acute angles.

Zverev can pretty much cover the baseline in one stride whereas Alcaraz has to sprint.

Zverev has a mile-long lever arm to pummel high velocity strokes with whereas Alcaraz has to work much harder to generate pace with his little T-Rex arms.

The only issue Zverev has is mental (which can be fixed) whereas Alcaraz cannot 'train' to grow taller and therefore become a more talented athlete (remember taller athletes are physically more talented by definition).
Zverev and Tsitsipas would be GS champions by now if they had the same mental strength as Carlitos. Zverev is very mobile for a 6’6” guy but is not in the same class as Carlitos.
 
Zverev and Tsitsipas would be GS champions by now if they had the same mental strength as Carlitos. Zverev is very mobile for a 6’6” guy but is not in the same class as Carlitos.
Zverev does not serve better than Carlos, does not move as well, does not volley as well have better ground strokes or have all court strategy that Carlos has.
 
Zverev does not serve better than Carlos, does not move as well, does not volley as well have better ground strokes or have all court strategy that Carlos has.
If Alcaraz would have Zverev’s first Serve and his BH, Alcaraz would be an even better player.

However, Zverev is inferior in other aspects.
 
There hasn't been anyone over 6'4" who has dominated. The sweet spot seems to be 6"1-6'3". You're totally correct on paper. One would think the extra height (assuming it doesn't hurt mobility) would be a huge advantage. It's just never worked out that way.
Potentially even 5'11-6'3 if you include McEnroe and Agassi.
 
Alcaraz has improved his serve immensely. It's actually a weapon now, not a liability. For a sub 6' guy, hitting consistently in the 120s and can reach the 130s, that's impressive.

Oh I agree that Alcaraz has improved his Serve. However, I still think Zverev's first Serve can be in the 135-140 at his fastest which can make a difference vs in the 120s.

Of course it's all about placement as well.
 
Alcaraz is overrated.
NOT SO! Until some of the under thirty-year-old players start beating him on a regular basis, he is the best of that group of players. Also, it looks like Carlos will be number one for some time unless Novak has a good summer in the US, where he has no points to defend.
 
This thread did not age well.

There is a lot to be said about desire, heart, and the will to win. Sasha is still trying to find that within himself. Whereas if you watch Alcaraz, it is as if he is already there. That's the big difference. Physical specimen is one, but you've got to have the drive to succeed. Zion Williamson is a perfect example in the NBA.
 
Potentially even 5'11-6'3 if you include McEnroe and Agassi.
Yeah. Good point. However, I actually think Agassi's lack of that little extra height stopped him from being even better. The exact same Andre, but who's magically 6'1", is so much more dangerous, I contend. Especially against someone like Pete. He simply gets to more balls on, say, the return.

(Pre 1990 I don't know enough about so I won't comment on Mac.)
 
Because he's much taller. It's as simple as that.

Height is a talent. Being tall = being physically talented.

Zverev can pretty much just lean over the net from the baseline and spike serves straight downwards whereas Alcaraz has to serve low percentage acute angles.

Zverev can pretty much cover the baseline in one stride whereas Alcaraz has to sprint.

Zverev has a mile-long lever arm to pummel high velocity strokes with whereas Alcaraz has to work much harder to generate pace with his little T-Rex arms.

The only issue Zverev has is mental (which can be fixed) whereas Alcaraz cannot 'train' to grow taller and therefore become a more talented athlete (remember taller athletes are physically more talented by definition).
:-D:giggle::laughing:
 
Let's bump this for fun..
Alive and kicking and I am only going to DOUBLE DOWN on what I initially said.

Alcaraz is the most overrated player of all time, and Zverev is only one sports psych sesh away from winning 30 Slams. You can't deny that height talent.

Wake me up when Alcaraz has won 25+ Slams, until then he's just a hype-job and hasn't achieved anything remarkable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top