Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by The Dark Knight, Jun 26, 2012.
You must be 15 or less
This is the righeous post ever.
I think you should change your name fro Vphuck to ImaPhuck.
All of Fedal's slams pre-djokovic were boring.
I think sports illustrated would disagree.....
2008 Wimbledon labeled greatest match of all time .
Too bad TDK will conveniently gloss over it.
Or play the game,"what, where? Post it for me please!"
Then he trolls you for eternity.
Rearing up your ugly head again, huh?
Gotta hurt when your true name got called out!
I see another priceless thread of yours "Nadal and Graf" today. Wow. Nevertheless, gotta wonder with so many younger female tennis players, why Graf?
Oh, these dark recesses of your fantasy?!!!
Keep on going though. Enlighten us more with your dazzling mind and knowledge.
And I think what you think is wrong. I don't think they will disagree, they just don't see it yet, but they will.
Thanks but FO 2009 with Fed as a winner still stands, boring or not. Arghhh, these ulcers will just not go away, will they not?
2008 Wimbledon .... Ouch.... U r Vphucked
Nadal's presence as a pro has concurred with every single slam that Roger has ever won. Rafa went pro in 2001. Fed won his first slam in 2003. Nadal had been playing as a pro for two years alreeady before Roger won his first slam. So, how can any of Federer's slams have been "pre-Nadal?"
Yup, but I'm NOT the one propping up thread after thread to bash Fed.
The last time I count, you had at least 2 for today? I'm wrong?
What's your next thread?
Dispel the myth...
How original your dazzling mind is?!
Are you still watching that Rafa-Soderling at FO 2009? What's your "throw in the mix now"?
Anything that Rafa didn't win, especially when Fed was the winner, is boring.
Hope that I'm wrong.
Your thoughts, TDK?
I agree but was just flaming the OP for him being silly.
2007 wimby second most exciting match of all time IMO .
2012 AO fourth most exciting ( Borg McEnroe is third )
The last Federer Rodduck Wimbledon when Nadal skipped it was really exciting actually....
Federer Bagjdatis ......687th
Federer Philopusis ...10,023
Federer Agassi .....80,00093
Federer Hewitt .....90,00054
Shall I go on......usually you need at 5 sets or a tiebreaker or something to make things exciting.
But Feds slams.....no competiton
Yeah ok....he was 14 In 2001. ( that's pretty amazing when you think about it)
I heard he beat Pat Cash on clay at 14.
OP, I think you've worn out your welcome with the TW poasters. Perhaps you should consider taking a break, and playing some ATP challengers in Florida and Europe? I heard they pay good cash, and as a cherry on top of the sundae, cause a lot of mourning and sadness due to your absence.
I suggest you strongly consider it.
There we go again with the "5-set-or crap" argument.
Not enough to start a thread and trolling everyone for X # of pages, you propped this one up and morphed it in the continuity of the other one.
There is Fed hate and there is TDK, isn't it?
Still ulcerating over that FO 2009. Stop watching the re-run and the ulcers will go away, trust me.
Someone suggested you to go away, train for some challengers since you're worn out your welcome here. Please don't let me be the one to say it.
Better yet, just watch tennis for its own sake. Good for your stomach too.
You think three sets in a grand slam are more exciting than 5 sets??
All the most exciting slams were five sets...
Nadal Federer 2007 2008
Joker nadal AO 2012
I can understand how Fed fans feel.
On the other V Phuck is welcome? I'm glad I'm on
The unwelcome side .
For you, 'exciting' means only when Rafa was the winner. Regardless of how long the match lasted. It could be one shot for that matter.
Sorry, perhaps it has to be to infinity since Rafa is a beast and no one can outlast him. Yup, I forgot that one.
Hey, be a tennis fan instead of a sick, twisted guy.
Grow up and grow out of your fantasies, would you?
I said the second most exciting match I've ever seem was Federer Nadal Wimbledon 2007 .....in fact here's my personal list of most exciting matches
1- 2008 Wimbledon
2- 2007 Wimbledon
3- Borg McEnroe the first Wimbledon
3- 2012 Joker Nadal AO
Contradicting the title of your own thread? Borg-McEnroe 1st Wimby, not pre-Rafa?
