I think double digits is an upper-end prediction for anyone. Only 2 OE players before the big 3 got there.I def think at least getting to double digits is possible but mainly bc he won’t have peak big 3 to stop him, and he’s seemingly already figured out the gen in front of him.
50
Take it or leave it
It would be extremely annoying!Nadal, Djokovic and Alcaraz all being drawn in the same half at RG would be nuts.
52!50
Take it or leave it
Do you have a crystal ball so you can see that no player of similar quality to Alcaraz will emerge in 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027, 2028, 2029, 2030, 2031, 2032, 2033, 2034, 2035, 2036 and 2037?I think double digits is an upper-end prediction for anyone. Only 2 OE players before the big 3 got there.
That said, I do think it's possible given how much more technically, physically, and mentally solid he is than anyone else under 30. A remote possibility, but a possibility
It wouldn't be the first time, last year they were in the same half.Nadal, Djokovic and Alcaraz all being drawn in the same half at RG would be nuts.
Last year happened.It would be extremely annoying!
@duaneeo @Dominic & AndreyYou heard it here first. Alcaraz is a lock for the next 30 Slam titles. It's on him to lose any of them.
Why 30 though? Too low expectation. Should be 40+ in a row.You heard it here first. Alcaraz is a lock for the next 30 Slam titles. It's on him to lose any of them.
He may have somebody else to stop him, we dont know, look at federer, everything seemed to go swell for him, nobody could stop him anymore, and suddenly, bang, nadal appearedI def think at least getting to double digits is possible but mainly bc he won’t have peak big 3 to stop him, and he’s seemingly already figured out the gen in front of him.
You noticed!!!Djovak fans seem the most perturbed of all existing fanbases at the arrival of a new contender on the scene.
Not likely. 30 time slam winners don't struggle to get through two 40 year old geratrics far past their expiration date. Sure he'll get better, but hes going to have to get insanely better to win 30. 10 sounds good as other players will appear to challenge him around his age range
I'm not perturbed by Alcatraz. I'm perturbed by the ridiculous hype around anyone who strings together 3 good months.Djovak fans seem the most perturbed of all existing fanbases at the arrival of a new contender on the scene.
There are only two types of players on TTW:Goats and mugs.I'm not perturbed by Alcatraz. I'm perturbed by the ridiculous hype around anyone who strings together 3 good months.
Can he win a few Slams? Sure. What I hate is this binary we seem to have between "20+ Slam winner" and "mug"
So are you predicting that Alcaraz will win or not at least 30 slams (the next 30 in a row)?You heard it here first. Alcaraz is a lock for the next 30 Slam titles. It's on him to lose any of them.
I think someone about 4-5 years younger will come along that's better. Maybe his younger brother.tbh, he needs to win at least that amount to be compared to the big 3. Looks like he will have no rivals even close to their level.
Never.Let him win his first slam first.
Is there any reason why you spell tiny in Tiny Carlos not using a capital letter?I think someone about 4-5 years younger will come along that's better. Maybe his younger brother.
I'll join that team and he will dominate tiny Carlos and all the tiny Carlos glory hunters will be salty in the end.
I think that doesn’t depend much on what you can or can’t do.Never.
Sometimes he is just tiny. Sometimes he is Tiny.Is there any reason why you spell tiny in Tiny Carlos not using a capital letter?
Yes. If he doesn't win all of the next 30 Slams, he will be remembered as a failure just like FedererSo are you predicting that Alcaraz will win or not at least 30 slams (the next 30 in a row)?
You don’t need to state what will happen if he doesn’t, in that way you are nullifying your own prediction.
No, if he doesn’t win the next 30 slams, it’s you that will be remembered for your failed prediction.Yes. If he doesn't win all of the next 30 Slams, he will be remembered as a failure
Are you saying a measly 29 Slams wouldn't be a failure for Alcatraz? HaterNo, if he doesn’t win the next 30 slams, it’s you that will be remembered for your failed prediction.
Exactly. Let him win ONE at first and when he has won three, we can talk about 5-6. And then about the 10 plus territory. There is a reason there have been so few double digit slam winners in the entire OE. And if it looks like Alcaraz is a supreme talent with no peers in his age group for now, that could change quickly too. It looked like Fed was peerless for the first couple of years until Nadal started gradually clawing back his dominance and then Djokovic too broke through. There could be others to give Alcaraz company. We don't know who they are today but nobody knew in 2003 that Nadal and Djokovic would be the ones to stop Fed.10 is a reasonable target.
Aiming for more than that is silly right now. Tennis isn't a video game. Injuries can take their toll and other great players can come along and play even better.