Anyone who uses Wilson K-Blade 98?

Is there anyone who uses or has used a Wilson K-Blade 98 and could tell how it plays. I read that it has a mold that is being used on the tour quite a bit. Anyone who can offer some more information?
 
Hi there, if your're referring to this one, I'll be hitting with it in about two weeks from now.

k-blades.jpg
 
There’s still a lot of Wilson pro stocks based on the kblade mold. I’ve always wondered how similar the retail frame feels versus the pro stocks.
 
Is there anyone who uses or has used a Wilson K-Blade 98 and could tell how it plays. I read that it has a mold that is being used on the tour quite a bit. Anyone who can offer some more information?

A bit unstable, a bit stiff, but has some quick zip to it.

I guess it’s fine for someone that likes lighter rackets on the crisp side, but V8 is more solid and plush.
 
There’s still a lot of Wilson pro stocks based on the kblade mold. I’ve always wondered how similar the retail frame feels versus the pro stocks.
Wow K-Blade. Went into Play it Again on a whim and found a well used but decent KB98 for $30. I've played a lot with pro stock Blades and V6 thru V9 retail Blade 98 (all 16x19), and this old KB98 feels the closest to my pro stocks. Retail V6-V9 all feel rubbery and vague to me on contact. V9 is really blah for me and for some reason has a surprisingly low launch angle for a 16x19. Not sure why.

I strung this KB with my usual Hawk 18, but three lbs lower than my 16x19 frames at 47/45 and could not believe how loopy a ball I was able to get out of the 18x20 stringbed. People say the KB feels stiff and crisp as Blades go, but maybe this one is just worn out, because it feels quite soft. And better feel than these modern rubbery Blades. This KB felt a tad less damped and "dense" than my pro stocks, but that could just be because the 16 year old foam in the frame is more brittle now than when new. I added 20g to the buttcap and no lead anywhere. 336 SW in playing form.

Anyway, I've never played with a 18x20 stringbed that put this much shape on the ball - more than I get with my 16x19 Blades. Weird and not sure why. I wish Wilson would just make Blades great again (and w/ glossy finish) like this old KB. And BTW it's the same 21 mm beam that all Blade 98s use.
 
My youth racket - did quite some damage to people with this frame. And broke about 3 :D

It is definitely crispy and much less dampened than any Blade afterwards, but the 20mm beam keeps it from being too stiff. 18x20, but still quite lively stringbed. If anyone runs into a few of these frames that are in decent condition, let me know :)
 
Wow K-Blade. Went into Play it Again on a whim and found a well used but decent KB98 for $30. I've played a lot with pro stock Blades and V6 thru V9 retail Blade 98 (all 16x19), and this old KB98 feels the closest to my pro stocks. Retail V6-V9 all feel rubbery and vague to me on contact. V9 is really blah for me and for some reason has a surprisingly low launch angle for a 16x19. Not sure why.

I strung this KB with my usual Hawk 18, but three lbs lower than my 16x19 frames at 47/45 and could not believe how loopy a ball I was able to get out of the 18x20 stringbed. People say the KB feels stiff and crisp as Blades go, but maybe this one is just worn out, because it feels quite soft. And better feel than these modern rubbery Blades. This KB felt a tad less damped and "dense" than my pro stocks, but that could just be because the 16 year old foam in the frame is more brittle now than when new. I added 20g to the buttcap and no lead anywhere. 336 SW in playing form.

Anyway, I've never played with a 18x20 stringbed that put this much shape on the ball - more than I get with my 16x19 Blades. Weird and not sure why. I wish Wilson would just make Blades great again (and w/ glossy finish) like this old KB. And BTW it's the same 21 mm beam that all Blade 98s use.
Interesting, now you’ve got me intrigued haha…I love the kblade pro stocks, they are the best combination I have come across in terms of feel, precision, and power. However, I no longer have access to get them through the source I was able to previously…and as I’m sure you’re aware, it’s impossible to track down replacement grommets for them. So I may have to pick up some old retail kblades instead. However, I usually don’t get along well with 18x20’s, but your comments about your experience has piqued my curiosity!
 
I usually don’t get along well with 18x20’s, but your comments about your experience has piqued my curiosity!
Yeah the general lower launch of 18x20 is normally too much of an adjustment for me as well if I'm going back and forth, but I ordered another old KB just to make sure this is not a fluke. I've played with plenty of other 18x20s and this is just weird to me. I can't imagine the 3 lbs. lower tension really made that much difference, since 18x20 can handle lower tensions than 16x19 anyway. We shall see. I'm wondering if this frame has just lost stiffness and power to the point that it just doesn't sail the ball. But I really didn't perceive much power level difference from my other Blades. Obviously Blades are not power frames.
 
I currently play with a k blade prostock 18x20. Glossy RG paintjob. Beautiful frame.
305g 330 sw strung with that crappy orange wilson basegrip.
Been playing it with lynx tour at 50, leather grip and two overgrips. Great frame, crispy and raw feeling, no dampener needed.
Good power, not super great spin but adequate for an 18x20. I love them
 
About a year ago, I acquired five of these in good condition and after some customization was considering using them exclusively. In my opinion, this is the most powerful blade layup in an 18 main pattern.

