I do. For anyone who can't, Team clocks at 281 lbs/in which is quite crazy high. Blast "only" 233. That's for 16 gauge, 17 gauge still higher but not that big a difference (245 vs 234).
As always with strings, tension is important. Thinner gauges will generally be flexier/softer than thicker ones, but at certain tensions (generally high) thin strings will be more strained (tension/section area) than thicker ones, and above a certain tension, polys will become much stiffer, so it could theoretically happen that some string at say 55 lbs will gain enough stiffness to overcome the difference in thickness, and behave stiffer overall than the same string at the same tension but thicker gauge (in other words, flex less on impact with the ball).
And this can actually be seen in the TWU string database. Most strings record lower stiffness when going up in gauge (thinner), but sometimes thinner gauges will show higher stiffness values since they are measured at 51 lbs. I haven't dived enough into the Racketpedia database but it seems to me that they measure the stiffness from rest, as their data is generally 3x or 4x times lower than TWU's (if you convert units), and it sometimes happen one string is stiffer in one database and softer in the other.
So, back to RPM Team. It's supposed to be the SAME String, material and shape wise, only pre-stretched and infused with micro bubbles.
So, it's supposed to play softer because the bubbles will make the string to be effectively "thinner" (less material, more stretch), but if you string both at the same tension, Team will probably lose less tension with time and use (due to pre-stretch), and be stiffer (or as if it was strung tighter). But if you pre-stretch Blast, then Team should be softer. UNLESS you string both at a very high tension, then Team may become stiffer again because it enters "earlier" in the steeper area of the tension/elongation profile.
The difference in the stiffness shown in TWU is probably mostly due to tension loss being higher in Blast though.