Weaving too much and you get lost in your own twisted logic, huh?
And why boring? Right, right, the weak era, no Djoker, Rafa hasn't developed yet, only lucky pretenders against Fed, perhaps Fed won in all 3-4 sets and not the >6 hr marathon as AO12...
All to say in your eyes, Fed achievements are simply pure luck. Yup, one lucky bast*** indeed.
Show us the pic of your time machine. The one you will use to right all the wrong done to your beloved Rafa
You didn't even watch borg x mcenroe. I could bet my house and my car on that.
I said all of Feds slams pre "Nadal".....where the contradiction ?
That list shows that you haven't watched tennis before 2008. There are soo many better matches, for both quality and drama, depending on what poison you want.
Those are my personal favorites.
What is so exciting about two guys grinding for 6 hours, when it could've have been easily been 4 at the most without time wasting?
I was getting tired of Fedal.....I love the holy trinity....
Can't wait to see who wins Wimbledon !
Nadal would be on 14 majors now if Djesus hadn't made an appearance. Grrrrr :evil:
I wonder why they called 2008 the greatest match of all time then?
You didn't think Borg Mcenroe was exciting?
I assume you're talking about the 1980 Wimbledon final? It's a good match, but I actually prefer the previous year's final between Borg and Tanner. Tanner's performance is one of the best in a major final for an eventual loser.
Yeah but Nadal is lucky....joker will force Rafa to improve his game.
Federer didn't really have that opportunity....and by the time nadal came along it was too late....because he was a bit stubborn to change.
Yes, in other ways it's more satisfying to see how Nadal has responded to the challenge in 2012 so far. He's come out fighting, big time. The Australian Open final was crucial, even though Nadal lost in the end.
I completely agree......
Nadal has never had a positive head to head against Joker on an HC.....
But he fought hard and was only a few points away from winning.
It was amazing to watch.
I think it was the highest level of tennis ever.
Its still boring really.. Who outside the top 3 are still even capable of winning a slam? ROFL It was worse in 2005-2007 though when you only had 2 guys winning everything.. Not at least its a 3 man horserace (kind of) instead of a 2 man race.
Wow.. I don't even want to think about how crummy this damn tour has been for the past 8 years.. How many guys outside of Nadal, Nole and Fed have even won slams in the past 7-8 years? It must be UGLY to look at
A handful of guys IF THAT.... Del Potro (1), Safin (1), Roddick (1) . I can barely think of much more. And two of those guys won a slam 7-8 years ago
...It was the same with Borg McEnroe connors
Post #17 and post #18 (your own words):"Was there tennis from 2003-2006? I must have missed it ."
Now claiming the Borg-McEnroe game exciting. Didn't it happen before 03-06?
Hard to keep up straight with all your arguments when you spew things out from both sides of your mouth, isn't it?
BTW, in response to your comment in post #18, here what I wrote, "Your comment showed us the TREMENDOUS DEPTH of your knowledge about tennis."
I have NOT changed my opinion yet.
And Federer would be on 20+ if not for Nadal
he'd have probably 22-24 slams.
no it wasnt.
Roger would have been on 18 slams if not for Djokovic. I mean who else could have taken possibly the AO 2008 and AO 2011?
Also, it's not a given that Roger would have lost to Rafa in US Open 2011..
oh ok so you would rather be a butt picker and an idiot who groans and moans and has no good speaking skills rather than a multi-lingual classy, elegant athelete who makes way more and is the face of tennis?? Oh ok that makes sense
or even wimby last year for that matter
You're going to be kicked out of Rafa's church, and the kicker will be none other than TDK. You're warned, my friend!
Wear good padding
No its fine the Devil doesnt have a church
Just read posts #32, 37, 38, and 48 in this very same thread.
To witness TDK greatness in eloquence! How he would flip-flop between the few posts.
Just give him enough rope to hang himself, would you?
Have mercy on his T DARK K soul!
Separate names with a comma.