Mark-Touch
G.O.A.T.
Well duh!He will constantly come up short.
You expect him to grow a few more inches at his age?
Well duh!He will constantly come up short.
Your response is a complete false analogy because the age difference between Novak Djokovic the GOAT and roger federer is a LOT SMALLER than the age difference between novak djokovic and carlos alcaraz and the age difference between novak djokovic and jannik sinner and thus, it is more expected that novak djokovic would not come right out of the gates initially with complete domination over roger federer whereas both carlos alcaraz and jannik sinner simply do not have this leniency at all.How did Djokovic do in his first 5-10 matches with Federer?
Once again, your response is a complete false analogy because the age difference between Novak Djokovic the GOAT and roger federer is a LOT SMALLER than the age difference between novak djokovic and carlos alcaraz and the age difference between novak djokovic and jannik sinner and thus, it is more expected that novak djokovic would not come right out of the gates initially with complete domination over roger federer whereas both carlos alcaraz and jannik sinner simply do not have this leniency at all.
It’s not about being politically correct. For example, he wouldn’t react to the crowd for good or bad so much if he didn’t care what people think. It definitely bothers the guy that he wasn’t liked in the same way Fedal are/were.Nah, Novak Djokovic the GOAT is more politically incorrect than either rafael nadal or roger federer so novak djokovic cares the LEAST about what people think out of the big 3.
Nah, Novak Djokovic the GOAT reacts to the crowd not because he "cares" about what they think, but because novak djokovic is not afraid to put people in their place. Novak djokovic does not care about whether people like him or not which is why novak djokovic is not afraid to put people in their place.It’s not about being politically correct. For example, he wouldn’t react to the crowd for good or bad so much if he didn’t care what people think. It definitely bothers the guy that he wasn’t liked in the same way Fedal are/were.
Yeah, hold Sinner up as the example. Garbage
Carlos lost one match to Djoko on clay and you phrase it like it's a regular thing. And your exalted Ubermensch went 0-3 vs Alcaraz this year. Try to make better arguments
Nadal's first meeting with Fedole at a hard court slam: 2009 (22)True but Fedovic had the misfortune of having the Nadal as the obstacle at the FO.
Granted Fed blew that 2004 opportunity (IIRC he was the bookies favourite for the FO that year) and well Novak lost to Stanimal in 2015.
Borg-Laver in their first 7 matches was 4-3carlos alcaraz still has a LOSING head-to-head against novak djokovic which is a HUGE PROBLEM since TRUE all-time greats have always DOMINATED their predecessors all throughout tennis history!
Umm. It was a pretty big match for the gold. And grandpa still playing on one surgical leg. Carlos essentially does nothing after Wimbledon. Again. Clearly his coach isn’t doing a good job because truthfully Carlos didn’t make any huge gains from last year to this year as a player. While sinner is improving much more
While Carlos squeaked some matches out against sinner. All 3 could have went either way and sinner almost got him on clay. So overconfident with an inflated ego is the last thing Carlos needs. As sinner will be Gunning for clay and grass even harder next year than he did hards this year
Plus you hardly ever see sinner go out early now. He beats the guys consistently that he is supposed to 95-99 percent of the time. Carlos isn’t doing that
Once again, your response is a complete false analogy because the age difference between Novak Djokovic the GOAT and roger federer is a LOT SMALLER than the age difference between novak djokovic and carlos alcaraz and the age difference between novak djokovic and jannik sinner and thus, it is more expected that novak djokovic would not come right out of the gates initially with complete domination over roger federer whereas both carlos alcaraz and jannik sinner simply do not have this leniency at all.
Right, which is why he totally doesn’t do the on court impersonations, dances, and numerous other gestures to try and get people on his side. If he truly didn’t care he wouldn’t react at all. Instead he hyper reactionary at times.Nah, Novak Djokovic the GOAT reacts to the crowd not because he "cares" about what they think, but because novak djokovic is not afraid to put people in their place. Novak djokovic does not care about whether people like him or not which is why novak djokovic is not afraid to put people in their place.
