Absurd day of tennis has negative repercussions for the women's final which will now be delayed

Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by Aussie Darcy, Jul 13, 2018.

  1. Aussie Darcy

    Aussie Darcy Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    25,396
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Gotta admit that this is pretty poor.

    Because of the annoying Wimbledon rule of no play after 11PM and the crazy long Anderson/Isner match, Djokovic v Nadal had to be suspended at the start of the 4th set. The organizers have decided to schedule the match to resume at 1PM tomorrow which is BEFORE the women's final at 2PM. Considering how long the sets have been between these two players, it is highly likely that the women's final will now be delayed. Not only will it be delayed, the women will have to wait around, potentially for hours for the men to finish playing which is definitely unprecedented in recent years for a slam final.

    Say what you want about women's tennis (i'm sure there'll be a lot of negative comments here), but can you imagine how you would feel if the men's final was to be indefinitely delayed because of a women's match? People would go crazy.

    To make matters worse, earlier in the tournament, organizers were adamant that the timing of the men's final wouldn't be changed if England made the World Cup final so many are asking why the women's time slot is ok to be amended but not the men's.

    Kerber and Serena are set to play one of their biggest matches of their career (Kerber going for slam #3 and Serena looking to equal Court's record of 24 slams). But instead of knowing when their match will start, they potentially could sit around for hours (if the match is anything like the Anderson/Isner match, they could be waiting for a long, long time).
     
    EloQuent, Jackuar, McEncock and 19 others like this.
    #1
  2. Aussie Darcy

    Aussie Darcy Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    25,396
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    This problem could've been easily solved by organizing the men to play after the ladies final which also would've given them more time to rest..

    It's not the women's fault that Isner/Anderson play such boring servebot tennis.
     
    SQA333, DRII, randomtoss and 14 others like this.
    #2
  3. AlexanderTheGreat08

    AlexanderTheGreat08 Professional

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2018
    Messages:
    1,240
    Women’s tennis without Camila Giorgi? Naaa give me Isner-Anderson again
     
    #3
  4. jm1980

    jm1980 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    12,688
    This is because the winner still has another match to play on Sunday.

    It doesn't make sense for the men to finish their semi after the women's final, which has the same potential to last a very long time with no final set TB
     
    imonfire, abmk, Steve0904 and 13 others like this.
    #4
  5. vex

    vex Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2017
    Messages:
    1,397
    Maybe, just maybe this “Uber prestigious” tournament which 1) has been scheduled by morons all the way thru; 2) caters to servebot play styles on a surface with no season to support it and 3) has this dumb no 5th set TB nonsense... maybe it’s just an overrated tourney

    AO knows how to run a tourney
     
    #5
  6. Deon Sanders

    Deon Sanders Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2017
    Messages:
    1,849
    Location:
    Flyover Country
    They can thank Isner and Anderson for making the event enough money to pay them the same for doing 3/5ths of the work
     
    #6
  7. Aussie Darcy

    Aussie Darcy Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    25,396
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    That's not the ladies fault that Anderson v Isner were unable to break eachothers serve. Instead the women have to wait around on one of the biggest matches of their career for a match that could also go a very long time with no final set TB.
     
    #7
  8. Aussie Darcy

    Aussie Darcy Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    25,396
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    LMAO. Pretty sure Serena Williams brings in far more money for Wimbledon than John Isner or Kevin Anderson. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

    Bad trolling.
     
    Sysyphus, randomtoss, Liam and 11 others like this.
    #8
  9. jm1980

    jm1980 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    12,688
    Neither is it Djokovic or Nadal's fault

    They have already played 3 sets. Barring something exceptional, they should be finished in another 90 minutes at the most.
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2018
    #9
  10. vex

    vex Professional

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2017
    Messages:
    1,397
    Uh.... not sure if serious.... lol if serious
     
    #10
  11. Rafa24

    Rafa24 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,142
    yeah if he would be talking about fed/nadal/djoker he'd have a point.
     
