Probably due to poor quality control. But interesting find.
There’s also the regular Japan only pro staff 85 with the words ‘db limited’ on the throat. This one weighs around 326g so similar to the lighter asian versions of the ps85.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's written in the paragraph on the throat (from inside), not on the buttcap.There is no indication made in Taiwan
How related are the 6.6 85 stars and stripes and the 7.0 85 white steffi Graf versions?
I have both, but from what I recall the 7.0 85 is 18x20.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
All racquets are her personal. (85 sq/in. 18x20)
https://d.kuku.lu/93db4694c8
Nice collection.
Are those all 85? I'm seeing the ncode 95 which I had it (16×18).
Thank you very much!!
nCode is paint job. Actually, 85 sq/in. 18x20.
You read my mind the other day until you posted it.What if this one is the first batch that was produced in Taiwan after closing the factory in St.vincent? The one that was made of unidirectional graphite not braided.
All racquets are her personal. (85 sq/in. 18x20)
https://d.kuku.lu/93db4694c8
Wow, what a collection. Very jealous. And all her 85 personal racquets? The 7.0 85 18x20 was available in Japan as a retail stick.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
![]()
This one is perhaps one of my favourites along with PSC 6.1 85 pj
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This one is light, right? Is it more flexible than other chinese ps 6.0 85?
Very nice collection by the way.
I'll annoy you with my usual questions as what I did to the others. Which one is the most flexible? Which one is liter? Which one is the most powerful?
I see all of it made in china except the classic one (made in Taiwan), right? Because the throat is narrower than others, specially the area between the throat & the handle.
Depends on condition and current market. Mint condition is worth a premium.How much is a Pete Sampras 1st St. Vincent manufacture worth? Based on the chart above it is a Version 3 in nice condition. The listing is also on **** for $5,000 however it may be signed. How much is Sampras signature worth?
Given its a Belgium version that did not have the red primer then the paint would probably not last as long especially at stress points like the throat junctions.I bought two belgian made Pro Staff 85 rackets last summer.
![]()
![]()
There are some measurement data from last stringing (2007) on both of them. One is clearly visible, the other is faded. Both have leather grips, grip size 4.
![]()
Do you know whats this is? Crack under the paint?
![]()
![]()
Hello @Pistol10 and everyone here, thank you very much for the great work you published here for us all. I'm in France and I know that PS85 owners here rely very much on your table and pictures which are definitely our main reference.Ok. Because many people don't know the differences between all versions of Pro Staff 85, I want to make this thread to show the differences in pictures.
I'll focus only on the main differences that you can detect easily in photos, other differences such as primary paint under paint job and the type of black color used for the paint job are really difficult to be detected in most photos, so I'll not mention it. Hope this will help who wants to buy one.
This is not complete,, I'm missing photos, I hope who has PS85 help us with some photos, and to correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks in advance to all. I'll keep updating this first post based on your posts.
This is a schedule below, you'll find all the editions. Note: one edition is missed which is the last "second" edition of made in Taiwan, I'll describe it and mention some notes at the end of this post.
![]()
1) Throat.
* Chicago (bumperless):
Side1: Tension rec 65-70lbs lable:
![]()
Side2: Empty.
![]()
* Belgium: (bumperless).
Side1: Only one lable on throat, tension rec 55-65lbs:
![]()
Side2: Empty, same as Chicago.
* St. Vincent 1 (bumperless):
Side1: Same as Chicago.
Side2: Empty, same as Chicago.
* St. Vincent 2 & 3 (100% The same paint job) :
Side1: Tension rec 55-65lbs lable:
![]()
Side2: Empty, same as Chicago.
* St. Vincent 4:
Side1:
Side2:
* St. Vincent 5: used by SAMPRAS (tension rec 50-60lbs printed on throat)
Side1:
![]()
Side2:
![]()
* Taiwan 1:
Side1:
![]()
Side2:
![]()
* Taiwan 2:
Side1: A recommendation of using Syn Gut was printed:
![]()
Side2: Same as Taiwan 1.
* China 1:
Side1: Note, Printed Pro Staff (first letter is capital letter) on the top :
![]()
Side2:
![]()
* China 2,3,4,5:
Side1: Note, printed "ProStaff6.0" on the top:![]()
Side2:
![]()
2) End of grommet.