That being said, it is a bit anemic in the upper hoop unless you add some lead. Mine have Wilson leather and significant lead at three and nine to give it enough plow through to keep up with modern sticks. You’re not going to get a ton of spin production, but ultimately, the mains on the blade seem to produce more Spain than any other 18 main blade. Including its predecessor the nblade

In general like @dr325i mentioned, it’s crispy but flexy enough. A real hidden gem in the blade lineage
 
About a year ago, I acquired five of these in good condition and after some customization was considering using them exclusively. In my opinion, this is the most powerful blade layup in an 18 main pattern.

That being said, it is a bit anemic in the upper hoop unless you add some lead. Mine have Wilson leather and significant lead at three and nine to give it enough plow through to keep up with modern sticks. You’re not going to get a ton of spin production, but ultimately, the mains on the blade seem to produce more Spain than any other 18 main blade. Including its predecessor the nblade

In general like @dr325i mentioned, it’s crispy but flexy enough. A real hidden gem in the blade lineage
I have one and added lead at 3 and 9 as well and it plays great! Way better than any of the blades after v5 which is my favorite. The k blade does feel a bit firmer than the v5 but I like the raw feel.
 
Curious because there's so much talk of it...

Through the Blade history, how has the mold actually changed?
Looks like Kblades were 20mm beam compared to the 21mm it has been quoted as for several generations, but is that the only change?
What about the Kblade mold, makes it so desirable to pro's?
I'm not talking retail, pro's obviously have their racquets customized, I mean the mold as a starting point?
 
Curious because there's so much talk of it...

Through the Blade history, how has the mold actually changed?
Looks like Kblades were 20mm beam compared to the 21mm it has been quoted as for several generations, but is that the only change?
What about the Kblade mold, makes it so desirable to pro's?
I'm not talking retail, pro's obviously have their racquets customized, I mean the mold as a starting point?

In addition to the crispier layup this (look at photo below K vs V5 18x20)

Smaller grommet holes and smaller grommets make the sweet spot clearly defined (but smaller) - what makes it easier for rec players (big holes + big grommets) also makes it less desirable for pros.

It has the SW of a old school frame, the stiffness of a new school frame but without the excess dampening and the well defined smallish sweet spot of a classic midsize frame.

It is THE SHARP BLADE... every blade since is dull in comparision. :-D

PXL-20240509-174929744.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In addition to the crispier layup this (look at photo below K vs V5 18x20)

Smaller grommet holes and smaller grommets make the sweet spot clearly defined (but smaller) - what makes it easier for rec players (big holes + big grommets) also makes it less desirable for pros.
Eventually, I did't get the KBlades due to miscommunication. Anyway, yes, I've played the V5 18x20, now the V5 16x19 and the grommet holes + parrallel drilling has led me manage doing the whole stringjob in less than 35 minutes with my drop weight machine. Super easy to string. More string movement for sure in comparison to a couple other 98s I've playing with now - the Elevate and DR98 -.
 
Curious because there's so much talk of it...

Through the Blade history, how has the mold actually changed?
Looks like Kblades were 20mm beam compared to the 21mm it has been quoted as for several generations, but is that the only change?
What about the Kblade mold, makes it so desirable to pro's?
I'm not talking retail, pro's obviously have their racquets customized, I mean the mold as a starting point?
Non-parallel drilling is one of the differences
 
Don't know how the idea got started that the K Blade beam is thinner than other Blades. I put the calipers on several Blade frames, and from hoop to throat the thickness varied between 20.8mm-21mm for K-Blade, 21-21.5 for V6, 20.9-21.3 for V9, and 20.9-21.3 for pro stock. I think the variations are in the finish thicknesses. The frames themselves are all pretty much visually indistinguishable aside from drill patterns which are irrelevant to the mold. I can't imagine the molds have much to do with differences in feel between versions and that it's pretty much layup and finish type.
 
Last edited:
Don't know how the idea got started that the K Blade beam is thinner than other Blades.

Because of racketfinder.com?

Have both - but my callipers are out of battery - I would probably guess they just used the Tour 93 Specs on the Regular 98.

Screenshot-20240519-103038.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Because of racketfinder.com?

Have both - but my callipers are out of battery - I would probably guess they just used the Tour 93 Specs on the Regular 98.

Screenshot-20240519-103038.png

I measured my Kblade, and it averaged at 21.0mm. I also check a pro stock V6 KBlade, same at 21.0mm. So yeah I believe their measurements are wrong
 
Anyone know rackets similiar to the Kblade 98 18x20? Or where to find a few?
Pro stock Blades are as close as you can get. Otherwise a weighted up new retail Blade, but the new gen retail Blades definitely don't have the same feel.
 
Anyone know rackets similiar to the Kblade 98 18x20? Or where to find a few?

its hard because i dont think anyone has clear insight on the mold changes

i would say try the BLX blade right after, although that one is softer/lower powered
 
Back
Top