ForehandCross
G.O.A.T.
First let's not deny three things : 1.Nadal on RG always finds a way , even if he had lost second set, he was likelier to win 2. This was the worst late stage RG Nadal . 3. Z really had a chance.
Poor Zverev probably would not have won, but there was a genuine chance for him simply because Nadal was fading physically, Nadal was starting to miss 1st serves by 5-6 feets in the last few games of the second set. This was Nadal's worst level at RG I have seen in deeper stage.
But paradoxically, Z is only one of the few guys on tour who could actually expose this poor form , anyone else it would be a usual 3-4 setter . Only because Z's game matches well with Nadal's, he can rally all day, hit big off both wings and his BH doesn't care for Rafa's FH.
Nadal has so many layers to his game on clay that even he is playing bad you can't really have the upper hand continuously for 3 sets.
Poor Zverev probably would not have won, but there was a genuine chance for him simply because Nadal was fading physically, Nadal was starting to miss 1st serves by 5-6 feets in the last few games of the second set. This was Nadal's worst level at RG I have seen in deeper stage.
But paradoxically, Z is only one of the few guys on tour who could actually expose this poor form , anyone else it would be a usual 3-4 setter . Only because Z's game matches well with Nadal's, he can rally all day, hit big off both wings and his BH doesn't care for Rafa's FH.
Nadal has so many layers to his game on clay that even he is playing bad you can't really have the upper hand continuously for 3 sets.
Last edited: