<— select for larger image
I think I agree with what you are saying, but I'm not entirely sure what you mean by spiral spin or Z-Axis spin? To me it seems like you can define spin with two axises, call them X and Y, alone, where pure side spin is about the X axis and pure top spin or under spin is spin about the Y axis. In actuality most balls will be spinning with some combination of these two components. Is that what you mean by spiral spin?
I've always assumed the reason that a football does not change direction is because it's too heavy and spinning too slowly to have a noticeable effect. I would assume the Magnus Effect is still present. After all a tennis ball hit with pure topspin hit in the direction of spin will still bend - it bends downwards.
Thanks for the explanation.
Nope. Spiral spin (gyrospin) is a 3rd component. Most ball flights that we experience in tennis have negligible spiralspin so we can think the resultant spin axis as having only 1 or 2 components. However, the twist serve and some other specialty shots have this additional component. This type of spin is fairly common in ping pong and is often referred to as corkscrew spin (or simply, cork spin).
What I call Z-axis spin spiral spin) is the type of spin that has an axis of spin directly in line with the path of the ball. (Physicist, Rod Cross, might use a different axis naming convention). It is akin to Roll for a jet or airplane (Yaw corresponds to side spin and Pitch relates to topspin and backspin).
Think of the type of spin on a badminton shuttle or an American football (pass). Their spin axis is in the direction of flight. No Magnus Effect present for this type of spin. Rod Cross explicitly states this in his book,
Technical Tennis, and elsewhere. The weight of the football has nothing to do with the lack of left/right deviation. Badminton shuttles are very light and experience no left right deviation (unless acted on by a cross wind).
It is because shuttles and (American) footballs do not normally have a sidespin component, they do not experience a left/right bend in their trajectories. OTOH, soccer (futbol) players can often impart side spin to the ball so they can achieve this deviation.
Bend it like Beckham. Note that a soccer ball has a weight that is comparable to an American football.
With a vertical-axis sidespin, a high air pressure develops on one side of the ball and a low pressure develops on the other side — depending on which way the ball is spinning. The ball bends toward the low pressure side. This is the Magnus effect. For topspin, the higher pressure is on the upper half of the ball so the ball tends to dip down toward the lower pressure.
Where would the high and low pressures develop for a pure Z-axis spin? Pressure is the same in all directions for this type of spin = no net effect = no Magnus Effect.
For a ball spin with a negligible spiralspin component, the spin axis is merely some combination of a sidespin component and a topspin component. That resultant spin axis is in the XY plane which is perpendicular to the flight direction of the ball. However, with a significant Z-axis component, the resultant spin axis is no longer perpendicular. The late
Kathy Krajco spoke of this altered (twisted) spin axis for a twist serve on her excellent web site,
Operation Doubles. Sadly, her OD site was taken down some time after her passing. Much, but not all, is available as archived pages. Although Kathy wrote about the twisted spin axis, she did not refer to the 3rd spin component by name.
web.archive.org/web/20070928002805/http://www.operationdoubles.com/spindoctoringserve.htm
web.archive.org/web/20071023034536/www.operationdoubles.com/od-tennis_content.htm