InsideInForehand
Rookie
Is there anyone who uses or has used a Wilson K-Blade 98 and could tell how it plays. I read that it has a mold that is being used on the tour quite a bit. Anyone who can offer some more information?
Yepp. The black and gold one.Hi there, if your're referring to this one, I'll be hitting with it in about two weeks from now.
![]()
I'll keep this thread up-to-date.Yepp. The black and gold one.
To me, it was the best blade ever. 20mm beam, very fast. Great blend of power, control and spin. A bit on the stiffer side but does not feel harsh.Is there anyone who uses or has used a Wilson K-Blade 98 and could tell how it plays. I read that it has a mold that is being used on the tour quite a bit. Anyone who can offer some more information?
Is there anyone who uses or has used a Wilson K-Blade 98 and could tell how it plays. I read that it has a mold that is being used on the tour quite a bit. Anyone who can offer some more information?
Wow K-Blade. Went into Play it Again on a whim and found a well used but decent KB98 for $30. I've played a lot with pro stock Blades and V6 thru V9 retail Blade 98 (all 16x19), and this old KB98 feels the closest to my pro stocks. Retail V6-V9 all feel rubbery and vague to me on contact. V9 is really blah for me and for some reason has a surprisingly low launch angle for a 16x19. Not sure why.There’s still a lot of Wilson pro stocks based on the kblade mold. I’ve always wondered how similar the retail frame feels versus the pro stocks.
Interesting, now you’ve got me intrigued haha…I love the kblade pro stocks, they are the best combination I have come across in terms of feel, precision, and power. However, I no longer have access to get them through the source I was able to previously…and as I’m sure you’re aware, it’s impossible to track down replacement grommets for them. So I may have to pick up some old retail kblades instead. However, I usually don’t get along well with 18x20’s, but your comments about your experience has piqued my curiosity!Wow K-Blade. Went into Play it Again on a whim and found a well used but decent KB98 for $30. I've played a lot with pro stock Blades and V6 thru V9 retail Blade 98 (all 16x19), and this old KB98 feels the closest to my pro stocks. Retail V6-V9 all feel rubbery and vague to me on contact. V9 is really blah for me and for some reason has a surprisingly low launch angle for a 16x19. Not sure why.
I strung this KB with my usual Hawk 18, but three lbs lower than my 16x19 frames at 47/45 and could not believe how loopy a ball I was able to get out of the 18x20 stringbed. People say the KB feels stiff and crisp as Blades go, but maybe this one is just worn out, because it feels quite soft. And better feel than these modern rubbery Blades. This KB felt a tad less damped and "dense" than my pro stocks, but that could just be because the 16 year old foam in the frame is more brittle now than when new. I added 20g to the buttcap and no lead anywhere. 336 SW in playing form.
Anyway, I've never played with a 18x20 stringbed that put this much shape on the ball - more than I get with my 16x19 Blades. Weird and not sure why. I wish Wilson would just make Blades great again (and w/ glossy finish) like this old KB. And BTW it's the same 21 mm beam that all Blade 98s use.
Yeah the general lower launch of 18x20 is normally too much of an adjustment for me as well if I'm going back and forth, but I ordered another old KB just to make sure this is not a fluke. I've played with plenty of other 18x20s and this is just weird to me. I can't imagine the 3 lbs. lower tension really made that much difference, since 18x20 can handle lower tensions than 16x19 anyway. We shall see. I'm wondering if this frame has just lost stiffness and power to the point that it just doesn't sail the ball. But I really didn't perceive much power level difference from my other Blades. Obviously Blades are not power frames.I usually don’t get along well with 18x20’s, but your comments about your experience has piqued my curiosity!
This thread was started a few months ago. Considering I've seen threads that are 15-20+ years old get revived regularly, I wouldn't necesarilly consider this one to be that "Old"Old thread
Yep, 3 months to the day.Old thread
I have one and added lead at 3 and 9 as well and it plays great! Way better than any of the blades after v5 which is my favorite. The k blade does feel a bit firmer than the v5 but I like the raw feel.About a year ago, I acquired five of these in good condition and after some customization was considering using them exclusively. In my opinion, this is the most powerful blade layup in an 18 main pattern.
That being said, it is a bit anemic in the upper hoop unless you add some lead. Mine have Wilson leather and significant lead at three and nine to give it enough plow through to keep up with modern sticks. You’re not going to get a ton of spin production, but ultimately, the mains on the blade seem to produce more Spain than any other 18 main blade. Including its predecessor the nblade
In general like @dr325i mentioned, it’s crispy but flexy enough. A real hidden gem in the blade lineage
Curious because there's so much talk of it...
Through the Blade history, how has the mold actually changed?
Looks like Kblades were 20mm beam compared to the 21mm it has been quoted as for several generations, but is that the only change?
What about the Kblade mold, makes it so desirable to pro's?
I'm not talking retail, pro's obviously have their racquets customized, I mean the mold as a starting point?
Eventually, I did't get the KBlades due to miscommunication. Anyway, yes, I've played the V5 18x20, now the V5 16x19 and the grommet holes + parrallel drilling has led me manage doing the whole stringjob in less than 35 minutes with my drop weight machine. Super easy to string. More string movement for sure in comparison to a couple other 98s I've playing with now - the Elevate and DR98 -.In addition to the crispier layup this (look at photo below K vs V5 18x20)
Smaller grommet holes and smaller grommets make the sweet spot clearly defined (but smaller) - what makes it easier for rec players (big holes + big grommets) also makes it less desirable for pros.
Non-parallel drilling is one of the differencesCurious because there's so much talk of it...
Through the Blade history, how has the mold actually changed?
Looks like Kblades were 20mm beam compared to the 21mm it has been quoted as for several generations, but is that the only change?
What about the Kblade mold, makes it so desirable to pro's?
I'm not talking retail, pro's obviously have their racquets customized, I mean the mold as a starting point?
Don't know how the idea got started that the K Blade beam is thinner than other Blades.
Hello Konstantinos,Hi there, if your're referring to this one, I'll be hitting with it in about two weeks from now.
![]()
As I say above, I didn't get them eventually. There are 3-4 European "used stuff" websites that I visit to check what's available. You've got to pm me you email address to send links.Hello Konstantinos,
Where did you get those two precious Rackets. Could you tell me where to buy them?
Daniel
Because of racketfinder.com?
Have both - but my callipers are out of battery - I would probably guess they just used the Tour 93 Specs on the Regular 98.
![]()
Pro stock Blades are as close as you can get. Otherwise a weighted up new retail Blade, but the new gen retail Blades definitely don't have the same feel.Anyone know rackets similiar to the Kblade 98 18x20? Or where to find a few?
Any idea how to get them?Pro stock Blades are as close as you can get. Otherwise a weighted up new retail Blade, but the new gen retail Blades definitely don't have the same feel.
*Bay, Side line swap, pro stock tennisAny idea how to get them?
Anyone know rackets similiar to the Kblade 98 18x20? Or where to find a few?
Imo the Tfight 305 is close. Very close specs with the high balance and high TW/SW. Tfight harder to swing with the thicker beam.Anyone know rackets similiar to the Kblade 98 18x20? Or where to find a few?