Aerogel 200 vs. K-Factor 95 16x18?

[topspin_17]

Has anyone been able to try both of these sticks and compare? I was looking at the specs of the Aerogel, and thought that I would like it, but I can get the K95 for a really cheap price. Please post comments if you have tried both sticks. Are both sticks stable? Because I like 'solid' feeling rackets, which don't swing super light, but are still easy on the arm, and yet not a burden to heave.

 

[knasty131]

first thought for me would be spin potential...the wilson would more than likely give you more

 

[White_Rice]

Anyone know why there isn't a 16x19 version of the 200?

 

[snoflewis]

Anyone know why there isn't a 16x19 version of the 200?

dunno about the older rackets, but the 200 series from the HM to mfil from dunlop were 18x20. there are the plus models that were 16x19, but the main flagship player's rackets were 18x20. just like the prestiges

 

[WhiteSox05CA]

Anyone know why there isn't a 16x19 version of the 200?

The 16x19 version of the Aerogel is comin' out in September. It's slightly lighter than the current AG 200. I think it's about 11.6 oz. or somewhere around there. I suppose it will be similar to the M-Fil 200 2006.

 

[White_Rice]

The 16x19 version of the Aerogel is comin' out in September. It's slightly lighter than the current AG 200. I think it's about 11.6 oz. or somewhere around there. I suppose it will be similar to the M-Fil 200 2006.

Thanks. I don't really like tight string patterns. The Aerogel 300 is too light for me and the specs on the 200 are what I find ideal except for the string pattern.

 

[smittysan89]

I tried the K95 and it felt even stiffer than the n6.1 95. Felt like an absolute rock. Ok for serve and volley, but I didnt really like it at all for groundies...