Agressive baseliner recommendations, please!

Underdog

Professional
Hello, guys!
I’ve posted before asking for guidance on all-court frames. Since then, I think I’ve gravitated toward a more conservative (?) approach and I believe right now I’m more of an agressive baseliner. Somewhat around Alcaraz, Nadal style. Very physical, a lot of running, power and spin and I still close out at the net when I’m able.
Currently playing with a VCP 21 97 310, considering adding weight at 10-2, full bed poly, no dampener, overgrip. Intermediate-advanced level.
I like my racquet, specially the maneuverability, control and comfort, but maybe there’s better options out there for me.
Thanks in advance. :)
 
Last edited:
I think your play style doesn’t scream aggressive baseliner to me

I think of Rublev, Sinner, Wawrinka etc as aggressive baseliners. Your racket is ideal for this style of play.

But if you’re running around a lot and being all court a racket with a little more juice for those on the run shots or when you’re out of position maybe a Vcore 98 or if you want to cut the difference between VCP and Vcore, Vcore 95
 
I would not say that Alcaraz and Nadal have similar styles of shot selection or point construction. To me, Alcaraz constructs points more similarly to Federer (I have heard Alcaraz make this comparison himself). I hope this does not count as self-promotion, since my video was already shared, but I do have dedicated videos on buying racquets based on 3 different styles (Aggro B-Liner, All-Court, and most recently, counter puncher) and they might help you identify your play style a bit more. I also don't think you need to overthink it. I personally, am a counter puncher, more of a Nadal style, but I don't use a racquet (18x20 Whiteout) that I think is particularly good for that style of play. I use it because I personally find that it works better for my tennis than the racquets that I usually think of as "counter punching" racquets.
 
I would not say that Alcaraz and Nadal have similar styles of shot selection or point construction. To me, Alcaraz constructs points more similarly to Federer (I have heard Alcaraz make this comparison himself). I hope this does not count as self-promotion, since my video was already shared, but I do have dedicated videos on buying racquets based on 3 different styles (Aggro B-Liner, All-Court, and most recently, counter puncher) and they might help you identify your play style a bit more. I also don't think you need to overthink it. I personally, am a counter puncher, more of a Nadal style, but I don't use a racquet (18x20 Whiteout) that I think is particularly good for that style of play. I use it because I personally find that it works better for my tennis than the racquets that I usually think of as "counter punching" racquets.
Wow. I didn’t know you were the dude from TennCom. Beckett, I believe? I watch many of your videos. I did catch up the 98s tier lost, aggro bliner and all court indications, as well as other stuff. I was hoping to find some further opinions around here as well. When I said around Nadal and Alcaraz I actually meant somewhat in between them, playstyle wise.
 
How do you guys feel about PA98, Ezone 98 and T-Fight ISO 305? Considering that I have sort of a all-court approach to agressive baselining o_O
Also, how do you think they compare to what I currently use?
 
How do you guys feel about PA98, Ezone 98 and T-Fight ISO 305? Considering that I have sort of a all-court approach to agressive baselining o_O
Also, how do you think they compare to what I currently use?
- PA98 stiffer / crisper than the 2 others, a bit whippier and more powerful than EZ98
- EZ98 softer feel than PA98, quite comfortable, well balanced in terms of power and control
Both EZ98 and PA98 are spinny and well balanced. Both are great options and may suit a lot intermediates and advanced players in the market for a modern « all around racquet ».The most important difference between the 2 is the feel IMO.
- ISO305: I have just tried the previous version of the TF305 (305RS), but I can tell you that it is quite different from the PA98 and EZ98. Feels like a hammer, quite head heavy, great feel, low launch angle, not as spinny as the aforementioned frames, very powerful. Hits like a truck, which can be extremely addictive and pleasant. However it is a pretty demanding racquet with a very high SW, more suited to advanced players. I would not recommend to switch to the TF305 without a long, careful and honest demo period.
Btw I demoed all these racquets and ended up with a Prince Tour 100p.
Hope that it will help ;)
 
