Anybody watching Sabalenka's crazy serves in current match?

thisiscrazy

Semi-Pro
She is literally serving under 100km on first serves. Some serves are bouncing before getting to the net. Some are landing completely outside the doubles alleys. She's even doing a whole bunch of underhanded serves. I have never seen a professional lose all sense of how to serve like this.
 

TennisLurker

Professional
She is literally serving under 100km on first serves. Some serves are bouncing before getting to the net. Some are landing completely outside the doubles alleys. She's even doing a whole bunch of underhanded serves. I have never seen a professional lose all sense of how to serve like this.

it happened to Coria in the second half of 2005, before that he had a very good serve for his height
 

Dolgopolov85

G.O.A.T.
She is literally serving under 100km on first serves. Some serves are bouncing before getting to the net. Some are landing completely outside the doubles alleys. She's even doing a whole bunch of underhanded serves. I have never seen a professional lose all sense of how to serve like this.
Sounds crazy alright.
 

gogo

Legend
She's such a hot and cold player! What's up with that? (I ask this as a Canadian cheering for Shapo...so start the abuse now!)
 
D

Deleted member 788697

Guest
I am amazed that we can have threads without Djokovic in. I mean this is about Sabalenka, isn't it?
I know, I feel guilty when I don't talk about Djokovic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

gogo

Legend
Yep, Ivanovic had the yips bad for quite a while. Kournikova would have to have been the worst, it plagued her for years. She holds the record for the most double faults, 31 in one match. She served something like 180 double faults in 10 matches at one point.
I still feel that Sabalenka has more base talent, and physical talent, than either of those two.
Unfortunately she doesn't seem to be the brightest. Perhaps I'm wrong.
 

Aussie Darcy

Bionic Poster
I still feel that Sabalenka has more base talent, and physical talent, than either of those two.
Unfortunately she doesn't seem to be the brightest. Perhaps I'm wrong.
Food for thought:
Anett Kontaveit hired Sabalenka's former coach in August (Dmitry Tursunov). He took Kontaveit from #28 to #7 within 3 months, winning her multiple titles and getting her to the YEC. I wonder if Sabalenka is a bit salty that she let him go and saw how well he's done with Anett.
 

Dolgopolov85

G.O.A.T.
I still feel that Sabalenka has more base talent, and physical talent, than either of those two.
Unfortunately she doesn't seem to be the brightest. Perhaps I'm wrong.
I think her raw power gives that impression which makes us overestimate what she can do. But compared to both players, her movement even at the best of times has been wanting. I have seen a number of players win points by moving her side to side because she can't turn unit fast enough. That is, her height which gives (or gave) her a big serve and massive power is also a disadvantage when it comes to movement. And she could serve faster than she does but for the fact that her technique isn't great and she is merely leveraging her height. She is basically like a Del Potro of the women's game but with less talent (and much less heart). She is lugging all of her might into every shot which is ultimately an exhausting way to play. So her results up to this point aren't a surprise. Compare Sabalenka's forehand to Ivanovic's and Ivanovic was all easy power. It was beautiful technique and timing rather than muscle strength. That's why she could make deep slam runs in a tougher era than the one Sabalenka's playing in...and eventually win a slam too albeit her finalist that one time was weak.
 

gogo

Legend
I think her raw power gives that impression which makes us overestimate what she can do. But compared to both players, her movement even at the best of times has been wanting. I have seen a number of players win points by moving her side by side because she can't turn unit fast enough. That is, her height which gives (or gave) her a big serve and massive power is also a disadvantage when it comes to movement. And she could serve faster than she does but for the fact that her technique isn't great and she is merely leveraging her height. She is basically like a Del Potro of the women's game but with less talent (and much less heart). She is lugging all of her might into every shot which is ultimately an exhausting way to play. So her results up to this point aren't a surprise. Compare Sabalenka's forehand to Ivanovic's and Ivanovic was all easy power. It was beautiful technique and timing rather than muscle strength. That's why she could make deep slam runs in a tougher era than the one Sabalenka's playing in...and eventually win a slam too albeit her finalist that one time was weak.

Interesting take. I can't argue with you.
 
Top