    #11
  12. Aussie Darcy

    Aussie Darcy Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    25,396
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    I didn't say it was their fault, but it's their tour. The organizers refused to move the men's final if England made the World Cup final but the women's final can easily be delayed because of something that has nothing to do with them?
    Also 90 minutes would still see them delayed and besides, I think it'd be longer then that as:
    Set 1 was 48 minutes
    Set 2 was 53 minutes
    Set 3 was an 1 hour and 15 minutes.

    Likely to go 5 sets and let's say an hour each, that's 2 hours already. Then there's still more delays for the winner to do an on court interviews, head off court and the women to come out.. It's not exactly great.
     
    #12
  13. jm1980

    jm1980 G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2011
    Messages:
    12,688
    Well, that's a moot point because England did not make the final

    The bottom line is, someone would be inconvenienced here. I think doing it this way is better, because the ladies don't have to worry about having to play another match, like Nadal and Djokovic did today.
     
    ktwtfd, Cenarius and sredna42 like this.
    #13
  14. sredna42

    sredna42 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2018
    Messages:
    621
    Location:
    Australia
    For starters, is it djoker/nada's fault that their match was delayed? And now they're having to endure this?
    And also, it is standard procedure to finish a match that has already started.
    Going by historical tickets sales, the ATP final generally makes more money than the WTA final.
    Grigor Dimitrov's 1st round loss probably had more interest even, LOL.
    Only a biased fanboy wold think otherwise.
    The real bias is against the men, being forced to play 5 set marathons then back it up.
     
    VaporDude95 likes this.
    #14
  15. zverev2018

    zverev2018 Rookie

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2018
    Messages:
    257
    Nadal & Djokovic will play until 45-43 in the final set and the women’s final will be postponed until monday. Lol
     
    Johnr and Nadalgaenger like this.
    #15
  16. Rafa24

    Rafa24 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Messages:
    2,142
    maybe they will start at 10pm and have to quit at 11.
     
    zverev2018 likes this.
    #16
  17. Aussie Darcy

    Aussie Darcy Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    25,396
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Actually, throughout this tournament standard procedure has been mixed. Some continuing matches were scheduled after other matches (which hadn't started) were to play. Note how Seppi v Anderson was suspended on Court 2 on day 3 and resumed SECOND on court 2 on day 4 after Boulter v Osaka. Fabbiano v Stan was suspended on court 3 on day 3 and resumed SECOND on court 3 on day 4 after Bouchard v Barty.

    And super cute trying to act like 23x slam champ Serena Williams v 2x slam champ Angelique Kerber won't have much interest. Probably will be more interesting than the men's final will end up being with a dead tired Anderson v Nadal/Djokovic. Not like the ATP is getting a Fedal final or Murray v Djokovic. It's the 'almighty' Anderson in the final. :rolleyes:
     
    randomtoss likes this.
    #17
  18. Service Ace

    Service Ace Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2007
    Messages:
    2,520
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    [​IMG]
     
    #18
  19. reaper

    reaper Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2012
    Messages:
    5,017
    To be fair it's the guys carrying this tournament so far. There is something worse than 7-6 6-7 6-7 6-4 26-24. That's 6-3 6-3.
     
    #19
  20. Meles

    Meles Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    May 23, 2014
    Messages:
    38,181
    Location:
    Milan Draw Party
    Good thread. Well this time they could have put it after the ladies final because Anderson is likely a dead duck in the final given how much he's played in his last two matches.

    But that's not how things are done. If weather had delayed the matches and Fed was awaiting fresh in the final, well then its pretty obvious the ladies final should face some delay. If the match goes into a fifth they'll push the start back an hour or so. Now if we have another long fifth then it makes the problem worse.

    The way to fix this is put the Men's final on Saturday and reverse the situation. And of course Men's final on Saturday is a crazy idea because of best of 5 vs best of 3.
     
