beltsman
G.O.A.T.
Federer: 1% - yes he lost many finals, but as the older gen he shouldn't have been put in that position. Plus denied a bunch. Injuries too.
Nadal: 5% - derailed many slams and also dealt with injuries. But same gen and couldn't stop Novak on HC since 2013.
Murray: 20% - same gen absolute failure
Thiem: 20% - the "prince" turned out to be a mentally weak failure who did nothing and bent over everywhere
Raonic: 3% - not a lot of talent but should have at least done something at Wimbledon, I guess
Dimitrov: 3% - never really had it
Tsonga: 3% - flawed failure
Wawrinka: 0% - enough said
Medvedev: 15% - bent over at AO and will bend over again, didn't even try
Zverev: 12% - absolute choking mug but at least he tried
Tsitsipas: 12% - absolute choking mug but at least he tried
Berrettini: 3% - pathetic player but limited in skill so can't be too harsh
Shapo: 2% - pathetic player but limited in brain so can't be too harsh
might not even equal 100 and I am probably forgetting players
Nadal: 5% - derailed many slams and also dealt with injuries. But same gen and couldn't stop Novak on HC since 2013.
Murray: 20% - same gen absolute failure
Thiem: 20% - the "prince" turned out to be a mentally weak failure who did nothing and bent over everywhere
Raonic: 3% - not a lot of talent but should have at least done something at Wimbledon, I guess
Dimitrov: 3% - never really had it
Tsonga: 3% - flawed failure
Wawrinka: 0% - enough said
Medvedev: 15% - bent over at AO and will bend over again, didn't even try
Zverev: 12% - absolute choking mug but at least he tried
Tsitsipas: 12% - absolute choking mug but at least he tried
Berrettini: 3% - pathetic player but limited in skill so can't be too harsh
Shapo: 2% - pathetic player but limited in brain so can't be too harsh
might not even equal 100 and I am probably forgetting players