Sunken cost fallacy means that people are likely to double down on a mistake instead of cutting losses. Classic example is you go to a movie and it's awful but you stick to the end because you paid for the tickets already. It's a psychological need to make the cost worth it somehow, even though you don't really want to watch the movie.
If it is a 1st round defeat then so be it, but if he doesn't even try for at least the AO that makes his prior decisions even more disastrous
But if he wasn't in the top 32 it would be a potential 1st round match with Fedal and that's irrelevant to who plays who amongst the top 4 seeds.That means a potential 4th round match with Fedal.
Sunken cost fallacy means that people are likely to double down on a mistake instead of cutting losses. Classic example is you go to a movie and it's awful but you stick to the end because you paid for the tickets already. It's a psychological need to make the cost worth it somehow, even though you don't really want to watch the movie.
In this case, Andy made a mistake in not doing surgery 6 months ago, and you're saying
So you're saying that playing AO will make his prior mistake "worth it". But it's not a good idea to play AO, if he wants to get healthy he needs to swallow the previous costs and have the surgery ASAP.
(All this assuming that surgery is in fact a viable option.)
I think there's no other option to be honest, his movement looks absolutely horrible at the moment.
I am saying that with or without playing the AO the only right decision is surgery.
In that light if he doesn't at least try to play AO then his previous decision is even worse.
![]()
The previous decision cannot get worse, is the point. nor can it get better. The months he tried to rest up and avoid surgery aren't coming back. He isn't well enough to play now.
The hip pretty much cements in my mind that Murray's promise never was fulfilled all these years due to back and now hip injuries. Murray before his prime did this to the GOAT:
11/2009 SF Indian Wells Masters Hard Andy Murray Roger Federer 6-3 4-6 6-1 2.25 - 1.74
2/2009 SF Doha Hard Andy Murray Roger Federer 6-7(6) 6-2 6-2 2.05 - 1.87
45/2008 RR B Tennis Masters Cup Hard Andy Murray Roger Federer 4-6 7-6(3) 7-5 2.20 - 1.65
42/2008 SF Madrid Masters Hard Andy Murray Roger Federer 3-6 6-3 7-5 3.55 - 1.36
35/2008 F US Open Hard Roger Federer Andy Murray 6-2 7-5 6-2 1.54 - 2.75
10/2008 R32 Dubai Hard Andy Murray Roger Federer 6-7(6) 6-3 6-4 4.20 - 1.20
33/2006 R32 Cincinnati Masters Hard Andy Murray Roger Federer 7-5 6-4 12.00 - 1.03
39/2005 F Bangkok Hard Roger Federer Andy Murray 6-3 7-5 1.04 - 19.50
6-2 against prime Fed; that was Andy Murray and why he got the Big 4 moniker from the press all those years ago.
No, the big four moniker for Andy Murray was wishful thinking and that 6-2 record against Fed is overrated luckily the non-prime Federer set the record straight.
If he plays and advances in the tournament even for round or two clearly it can get worse by not playing (if he could, but chose not to).
Whether he plays or not is now irrelevant for what he needs to do, so he might as well try.
That will give him the peace of mind that he tried everything he could and it didn't work.
Unless you are subscribing to the idea that a player should play a tournament only when he feels that he is 100 % ready for it, it makes sense for him to try to be competitive and see how far it will take him.
Giving up without even trying till the last minute can be fairly destructive for his mental state, given what lays ahead.
![]()
Okay, fair enough, but still doesn't have anything to do with previous decisions. I think he saw in expo that he wasn't ready. Also, I'm no medical expert but playing hurt could damage it even more and surgery isn't magic, the worse it is the less it can help.
That was not his ceiling lol. He couldve definitely won more, for sure.
The sad thing is he's not going to anymore
The draws that he won 3 times are not going to present themselves time and again
Anyways, no amount of talking on our part will yield an answer as to what he would do
Can you think of any other active player other than Nadal and Djokovic who chalked up a H2H against Federer like that?
Uhhh...Hewitt? I mean, if we're doing the thing where we ignore certain stretches of time? 7-2 at the start of their rivalry. Better than Murray's span, if seven is still a bigger number than six.
Doesn't this bring Hewitt's courage in keeping playing for so many years to front and center? Even now I don't think the guy gets enough credit for hanging in there.Yeah I think he's finished. But I don't see him not giving it another crack.
Would Murray be content with having a Lleyton Hewitt post 2006 career past this point? I don't know.
I did say active players. I'm well aware there are probably quite a few players who notched up impressive H2H s against Federer before he started to win Slams.