    #20
  21. Mack-2

    Mack-2 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    761
    They should have put on the ladies final first so Djoko or Nadal won’t get that much rest for the final. Anderson may actually have a chance of winning more than 4 games in one set if they scheduled it that way.
     
    Alba Barragan likes this.
    #21
  22. Aussie Darcy

    Aussie Darcy Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    25,396
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    I disagree. I watched 3 sets of that Isner/Anderson nonsense and was bored out of my brain and the majority of comments i've read said that "just cause a match is long does not make it high quality". 6-3 6-3 can still be very good with exceptional points and rallies. Anderson/Isner had like, 1 break of serve all match? lmao.
     
    #22
  23. Mack-2

    Mack-2 Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    761
    It was actually like 6 breaks of serve I believe. 2 to Isner and 4 to Anderson.
     
    Zeref likes this.
    #23
  24. tennisaddict

    tennisaddict Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Messages:
    29,749
    Wonder if OP remembers how Vesnina and Kuznetsova played a boring 3.5 hour match and pushed Fed-Stan match at IW 2017

    Also there have been instances at majors where men's matches have got delayed to account for delayed women's matches

    Nothing to see here
     
    #24
  25. Aussie Darcy

    Aussie Darcy Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    25,396
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    The way to fix this would be to edit a whole bunch of Wimbledon's stupid traditions such as: no play after 11PM, no play on middle Sunday, etc.
     
    hugobosstachini, ak24alive and Fugazi like this.
    #25
  26. Spencer Gore

    Spencer Gore Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2017
    Messages:
    685
    Location:
    London
    There is no other way to organize it. Hopefully, going forward, they’ll do something about the last set tie-break but this year’s tournament is officially a farce.
     
    Fugazi likes this.
    #26
  27. Aussie Darcy

    Aussie Darcy Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    25,396
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Wonder if you can read because my original post said:
    Slam final. Not Masters 1000 and not early round of a slam. Please reread my posts next time, thanks.
     
    #27
  28. reaper

    reaper Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2012
    Messages:
    5,017
    Anderson/Isner had 5 breaks in a set and a half from halfway through the 3rd to the end of the 4th. In the 3rd set tie break 9 of 20 points went against the server. It was one of the great tie breaks ever played. The first 3 sets took an hour each, which doesn't happen on grass if they're just servebotting. I can't vouch for the 5th, but the rest of that match was fine. I'm not a particular critic of women's tennis, but all the boosterism in the world can't change how tame their semis have been.
     
    #28
  29. tennisaddict

    tennisaddict Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2009
    Messages:
    29,749
    WTA should ask ITF to split their tour if they want their schedule to be frozen
     
    #29
  30. justasport

    justasport Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2017
    Messages:
    788
    I can tell everybody real quick how to solve this problem. PLAY A DAMN TIEBREAKER AT 6-6 IN THE DAMN FIFTH FRICKING SET!!!!!!!!!!! STUPID IDIOT RULE MUST BE FRICKING CHANGED!!!!
     
    #30
  31. reaper

    reaper Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2012
    Messages:
    5,017
    They'll change the rule, but hopefully not to 6-6. The Federer/Anderson match was better for being an advantage set in the 5th, but there does come a time when it's too long. They should keep the principle of advantage set but with a limit, either 12-12 or 15-15.
     
    parvasedpotens and helterskelter like this.
    #31
  32. metsman

    metsman G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2015
    Messages:
    14,222
    well this ruins my Saturday plans, don't know what I'll do now that the women's final is played at IDGAF oclock instead of IDGAF oclock, ROFLMAO
     
    #32
  33. AggieJason

    AggieJason Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2017
    Messages:
    186
    Location:
    Amarillo,TX
    AMEN HALLELUJAH!!!!
     
