Abudhabi tennis review

Heres my expert opinion on the exhibition.
1. Soderling and Berdych are in same league. Both are ball bashers with huge serves. However they dont have that killer shot to beat Nadal.
Both are clearly a notch below Nadal and Fed.

2. Nadal and Fed. Both are equal in most aspects. Fed is definately better at volleys. His forehand is also the best. However Nadal has more consistent forehand.
Feds backhand today was ripping. His crosscourt backhand gave Nadal more trouble than any other shot.
Was surprised at low net clearance of both players. Nadal Definitely has flattened his shots.
Nadals serve has also improved , though on breakpoints he always predictably goes for the slice/spin serve.

Fed also trying different returns on serve. Sometimes rushing the second serve, sometimes standing beyond the baseline. Me thinks the latter worked.
As much as people emphasise Nadals spin generated, its on valid for his forehand and for shots he gets into good position. During rallies, fed's forehand, backhand ,volleys , obviosly had a lot more spin than Nadals. His forehand is remarkable for the spin, low clearance , depth and pace it generates.


Also Federer is more sublime, fluid and artistic. I can see hi playing into his forties.
Nadal is brute raw power and speed. He may be on top for next 2-3 years, however if he slows even a single step i think its the end of the road for him.

Overall both players equally matched.
 
Heres my expert opinion on the exhibition.
1. Soderling and Berdych are in same league. Both are ball bashers with huge serves. However they dont have that killer shot to beat Nadal.
Both are clearly a notch below Nadal and Fed.

2. Nadal and Fed. Both are equal in most aspects. Fed is definately better at volleys. His forehand is also the best. However Nadal has more consistent forehand.
Feds backhand today was ripping. His crosscourt backhand gave Nadal more trouble than any other shot.
Was surprised at low net clearance of both players. Nadal Definitely has flattened his shots.
Nadals serve has also improved , though on breakpoints he always predictably goes for the slice/spin serve.

Fed also trying different returns on serve. Sometimes rushing the second serve, sometimes standing beyond the baseline. Me thinks the latter worked.
As much as people emphasise Nadals spin generated, its on valid for his forehand and for shots he gets into good position. During rallies, fed's forehand, backhand ,volleys , obviosly had a lot more spin than Nadals. His forehand is remarkable for the spin, low clearance , depth and pace it generates.


Also Federer is more sublime, fluid and artistic. I can see hi playing into his forties.
Nadal is brute raw power and speed. He may be on top for next 2-3 years, however if he slows even a single step i think its the end of the road for him.

Overall both players equally matched.

You don't happen to be that Arabic commentator? How's Federarasism? Is it a good religion?
 
You don't happen to be that Arabic commentator? How's Federarasism? Is it a good religion?

That exquisite commentator should be in charge of every match. :)

I don't speak for him, of course, but I'd say Federarism is a fine religion. Unfortunately, my employer begs to differ. I requested the finals of the Australian Open, Wimbledon, U.S. Open and the WTFs off as paid holidays but received no response from HR. Religious discrimination, if you ask me — or perhaps a case of blatant Nadalism when they countered with an offer of every French Open final off.
 
Heres my expert opinion on the exhibition.
1. Soderling and Berdych are in same league. Both are ball bashers with huge serves. However they dont have that killer shot to beat Nadal.
Both are clearly a notch below Nadal and Fed.

2. Nadal and Fed. Both are equal in most aspects. Fed is definately better at volleys. His forehand is also the best. However Nadal has more consistent forehand.
Feds backhand today was ripping. His crosscourt backhand gave Nadal more trouble than any other shot.
Was surprised at low net clearance of both players. Nadal Definitely has flattened his shots.
Nadals serve has also improved , though on breakpoints he always predictably goes for the slice/spin serve.

Fed also trying different returns on serve. Sometimes rushing the second serve, sometimes standing beyond the baseline. Me thinks the latter worked.
As much as people emphasise Nadals spin generated, its on valid for his forehand and for shots he gets into good position. During rallies, fed's forehand, backhand ,volleys , obviosly had a lot more spin than Nadals. His forehand is remarkable for the spin, low clearance , depth and pace it generates.


Also Federer is more sublime, fluid and artistic. I can see hi playing into his forties.
Nadal is brute raw power and speed. He may be on top for next 2-3 years, however if he slows even a single step i think its the end of the road for him.

Overall both players equally matched.

Fed lost. Apparently Fed was not sublime enough.
 
Also Federer is more sublime, fluid and artistic. I can see hi playing into his forties.

I agree, it would be amazing for Rafa to have a 15 or 20 win lead in the head2head over the GOAT, I guess about 30-10 would be a reasonable head2head to expect if Federer plays until 40+, and they can meet a lot more when Federer slips from the number 2 mantle so they are in the same half of draws. That's why I think tennis is better off if Federer is number 3, because of the opportunity for Rafa vs Federer in semis, and they seem to make semis in almost every event, except for RG/Wimbledon. Certainly on hardcourts they will play a lot once Federer slips from the 2-spot.
 
Back
Top