Well both borg and sampras were TRUE all-time greats who dominated their predecessors as mathematically demonstrated via head-to-head comparisons. Edberg is historically the weakest all-time great ever who won 6 slams or more and struggled with connors initially but eventually was able to level the head-to-head with connors eventually BUT connors was the only older all-time great who was an early problem for edberg which is completely unlike the situation of carlos alcaraz who only has LOSING head-to-heads with all of the older all-time greats who he has faced, namely BOTH Novak Djokovic and Rafael Nadal!Nadal's first meeting with Fedole at a hard court slam: 2009 (22)
Djokovic's first meeting with Fedal at Wimbly: 2007 (20, retired; next 2011)
Federer's first meeting with Rafole at RG: 2005 (23)
Borg-Laver in their first 7 matches was 4-3
Edberg-Connors in their first 7 matches was 2-5
Sampras-Lendl in their first 7 matches was 4-3
You won’t get any arguments from me about Carlitos. He is extraordinary. With that said, Sinner is now looking effortless in hardcourt majors to the extent that he can win them easily and effortlessly in a machine-like manner. It was scary watching him cruise to the US Open title completely untroubled, and up until the final at AO he barely broke a sweat. Scary how efficient he has become.Isn’t this a bit of hyperbole? He didn’t win any Slams before this year and Carlos won 2 out of the last 3 Slams in addition to having a 2-Slam lead over Sinner while being two years younger.
He might be able to surpass Schwartzman.Well duh!
You expect him to grow a few more inches at his age?
You won’t get any arguments from me about Carlitos. He is extraordinary. With that said, Sinner is now looking effortless in hardcourt majors to the extent that he can win them easily and effortlessly in a machine-like manner. It was scary watching him cruise to the US Open title completely untroubled, and up until the final at AO he barely broke a sweat. Scary how efficient he has become.
I don’t think you’re alone in questioning my statement on Sinner, though. There is definitely a lag in the average casual tennis fan’s recognition of Sinner. And I think Carlitos being such a young prodigy has contributed to that because he fares so well in a by-age comparison in majors with Sinner.
It sounds crazy now but there were some casual tennis fans who doubted whether Sinner was ready to take the next step at the start of the year. They doubted him at AO this year, and I think there is a lag in people coming to recognise just efficient and dominant he has become in hard court majors now.
Alcaraz has such an X Factor, though. We are waiting for that year where he breaks through the lifeless conditions at AO and figures out a way to make the full spectrum of his game shine in the very lifeless and dead, low bouncing Melbourne Park conditions.
Fair point. Drugs and particularly Sinner’s place in all that and the sanctions he may still be facing is the great unknowable at the moment. And the stakes are high.IMO the only logical take on Sinner is that he has the drive, the power, and the talent to be really special, but the question was always his stamina/strength...now he has added those, but then there is the doping test and any normal person is putting a bit of an asterisk on his huge leap and dominance on hard ct
I get what you're saying, he gets agitated with the crowd a lot etc. but I meant he doesn't care in the sense that he'll speak his mind and deal with the repercussions while Fedal had the more clean cut image of what tennis players "should be all about" traditionally by saying the more PC things.If any of the Big 3 care about what people think it’s Joker by a landslide.
Djokovic STILL is a heel (and I like heels). Much rather him trash-talk (whilst still being the respectful man he is) than feign humility.None of the Big 3 were humble but Federer and especially Nadal hid it better than Djokovic who just didn't give a ****, he said what he wanted and didn't care what people thought. It was one of the reasons why I really liked young Djokovic, he sort of rebelled against the "clean cut" establishment of Fedal and wasn't scared of them one bit while the rest of the tennis world was bowing down to them and kissing their boots or tennis sneakers so to speak.