Last edited:
- PA98 stiffer / crisper than the 2 others, a bit whippier and more powerful than EZ98
- EZ98 softer feel than PA98, quite comfortable, well balanced in terms of power and control
Both EZ98 and PA98 are spinny and well balanced. Both are great options and may suit a lot intermediates and advanced players in the market for a modern « all around racquet ».The most important difference between the 2 is the feel IMO.
- ISO305: I have just tried the previous version of the TF305 (305RS), but I can tell you that it is quite different from the PA98 and EZ98. Feels like a hammer, quite head heavy, great feel, low launch angle, not as spinny as the aforementioned frames, very powerful. Hits like a truck, which can be extremely addictive and pleasant. However it is a pretty demanding racquet with a very high SW, more suited to advanced players. I would not recommend to switch to the TF305 without a long, careful and honest demo period.
Btw I demoed all these racquets and ended up with a Prince Tour 100p.
Hope that it will help ;)
Thanks for sharing!
 
Wow. I didn’t know you were the dude from TennCom. Beckett, I believe? I watch many of your videos. I did catch up the 98s tier lost, aggro bliner and all court indications, as well as other stuff. I was hoping to find some further opinions around here as well. When I said around Nadal and Alcaraz I actually meant somewhat in between them, playstyle wise.
Thanks! Yeah that’s me.

I think you should investigate a modified VC98.
 
@Underdog - Short of seeing a video of you playing, from your descriptions alone -- a baseline-centric all-courter with a 4.0-ish skill level and high-ish physicality -- I think something with a bit more inherent free power and counterpunching stability would be a good idea, and I would say you're on the right track with the few models you've mentioned. In particular, I would focus on frame with the following characteristics:

- Head Size: 97-99", select 100's
- Weight: 305-315g unstrung, or 270-300g for a platform stick if you've got the customization skills
- Swing Weight: >= 315 so you don't have to add too much lead to make it playable, <=330-ish so it's not too sluggish with no recourse
- Pattern: semi-open 16-mains or open 18-mains, for best mix of control/spin/power
- Beam: >=21.5mm, <=24mm for enough free power and torsional stability, yet not too clunky
- Flex: >=62, <=66/67, for enough bludgeoning force and counterpunching thuddy-ness, without feeling like an arm-breaker

All of that considered, here's my shortlist (alphabetical by brand/model):
- Babolat Pure Aero 98
- Babolat Pure Strike 98 16x19, maybe 18x20 - maybe too muted or flat-hitter biased, but threw it in anyways
- Head Radical MP
- Head Speed MP, lightly customized, possibly the Pro
- Solinco WhiteOut 18x20 - not sure if you have access
- Tecnifibre TFight 300, customized up
- Tecnifibre TFight ISO 315
- Wilson Blade 100 v8
- Wilson Pro Staff 97 v14
- Wilson Pro Staff 97L or 97UL v14, customized up (for better power-to-weight ratio than the regular PS97 v14)
- Wilson Pro Staff X
- Wilson Pro Staff Six One 100 v14
- Wilson Shift 300, maybe 315
- Yonex EZone 98
- (upcoming) Yonex Percept 100D

Racquets I've left out, and why:
- Dunlop FX 500 Tour - probably a bit too muted and the upper string bed is too open/uncontrollable for flatter/rushed contact, unless you've got that Pure Drive type "swat" or "slap" to your swing
- Head Boom Pro - too muted, and too much of an uncontrollable hot spot in the upper half of the hoop
- Head Extreme Tour - a bit of a customization bear and very string sensitive as a result, plus the string bed is ultimately too lively or "hot" for most all-courters, versus the Radical which much more consistent/composed
- Head Radical Pro - this is probably the most contentious exclusion, but at equal strung spec to the MP, noticeably lower power-to-weight ratio and less free counterpunch from the narrower beam
- Tecnifibre TFight ISO 305 - while it has unrivaled "honeymoon potential", it's ultimately too much of a "hammer" to be long-term usable for most 4.0's, let alone 5.0's

