Admit it

[The Big Foe fan]

None of the big3 are as good at pure tennis groundstrokes as agassi was.
They just happen to be having better athleticism than Andre.

 

[Deleted member 748597]

 

[The Big Foe fan]

Cute rabit

 

[President]

I think you could make a good argument that Federer and Nadal have better forehands than Agassi did. Novak is close on both wings. All 3 have much better athleticism as you said.

 

[The Big Foe fan]

I think you could make a good argument that Federer and Nadal have better forehands than Agassi did. Novak is close on both wings. All 3 have much better athleticism as you said.

Not as much power as agassi, not hitting on the rise.
For sure fedal have better forehands, but not from the pure tennis perspective, its because their athleticism is better they can hit better shot from difficult postions and turn defence into attack better than anyone.

 

[President]

Not as much power as agassi, not hitting on the rise.
For sure fedal have better forehands, but not from the pure tennis perspective, its because their athleticism is better they can hit better shot from difficult postions and turn defence into attack better than anyone.

That's a fair take. Agassi's groundstrokes were ridiculous and I would love to see what he could do in this era if he was focused and dedicated.

 

[RF-18]

no

 

[The Big Foe fan]

That's a fair take. Agassi's groundstrokes were ridiculous and I would love to see what he could do in this era if he was focused and dedicated.

He'd basically smoke the nextgen on any surface.

 

[The Big Foe fan]

overrated

Bruh wot

 

[President]

no

Care to elaborate?

 

[Daniel Andrade]

wth is a pure groundstroke

 

[MichaelNadal]

wth is a pure groundstroke

the crispiest

 

[Kralingen]

I heard a take from a while back saying that Agassi’s pure ball striking would be a little less of an outlier in the slower court and poly era.

Not that he wouldn’t still be an ATG player, but that he was such a unique ball striker on fast courts bc no one could take the ball earlier than him, and it was comparatively a lot more difficult to play baseline effectively in that era.

I always thought Agassi would be 100% better in this era, and he likely would, but his key advantages over the field might not be as pronounced. Then again, not having to play PETE is probably the biggest advantage of playing in the modern era.

 

[Andy Murray Is Goat]

wth is a pure groundstroke

Yeah I would like to know the definition lool

 

[King No1e]

I'd give Djokovic equal or better standing in this department.

 

[The Big Foe fan]

I'd give Djokovic equal or better standing in this department.

No bruh.
He's definitely less powerful and does not take it as early as Andre did.

 

[MichaelNadal]

I admit that this jacket Michael only wore once, for the Thriller rehearsals, is badass af I would rock that thing today

 

[King No1e]

I admit that this jacket Michael only wore once, for the Thriller rehearsals, is badass af I would rock that thing today

Underrated

 

[MichaelNadal]

Underrated

Even better than Djokovic 2010 kits?

 

[King No1e]

Even better than Djokovic 2010 kits?

Now now, let's not get carried away

 

[junior74]

the crispiest

 

[MichaelNadal]

Underrated

This is epic af

 

[Cashman]

I omit everything