Alcaraz isn't as brash and outspoken as Djokovic but he isn't scared of anybody and he has no problem saying how good he is and can be. Sinner is more of the "aw shucks" type which is fine but is kind of generic and boring IMO.
I think Carlitos is being very careful with his scheduling and basically phoning it in everywhere but the majors to try and help his career longevity.The challenge for Carlos is that he is designed like Michael Chang and Boris Becker, in that he ages 1.25x the rate of a normal human.
Given that math, he is already approaching the twilight of his career and must act now before the window closes.
100%, couldn't agree more. Nobody represented "Feign Humility" more than Federer which is why I always endeared more to Djokovic than Federer or Nadal, he was the crasher of the Fedal "Glamour Party" and A LOT of people didn't like it but I loved it.Djokovic STILL is a heel (and I like heels). Much rather him trash-talk (whilst still being the respectful man he is) than feign humility.
Well if Novak Djokovic the GOAT was a 40+ grand slam winner, then novak djokovic would have completely dominated both roger federer and rafael nadal from the very beginning. The big 3 are all close in ability so novak djokovic's head-to-heads with both roger federer and rafael nadal make sense. Either way, there is ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSE for carlos alcaraz having LOSING head-to-heads with BOTH Novak Djokovic AND Rafael Nadal who are both WAY OLDER than carlos alcaraz since every TRUE all-time great who has won six slams or more has DOMINATED in the head-to-head all preceding all-time greats who are ten years or more older and who have won six slams or more.But Djokovic is better. So yeah he should have done better. Right?
Tonne of bs.Well if Novak Djokovic the GOAT was a 40+ grand slam winner, then novak djokovic would have completely dominated both roger federer and rafael nadal from the very beginning. The big 3 are all close in ability so novak djokovic's head-to-heads with both roger federer and rafael nadal make sense. Either way, there is ABSOLUTELY NO EXCUSE for carlos alcaraz having LOSING head-to-heads with BOTH Novak Djokovic AND Rafael Nadal who are both WAY OLDER than carlos alcaraz since every TRUE all-time great who has won six slams or more has DOMINATED in the head-to-head all preceding all-time greats who are ten years or more older and who have won six slams or more.
Novak Djokovic the GOAT does not do "impersonations, dances, and gestures" to get people "on his side" because novak djokovic does all these things to just entertain and if some people do not like it, novak djokovic will still do whatever he wants. Novak djokovic putting people in there place does not mean that novak djokovic is "hyper-reactionary" and does not mean that novak djokovic personally "cares about what people think" instead it simply means that novak djokovic does not want people to think that they can get away with doing BS nonsense.Right, which is why he totally doesn’t do the on court impersonations, dances, and numerous other gestures to try and get people on his side. If he truly didn’t care he wouldn’t react at all. Instead he hyper reactionary at times.
What I have said is completely factual and not "bs".Tonne of bs.
Novak Djokovic the GOAT does not do "impersonations, dances, and gestures" to get people "on his side" because novak djokovic does all these things to just entertain and if some people do not like it, novak djokovic will still do whatever he wants. Novak djokovic putting people in there place does not mean that novak djokovic is "hyper-reactionary" and does not mean that novak djokovic personally "cares about what people think" instead it simply means that novak djokovic does not want people to think that they can get away with doing BS nonsense.
LOL as always expected, you completely delusional irrational argumentless fedal fanatics cannot ever handle the TRUTH!
LOL as always expected, you completely delusional irrational argumentless fedal fanatics cannot ever handle the TRUTH!
He has wins over an older. closer-to-retitrement-than-not Djokovic. That's the point that needs to sink in. There's no glory or proof of ability defeating someone in the twilight of their career.Alcaraz has more Wimbledon Final wins over Djoko than Federer and Nadal combined....let that sink in
That is exactly what I have been trying to tell everyone. The fact that carlos alcaraz has a LOSING head-to-head with a geriatric disabled Novak Djokovic is NOT GOOD AT ALL!He has wins over an older. closer-to-retitrement-than-not Djokovic. That's the point that needs to sink in. There's no glory or proof of ability defeating someone in the twilight of their career.