With little to no demo ability, if you had to buy something site-unseen, I'd probably go EZone 98 or Pro Staff v14 Six One 100 or X, maybe a Blade 100 v8 -- any of those spec'd up to 330+ static, 320+ swing weight, with a balance that's a fit for your mechanics and a recoil weight that's appropriate for your height and reach. If you have supreme customization ability (like, you own a Briffidi SW1, etc) and you want for more precision, do a Pro Staff v14 97L or 97UL, with that nice extra-stable/powerful 23+mm beam, spec'd up to whatever static/balance/swing-weight is perfect for you. The Pure Aero 98 might stand a chance, but it may just be a bit too demanding and/or open of a string pattern if you don't have swipey-enough strokes.

I know that was a metric ton of info and geeking out. I hope some of it helps!
 
Last edited:
@Underdog - Short of seeing a video of you playing, from your descriptions alone -- a baseline-centric all-courter with a 4.0-ish skill level and high-ish physicality -- I think something with a bit more inherent free power and counterpunching stability would be a good idea, and I would say you're on the right track with the few models you've mentioned. In particular, I would focus on frame with the following characteristics:

- Head Size: 97-99", select 100's
- Weight: 305-315g unstrung, or 270-300g for a platform stick if you've got the customization skills
- Swing Weight: >= 315 so you don't have to add too much lead to make it playable, <=330-ish so it's not too sluggish with no recourse
- Pattern: semi-open 16-mains or open 18-mains, for best mix of control/spin/power
- Beam: >=21.5mm, <=24mm for enough free power and torsional stability, yet not too clunky
- Flex: >=62, <=66/67, for enough bludgeoning force and counterpunching thuddy-ness, without feeling like an arm-breaker

All of that considered, here's my shortlist (alphabetical by brand/model):
- Babolat Pure Aero 98
- Babolat Pure Strike 98 16x19, maybe 18x20 - maybe too muted or flat-hitter biased, but threw it in anyways
- Head Radical MP
- Head Speed MP, lightly customized, possibly the Pro
- Solinco WhiteOut 18x20 - not sure if you have access
- Tecnifibre TFight 300, customized up
- Tecnifibre TFight ISO 315
- Wilson Blade 100 v8
- Wilson Pro Staff 97 v14
- Wilson Pro Staff 97L or 97UL v14, customized up (for better power-to-weight ratio than the regular PS97 v14)
- Wilson Pro Staff X
- Wilson Pro Staff Six One 100 v14
- Wilson Shift 300, maybe 315
- Yonex EZone 98
- (upcoming) Yonex Percept 100D

Racquets I've left out, and why:
- Dunlop FX 500 Tour - probably a bit too muted and the upper string bed is too open/uncontrollable for flatter/rushed contact, unless you've got that Pure Drive type "swat" or "slap" to your swing
- Head Boom Pro - too muted, and too much of an uncontrollable hot spot in the upper half of the hoop
- Head Extreme Tour - a bit of a customization bear and very string sensitive as a result, plus the string bed is ultimately too lively or "hot" for most all-courters, versus the Radical which much more consistent/composed
- Head Radical Pro - this is probably the most contentious exclusion, but at equal strung spec to the MP, noticeably lower power-to-weight ratio and less counterpunch cradling from the narrower beam
- Tecnifibre TFight ISO 305 - while it has unrivaled "honeymoon potential", it's ultimately too much of a "hammer" to be of long-term usable for most 4.0's, let alone 5.0's

With little to know demo ability, if you had to buy something site-unseen, I'd probably go EZone 98 or Pro Staff Six One 100 v14 or X, maybe a Blade 100, -- any of those spec'd up to 330+ static, with a balance that's a fit for your mechanics and a recoil weight that's appropriate for your height and reach. If you have supreme customization capability (like, you own a Briffidi SW1, etc) then for more precision, a Pro Staff v14 97L or 97UL, with that nice extra-stable/powerful 23+mm beam, spec'd up to whatever static/balance/swing-weight is perfect for you. The Pure Aero 98 might standard a chance, but it may just be a bit too demanding and/or open of a string pattern if you don't have swipey-enough strokes.

