He should be winning M1000 tournamemts left and right and he isnt
Lets also remember he has 4 slams and how many masters? How many weeks at number one?
Let us at least respect the game and the past greats and curb this sensational godlike nonsense until he reaches double digit slams.
Not him. He should aim high and nothing wrong with anything he said. But for us to assume (and yes that is exactly what people here are saying) and for people to say he ALREADY is the best level of all time is absurd.Some foolishness, this.
The kid said at the end of career he'd like to sit ".....at the same table...". Not at the head of it. He'd like to, not he will. He is aiming high, not proclaiming that he will get there. What should he do but aim high? I like his goals.
I get your frustration. But aiming high is not disrespecting the greats / their achievements. Novak compared Carlitos to Roger / Rafa / himself last year and said he could win many more majors. Pundits say it too, subject to health / fitness. It is obviously his potential that is being referred to, nothing else. Potential is spoken of before it happens, not when it has been achieved, so I disagree. Carlitos does not have to reach double digits before his current achievements can be celebrated and his potential discussed.
"4 a year for the next 5 or 6 years"It is hard for me to look at Sinner and think he has the physicality for a long career. He seems reasonably tough, but the stress on those long levers....
Let's see, 4 a year from here on out for a mere 5 or 6 years, well someone else needs to do the math
He needs 25 to be a farm animal. 20 to be in the Convo.1. He does not have to win 25 majors to be part of the same level as the big 3.
2. His chances are much more than 1% to get there.
3. I see him average 2 majors / year.
He needs 25 to be a farm animal. 20 to be in the Convo.
His chances statistically are less than 1% as only 3 people ever have won 20 slams.
2 majors a year means he never gets a major injury (unlikely considering his play style).
His era has not even really started. His wins were against old Rafa and Djoker. Winning the CYGS would be huge but is still just 4 slams and means he would need to be in the 15+.There is no GOAT. He will be the best of his era. Couple that with his wins over Djokodal.
If he wins CYGS, then that alone is enough to place him as same level as big 3.
His era has not even really started. His wins were against old Rafa and Djoker. Winning the CYGS would be huge but is still just 4 slams and means he would need to be in the 15+.
All good points. However, I would not assume he is going to be winning a bunch of slams after 30.He has won 4 of the last 8 majors . He was injured for one and cramped a second and knows exactly what he did wrong in the 3rd. His coach was not there in the 4th.
We are going to see him get some big numbers by the time he is 26-28.
If he gets CYGS, getting to around 15 is very much in the ball park .
He is good on all surfaces and competition is weak outside of Sinner, Zed and Med.
All good points. However, I would not assume he is going to be winning a bunch of slams after 30.
Yet to be seen. USO will be a big start.He may not have to win much after 30.
This is 4 slams in 14 total appearances at the slam level.He is starting win big tournaments at a very fast pace.
Alcaraz is impressive for sure but he is nowhere near peak Federer.Hes already shown the best peak of tennis i have ever seen along with federer, and in sure its not his total peak yet
To me, in peak, he can be in the conversation, peak Federer just did It more consistently, i did watch peak Federer live and despite the recency bias, i feel something very similar watching both play, lets see when he improves consistency if you change your mind, i have seen a lot of matches from Alcaraz though, so i know what hes capable ofAlcaraz is impressive for sure but he is nowhere near peak Federer.
Right on! Let's just hope the kid doesn't end up as Bjorn Borg retiring too early for his personal reasons.Alcaraz has stated he wants to sit at the table of the big 3 and ultimately surpass them with the career trajectory he is on.
Yet to be seen. USO will be a big start.
Maybe that is cause he has like a billion next's if he wants to join big3.This is what folks are going to keep saying. Let him get the next , let him get the next ..
Maybe that is cause he has like a billion next's if he wants to join big3.
Yes he is. Now do it for another decade.He is better than the big 3 at this age.
Hes already shown the best peak of tennis i have ever seen along with federer, and im sure its not his total peak yet
Yes he is. Now do it for another decade.
Excited and enjoy it yes.At the rate he is going , he may not have to go for a decade. I want to enjoy the ride right from the start and he has excited me . I understand some who are so passionate and nostalgic about big 3. To me it is no disrespect and we don’t need to wait any longer to be excited about Alcaraz
Excited and enjoy it yes.
Predict and say he is going to surpass them is crazy talk and really unfair to talk about until he is at least half way there. But to each their own. I do hope he does all the things you guys say.
Alcaraz has yet to reach his peak.Alcaraz is impressive for sure but he is nowhere near peak Federer.
We shall see. I have no problem being proved wrong.I am saying that he has a great chance to be spoken in the same breadth as big 3. For you the metrics to be allowed for comparison are different. I think Alcaraz is going to achieve the half way mark in no time . So our disagreement will not last long
Highest peak Doesnt have to last the whole tournament, a peak is a peak, im talking how high that peak got, sinner didnt reach that peak the whole tournament, he just was steady, which wasnt enough once he got a decent oponentCalm down kid don't get excited. Highest ever peak where? Needed 5 sets to beat Tiafoe is highest peak?
No reason why he can’t to be fairYes he is. Now do it for another decade.
No reason why he can’t to be fair
Highest peak Doesnt have to last the whole tournament, a peak is a peak, im talking how high that peak got, sinner didnt reach that peak the whole tournament, he just was steady, which wasnt enough once he got a decent oponent
Nothing can stop us. Carlos tends his sheep while the farm animals run the showBig 3 forever. @Lleytonstation
This is what I posted in 2022. He is living up to his talent level.Alcaraz made me a fan in an hour with the way he took apart RBA at Indian Wells this year when I watched him courtside for the first time. Most talent I have seen in a player since young Djokovic and the first one to really get me excited since the Big 3 blossomed.
You keep mentioning the Tiafoe match but It was a tricky indoors match and he won 6-2 in the 5th lolYou mean peak for a game?lol
Like the greats haven't had to survive upsets LOL.You keep mentioning the Tiafoe match but It was a tricky indoors match and he won 6-2 in the 5th lol
Yah Man. Check out this piece, with the facts of his achievements to date. We're jamming.At the rate he is going , he may not have to go for a decade. I want to enjoy the ride right from the start and he has excited me . I understand some who are so passionate and nostalgic about big 3. To me it is no disrespect and we don’t need to wait any longer to be excited about Alcaraz
Player | 4th Major Title | Age | Record In Major Finals |
Roger Federer | 2004 US Open | 23 | 4-0 |
Rafael Nadal | 2008 Roland Garros | 22 | 4-2 |
Novak Djokovic | 2011 US Open | 24 | 4-2 |
Carlos Alcaraz | 2024 Wimbledon | 21 | 4-0 |
Player | Slam Matches At 4th Major | Grand Slam Winning % |
Roger Federer | 79 | 77.2% (61-18) |
Rafael Nadal | 81 | 84% (68-13) |
Novak Djokovic | 134 | 82.1% (110-24) |
Carlos Alcaraz | 69 | 85.5% (59-10) |