Nah, the guy is still posting as of now.Was Djokovic the conqueror banned or something?
Didn't Fed say that in various ways and many folk just snorted and called him arrogant and full of hubris?100%, couldn't agree more. Nobody represented "Feign Humility" more than Federer which is why I always endeared more to Djokovic than Federer or Nadal, he was the crasher of the Fedal "Glamour Party" and A LOT of people didn't like it but I loved it.
Not that Alcaraz is like Djokovic in that sense but he has no issues saying out loud how good he is, or how much he needs to work on his game, and I can appreciate that as a fan.
Nadal likes to be humble with words because he likes predictable routines and an order to his life. He's not being fake, but acting in his interests. Djokovic seems to revel in chaos by comparison.None of the Big 3 were humble but Federer and especially Nadal hid it better than Djokovic who just didn't give a ****, he said what he wanted and didn't care what people thought. It was one of the reasons why I really liked young Djokovic, he sort of rebelled against the "clean cut" establishment of Fedal and wasn't scared of them one bit while the rest of the tennis world was bowing down to them and kissing their boots or tennis sneakers so to speak.
Alcaraz isn't as brash and outspoken as Djokovic but he isn't scared of anybody and he has no problem saying how good he is and can be. Sinner is more of the "aw shucks" type which is fine but is kind of generic and boring IMO.
Djokovic is done in best-of-five-set tournaments.Nole needs to put him on his freaking BACK.
He will grow again at Roland Garros and at Wimbledon his figure will be enormous.He will constantly come up short.
Best of three sets.He's getting closer. Did very well at Wimbledon to tamp down Djokovic in 3 sets.
Not sure what happened at the Olympics. Biggest letdown all year, and he knew it.![]()
Best of three sets.
Alcaraz was undoubtedly quite disappointing in not being able to win the gold medal in Paris 2024 after losing to an opponent 16 years his senior.
It's a shame that the Olympic final is a best of three sets.Lucky Djokovic, because Alcaraz was certainly going to win the next three sets and win 3 sets to 2.
Agree. I don’t think it’s likely to happen but it would be fantastic. It’s worth looking at given how much the status of Olympics tennis has grown in importance since players like Serena, Rafa, Murray etc etc prioritised it and made it much bigger.It's a shame that the Olympic final is a best of three sets.
It's a shame that the Olympic final is a best of three sets.
Deep down you're agree with himHe will constantly come up short.
Shortest player to win AO since Laver would be a feat.Deep down you're agree with him
Best of three sets.
Alcaraz was undoubtedly quite disappointing in not being able to win the gold medal in Paris 2024 after losing to an opponent 16 years his senior.
Well Lleyton Hewitt's initial struggles with Pete Sampras was the SIGN that lleyton hewitt was just a transitional great instead of a TRUE all-time great. Both jannik sinner's and carlos alcaraz's struggles against novak djokovic is very reminiscent of lleyton hewitt's struggles with pete sampras and andre agassi, but lleyton hewitt is also much closer in age to pete sampras and andre agassi than jannik sinner and carlos alcaraz are to novak djokovic which makes jannik sinner's and carlos alcaraz's struggles with novak djokovic even worse than lleyton hewitt's struggles with pete sampras and andre agassi. Completely contary to what the tennis media propaganda is telling us, the fact is that we are still in a transitional era and the next TRUE tennis great has YET to emerge.
Yes, Djokovic is very close to his final decline and, on the contrary, Sinner and Alcaraz are already on an upward curve, where they still have a significant amount of room for improvement.The trend is reversing. Before, Nole lost to the NextGen in Bo3 but beat them in Bo5.
Now, he's losing to Alcaraz in Bo5, but still winning their Bo3.
Still, I would think Alcarwz would be able to wear him out at this point, even in Bo3.