    #33
  34. clout

    clout Professional

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2017
    Messages:
    1,234
    Lol Serena's gonna win even if she plays her C/D game (she's been doing that against her swiss cheese competition since 2010). Plus if you ask several tennis fans whether they'd watch a semifinals match between two of the greatest players we've ever seen and will ever get to see continue their epic match or a predictable and likely dry WTA finals with Serena once again winning with her eyes closed. I'm sure 99.9% of fans will pick the first option.
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2018
    Steve0904 likes this.
    #34
  35. loosegroove

    loosegroove Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    May 18, 2010
    Messages:
    1,836
    As irritating as it is may be for the women, I don't understand why people are crying foul. How unfair would it be for Djokovic or Nadal to have to play the final on Sunday after ending a late match on Saturday AFTER a long women's final? It's bad enough for them that they don't get a full day's rest, while Anderson does. Why exacerbate the issue? Serena and Kerber are at least on equal footing, though they may be sitting around for a bit. But that's true for many matches, unless you're the first match of the day, so it's not out of the ordinary for a big match. How frickin long were Djokovic and Nadal sitting around today waiting to get on the court for their big semifinal encounter? I guess they could let the women play on Centre court at the scheduled time and let the men finish on Court 1, but I don't think that would be so nice for the attendance of the women's final, nor would it be that fair to the fans.

    And as far as people bringing up the World Cup, sorry but that's just plain ridiculous. You're comparing scheduling two matches that are occurring in the SAME sport in the SAME tournament, to scheduling a tennis match around a completely unrelated football game. Let's please speak out about real injustices in the world, not the "sexism" that is occurring in Wimbledon. Sure, the scheduling may be crap, but it's shafting Djokovic and Nadal, more than it is Serena and Kerber. Let's keep things in perspective.
     
    #35
  36. Chadillac

    Chadillac Legend

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2015
    Messages:
    9,239
    Location:
    Banned
    The womens final wont be easy on the eye after watching two of the greatest men finish the most important match on that day. The quality of tennis will be like 1/10th.

    I agree with op, they should put it on after the womens final, its the main event
     
    #36
  37. Shaolin

    Shaolin G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    10,842
    Location:
    Virgo Supercluster
    God forbid the world having to wait an extra hour or two for Serena's 6-2, 6-2 beating of Kerber.
     
    #37
  38. 70後

    70後 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2013
    Messages:
    3,796
    This is the obvious reasonable solution. That way we can reduce the damage as far as possible. If we put the sf after the wf, then at least the wf is not affected.

    But in any case, everybody and everything is screwed, Angie and Serena are screwed, Kevin is screwed, Rafa and Novak are screwed, the spectators are screwed, the women's final, the mens semi final, the mens final, everything.
     
    Last edited: Jul 13, 2018
    randomtoss and Vanhool like this.
    #38
  39. VaporDude95

    VaporDude95 Hall of Fame

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    Messages:
    3,458
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    Basically this lol

    End of thread.
     
    #39
  40. Sentinel

    Sentinel Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    53,032
    Location:
    Casing Crusty's house
    So you mean it makes sense for the women to wait interminably ?
    Not getting your logic. I felt the women should be first.

    I understand your part that the men will get 2 hours more to rest for the final, but apart from that the W final could get delayed a lot, although i don;t think these 2 will go into a long 5th set.

    But yeah, if the W final is first then the semi doesn't start straight away, there will be the ceremonies and speeches and what not. You don't want to hurry that up for another big match, I guess. But on the other hand, the royalty now don't know when the final starts. Duke and Duchess of Kent I mean. The younger ones will probably be happy to sit through the men's semi.
     
    jm1980 likes this.
    #40
  41. BeatlesFan

    BeatlesFan G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2015
    Messages:
    13,049
    Location:
    California
    Nobody cares. Who even knows who is in the women's final? It's not like Martina playing Chrissie or Graf playing Sabatini or Seles. Let these women wait. We all had to wait 26 hours before Andergiraffe and Big John were done with their tedious serve-fest. And that will be 100 times more palatable than any women's match.
     