I know that was a metric ton of info and geeking out. I hope some of it helps!
That was awesome, Trip. Really appreciated. Thanks for spending your time and sharing your thoughts. Admire you a lot, honestly.
 
@Underdog - Short of seeing a video of you playing, from your descriptions alone -- a baseline-centric all-courter with a 4.0-ish skill level and high-ish physicality -- I think something with a bit more inherent free power and counterpunching stability would be a good idea, and I would say you're on the right track with the few models you've mentioned. In particular, I would focus on frame with the following characteristics:

- Head Size: 97-99", select 100's
- Weight: 305-315g unstrung, or 270-300g for a platform stick if you've got the customization skills
- Swing Weight: >= 315 so you don't have to add too much lead to make it playable, <=330-ish so it's not too sluggish with no recourse
- Pattern: semi-open 16-mains or open 18-mains, for best mix of control/spin/power
- Beam: >=21.5mm, <=24mm for enough free power and torsional stability, yet not too clunky
- Flex: >=62, <=66/67, for enough bludgeoning force and counterpunching thuddy-ness, without feeling like an arm-breaker

All of that considered, here's my shortlist (alphabetical by brand/model):
- Babolat Pure Aero 98
- Babolat Pure Strike 98 16x19, maybe 18x20 - maybe too muted or flat-hitter biased, but threw it in anyways
- Head Radical MP
- Head Speed MP, lightly customized, possibly the Pro
- Solinco WhiteOut 18x20 - not sure if you have access
- Tecnifibre TFight 300, customized up
- Tecnifibre TFight ISO 315
- Wilson Blade 100 v8
- Wilson Pro Staff 97 v14
- Wilson Pro Staff 97L or 97UL v14, customized up (for better power-to-weight ratio than the regular PS97 v14)
- Wilson Pro Staff X
- Wilson Pro Staff Six One 100 v14
- Wilson Shift 300, maybe 315
- Yonex EZone 98
- (upcoming) Yonex Percept 100D

Racquets I've left out, and why:
- Dunlop FX 500 Tour - probably a bit too muted and the upper string bed is too open/uncontrollable for flatter/rushed contact, unless you've got that Pure Drive type "swat" or "slap" to your swing
- Head Boom Pro - too muted, and too much of an uncontrollable hot spot in the upper half of the hoop
- Head Extreme Tour - a bit of a customization bear and very string sensitive as a result, plus the string bed is ultimately too lively or "hot" for most all-courters, versus the Radical which much more consistent/composed
- Head Radical Pro - this is probably the most contentious exclusion, but at equal strung spec to the MP, noticeably lower power-to-weight ratio and less free counterpunch from the narrower beam
- Tecnifibre TFight ISO 305 - while it has unrivaled "honeymoon potential", it's ultimately too much of a "hammer" to be long-term usable for most 4.0's, let alone 5.0's

With little to no demo ability, if you had to buy something site-unseen, I'd probably go EZone 98 or Pro Staff v14 Six One 100 or X, maybe a Blade 100 v8 -- any of those spec'd up to 330+ static, 320+ swing weight, with a balance that's a fit for your mechanics and a recoil weight that's appropriate for your height and reach. If you have supreme customization ability (like, you own a Briffidi SW1, etc) and you want for more precision, do a Pro Staff v14 97L or 97UL, with that nice extra-stable/powerful 23+mm beam, spec'd up to whatever static/balance/swing-weight is perfect for you. The Pure Aero 98 might stand a chance, but it may just be a bit too demanding and/or open of a string pattern if you don't have swipey-enough strokes.

I know that was a metric ton of info and geeking out. I hope some of it helps!
How do you feel about the TF40 305 16x19, considering the profile and in comparison to the shorlist? :)
 
Re- the TF40, I'd be concerned about lack of power in the frame/string-bed. There's a good chance you'd have to add potentially more swing weight and/or a bouncier/higher-power string setup than you'd otherwise ideally prefer. But if curiosity is still killing the cat, perhaps give it a demo and see!
 