* In general, Chicago, Belgium, All St. Vincent have a square shape (slight differences):
![]()
* In general, Both Taiwan & All China have a round shape (slight differences):![]()
Notes:
About the Taiwanese frames. There's 2 editions.
A_ The first edition is in the schedule. This one only was made of unidirectional graphite, not braided.
B_ The late edition. The same paint job, but Wilson added a recommendation of using Syn Gut.
Hello @Pistol10 and everyone here, thank you very much for the great work you published here for us all. I'm in France and I know that PS85 owners here rely very much on your table and pictures which are definitely our main reference.
One thing that we could add to the table is the year for each version, if it's relevant and identifiable. It would be very useful I think. In the thread @Sanglier explained that the first letter G in the 3-letter code corresponds to year 1984. So from this is it true to deduct the following years for the Chicago / St Vincent / Belgium versions ?
G for 1984
H for 1985
I : skipped and never used ?
J for 1986
K for 1987
For the Taiwanese and Chinese versions, is it possible to get the correspondance of the first letter with a specific year, or a period of X years ?
Hi from Paris, France to everyone ! Regarding the grip of the St Vincent, which Fairway grip was originally mounted ? I mean which size of the Fairway grip as there is Standard, Mid Size, Double Handed and maybe others. I couldn't find this confirmed anywhere. Do you know which width was originally used by Wilson for the PS 85 in the 80s ?
It's a little bit more complicated than that. On Wilson frames made from 1990 thru today, it's almost always the second letter that denotes the year of manufacture. Prior to that, it could be the first, or the second, or even the third letter. One of the other letters also tells you which factory made the racquet, though its position also shifted over the years, depending on the factory. I went into some detail on this system in another thread. If you are curious, have a look here from page 1 thru page 4. https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/ind...-classic-6-1-mutual-appreciation-club.569795/
As I mentioned before a number of times already (like a broken record), so long as the butt cap is original to the frame and the code is legible, you really don't need to get too hung up on all the cosmetic stuff when it comes to dating post-1978 Wilson products, unless you are specifically interested in collecting cosmetic variants. Exceptions to this system do exist, but they are exceedingly rare in my personal experience. Si vous avez encore des questions, n'hésitez pas à m'écrire en privé.
Buttcap code is: GFZ
Does this mean it was made in 2003 ?
Buttcap code is: SDP
I cannot figure out which country or year this one was made.
1991 makes sense. Sampras supposedly used the green/black pro staff 85 in a few tournaments in 1991, including the French Open.Yes. I believe this is the same frame you had shown in post# 900 here? https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/wilson-ps85-discussion-thread.240551/page-18
This is a 1991 (D) SanHoSun (S) product. A rare find!![]()
1991 makes sense. Sampras supposedly used the green/black pro staff 85 in a few tournaments in 1991, including the French Open.
Thanks. I don’t think I have ever seen these photos before.
0 new items by Benjamin Rio
photos.app.goo.gl
Hi is this a St Vincent Taiwan?
It's got a bumper so it can't be a chicago or belgium frame.
I remember him using that paint job on the spring and early summer 1991 and going back to his normal Pro Staff. Interesting the racquet they sold in the USA was a widebody dual taper beam that was awful and looked nothing like what he was using. Wilson did sell it in Japan as I remember some Japanese guys I knew using it and being shocked that Wilson didn’t sell that in the USA.Thanks. I don’t think I have ever seen these photos before.
Interesting that Sampras even tried using this racquet since he was known to not want to use paintjobs.
Also, I wonder if the limited edition version of the racquet sold to the public was similar to the version Sampras used in 1991 because it actually has some slight physical differences from a St. Vincent pro staff (and other pro staffs). The throat area is slightly more narrow.
I've seen the US version. Totally different and actually IS a wide body dual taper racquet that I think was 95 sq inches.I remember him using that paint job on the spring and early summer 1991 and going back to his normal Pro Staff. Interesting the racquet they sold in the USA was a widebidy dual taper beam that’s was awful and looked nothing like what he was using. Wilson did sell it in Japan as I remember some Japanese guys I knew using it and besting shocked that Wilson didn’t sell that in the USA.
Hi again,
Can anyone help please?