    #41
  42. reaper

    reaper Legend

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2012
    Messages:
    5,017
    The women's match is considered the main match so is played last. The Djokovic/Nadal semi was considered the main match yesterday so was the later match. Tennis players have spent their entire lives sitting around waiting on uncertain start times so you'd think it's a non issue for the players...at least in terms of affecting their performance.
     
    Clay lover and Sentinel like this.
    #42
  43. Aussie Darcy

    Aussie Darcy Talk Tennis Guru

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2015
    Messages:
    25,396
    Location:
    Brisbane, Australia
    Just one of the most recognizable names in tennis, Serena Williams vs a player who got to #1 2 years ago by beating Serena in the Australian Open final as well as winning the US Open and losing the Wimbledon final to Serena. Seriously, how ignorant do you have to be to not know that? :rolleyes:
    It's not like it's Giorgi v Goerges. This is an epic final.
     
    #43
  44. Sentinel

    Sentinel Bionic Poster

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2008
    Messages:
    53,032
    Location:
    Casing Crusty's house
    A tiebreak often just comes down to one point. Happened in the first semi a couple times if i recall. Not good enough for a final set.
     
    randomtoss likes this.
    #44
  45. Firstservingman

    Firstservingman G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2014
    Messages:
    18,724
    Location:
    Canberra, Australia
    No way, gimme the rest of that match as soon as possible thanks. Match of the tournament and probably one of the most important matches in years.

    Way too often the men are kept waiting by WTA matches going overtime because one of the players loses the plot in the second set.
     
    #45
  46. helterskelter

    helterskelter Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2013
    Messages:
    5,721
    Your first paragraph is the norm: they try to schedule a holdover match second (presumably to allow the players to rest from the night before). All the more reason to do this when the match was held over at 11 p.m. I think it was fine to give Nadal/Djokovic the choice, but they should have told them it was between starting at 11 a.m. and being after the women. Not 1 p.m. The least they could now do is delay the official women's start time and make it "not before 4 p.m."

    By the way, you didn't mention this, but there is also a good chance that the women's doubles final will now be shunted to court 1. Not the men's doubles final, though.
     
    randomtoss and Vanhool like this.
    #46
  47. Jimbud

    Jimbud Semi-Pro

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2013
    Messages:
    466
    Location:
    Connecticut
    Wouldn’t the easier solution be to simply resume the men’s match at 11, 1130 or noon? Not a perfect solution but I see the unfairness. Don’t think you can make the men finish Saturday night and turn around for a Sunday final given how physical the match has been, however.
     
    Vanhool likes this.
    #47
  48. helterskelter

    helterskelter Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2013
    Messages:
    5,721
    He really is, isn't he? Well, at the least, he says some really stupid things, because he's so insular, narrow-minded, and uninterested in anything to which he is unaccustomed. My guess is he leads a very narrow life and everything outside it scares him so his reaction is to force himself to think there must be something wrong with it as a coping mechanism to hide his deep fear of it.
     
    Service Ace and ak24alive like this.
    #48
  49. helterskelter

    helterskelter Legend

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2013
    Messages:
    5,721
    Six breaks of serve: four to Anderson, two to Isner. Two breaks in set three, three breaks (!) in set four, and one in set five. On the first two occasions Anderson broke, he got a bit tight and handed the break straight back. To be fair to Anderson, I don't think he's nearly as much of a serve bot as is Isner. It's just that Isner's serve is really, really hard to break. Had Anderson not got nervous at inopportune moments - remember that he'd lost five straight times to Isner, including two losses of two tiebreak sets to one - I think he was generally playing significantly enough better to make a four-set win the likely outcome.
     
    ak24alive likes this.
    #49
  50. Firstservingman

    Firstservingman G.O.A.T.

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2014
    Messages:
    18,724
    Location:
    Canberra, Australia
    :D
     
    Zeref and VaporDude95 like this.
    #50

Share This Page