Hmmm. Murray really was quite something for much of 2009 and got to #2 ranking. Call it the Muzziah mystique, but looking back it is clear he was the most hampered by injury unless you want to count Novak's gluten intolerance an injury....No, the big four moniker for Andy Murray was wishful thinking and that 6-2 record against Fed is overrated luckily the non-prime Federer set the record straight.
Can you think of any other active player other than Nadal and Djokovic who chalked up a H2H against Federer like that?
None of them are active on the singles Tour.Hewitt, Nalbandian and Henmen![]()
None of them are active on the singles Tour.
I did say active players. I'm well aware there are probably quite a few players who notched up impressive H2H s against Federer before he started to win Slams.
Injuries would have done Murray in much earlier in other eras. It's only taken this long because of the advancements in medical technology.Huh? You doubt that Murray could win a couple slams over 30 when players like McEnroe, Wilander, Lendl, Becker and Edberg couldn't even win one?
What I don't understand is whether Murray has actually sort medical advice. How can Murray consider surgery on his own? No one goes to a surgeon and say they would like surgery; It would be for the specialists to decide whether surgery would be beneficial for that particular ailment or not.
What I don't understand is whether Murray has actually sort medical advice. How can Murray consider surgery on his own? No one goes to a surgeon and say they would like surgery; It would be for the specialists to decide whether surgery would be beneficial for that particular ailment or not.
Did you see the word 'consider'?I certainly hope Murray doesn't do surgery on his own, there are surgeons for that.
I did say active players. I'm well aware there are probably quite a few players who notched up impressive H2H s against Federer before he started to win Slams.
Did you see the word 'consider'?
This is what I said: "How can Murray consider surgery on his own?"
The title of the thread is:
Andy Murray withdraws from Brisbane, considers hip surgery
Normally, one would go and see a specialist who would be the one to decide what treatment is necessary. Murray can't go to a surgeon and say he'd like surgery on his hips.
Yeah, each of Murray's slams was tougher than 2017 USO.Who knows? He could have got a really cushy number like Rafa's at 2017 USO?
Murray has achieved all that he needed to achieve. He is the best 3 slam champion, he is the best British tennis player ever, he won not one, but 2 Wimb titles after a British drought of 77 years, he also became no.1, which is the biggest thing that was missing from his resume and he won the WTF too, which is something that ATG like Wilander and Nadal have failed to do.2016 Murray would certainly have been competitive. Not so any version since, of course.
We're happy with his record of course but we still want to see more and most of us think he would have been capable of a bit more. 30 is too young to end your tennis career these days with so many 30 plusses still active and competitive. There''s no way this isn't an unforeseen shock of the highest order!
More speculation on Murray
Andy Murray has enjoyed a stellar career, but now he should consider retirement
2 JANUARY 2018 • 5:55PM
- OLIVER BROWNCHIEF SPORTS FEATURE WRITER
![]()
Andy Murray is struggling with a chronic hip injury CREDIT: GETTY IMAGES
The rawness of Andy Murray, laid bare in those Centre Court tears with Sue Barker or in his savage mid-match chuntering about all the injustices of the universe, has shown itself once more. His latest Instagram screed, fleshing out the effects of a stubborn hip injury with words such as “demoralising”, “hurting inside”, and even including a picture of himself as a little boy, read less like a routine medical update than a cry for help. As a psychiatrist once said of Basil Fawlty: “There’s enough material here for an entire conference.”
This is no longer a fork in the road for Murray but potentially the end of the line. Hip trouble for tennis players is not just a problem that vanishes with scrupulous convalescence. Just ask Magnus Norman,..............................
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/tennis/2...as-enjoyed-stellar-career-time-has-come-quit/
He may well be right in the end but I don't want to hear it from HIM!![]()
karma for faking injuries so, so many times.
It seems over for him now.
Murray has achieved all that he needed to achieve. He is the best 3 slam champion, he is the best British tennis player ever, he won not one, but 2 Wimb titles after a British drought of 77 years, he also became no.1, which is the biggest thing that was missing from his resume and he won the WTF too, which is something that ATG like Wilander and Nadal have failed to do.
Right now, as long as Murray is still capable of performing at top 20 level, you should enjoy his presence.![]()
What I don't understand is whether Murray has actually sort medical advice. How can Murray consider surgery on his own? No one goes to a surgeon and say they would like surgery; It would be for the specialists to decide whether surgery would be beneficial for that particular ailment or not.
Hewitt, Nalbandian and Henmen![]()
Can you think of any other active player other than Nadal and Djokovic who chalked up a H2H against Federer like that?