@Underdog - Short of seeing a video of you playing, from your descriptions alone -- a baseline-centric all-courter with a 4.0-ish skill level and high-ish physicality -- I think something with a bit more inherent free power and counterpunching stability would be a good idea, and I would say you're on the right track with the few models you've mentioned. In particular, I would focus on frame with the following characteristics:

- Head Size: 97-99", select 100's
- Weight: 305-315g unstrung, or 270-300g for a platform stick if you've got the customization skills
- Swing Weight: >= 315 so you don't have to add too much lead to make it playable, <=330-ish so it's not too sluggish with no recourse
- Pattern: semi-open 16-mains or open 18-mains, for best mix of control/spin/power
- Beam: >=21.5mm, <=24mm for enough free power and torsional stability, yet not too clunky
- Flex: >=62, <=66/67, for enough bludgeoning force and counterpunching thuddy-ness, without feeling like an arm-breaker

All of that considered, here's my shortlist (alphabetical by brand/model):
- Babolat Pure Aero 98
- Babolat Pure Strike 98 16x19, maybe 18x20 - maybe too muted or flat-hitter biased, but threw it in anyways
- Head Radical MP
- Head Speed MP, lightly customized, possibly the Pro
- Solinco WhiteOut 18x20 - not sure if you have access
- Tecnifibre TFight 300, customized up
- Tecnifibre TFight ISO 315
- Wilson Blade 100 v8
- Wilson Pro Staff 97 v14
- Wilson Pro Staff 97L or 97UL v14, customized up (for better power-to-weight ratio than the regular PS97 v14)
- Wilson Pro Staff X
- Wilson Pro Staff Six One 100 v14
- Wilson Shift 300, maybe 315
- Yonex EZone 98
- (upcoming) Yonex Percept 100D

Racquets I've left out, and why:
- Dunlop FX 500 Tour - probably a bit too muted and the upper string bed is too open/uncontrollable for flatter/rushed contact, unless you've got that Pure Drive type "swat" or "slap" to your swing
- Head Boom Pro - too muted, and too much of an uncontrollable hot spot in the upper half of the hoop
- Head Extreme Tour - a bit of a customization bear and very string sensitive as a result, plus the string bed is ultimately too lively or "hot" for most all-courters, versus the Radical which much more consistent/composed
- Head Radical Pro - this is probably the most contentious exclusion, but at equal strung spec to the MP, noticeably lower power-to-weight ratio and less free counterpunch from the narrower beam
- Tecnifibre TFight ISO 305 - while it has unrivaled "honeymoon potential", it's ultimately too much of a "hammer" to be long-term usable for most 4.0's, let alone 5.0's

With little to no demo ability, if you had to buy something site-unseen, I'd probably go EZone 98 or Pro Staff v14 Six One 100 or X, maybe a Blade 100 v8 -- any of those spec'd up to 330+ static, 320+ swing weight, with a balance that's a fit for your mechanics and a recoil weight that's appropriate for your height and reach. If you have supreme customization ability (like, you own a Briffidi SW1, etc) and you want for more precision, do a Pro Staff v14 97L or 97UL, with that nice extra-stable/powerful 23+mm beam, spec'd up to whatever static/balance/swing-weight is perfect for you. The Pure Aero 98 might stand a chance, but it may just be a bit too demanding and/or open of a string pattern if you don't have swipey-enough strokes.

I know that was a metric ton of info and geeking out. I hope some of it helps!
Hi, it’s me again 8-B. I got reluctant over switching racquets, but now I’m very invested in going for a PA98. Do you have any recommendations customization-wise? What string pattern (thin round, thick shaped…) do you suggest to keep the best spin possible whilst keeping power and launch angle tamed, good control and predictability?
For increased info, I’m around 5’9 height.
 
Back
Top