N
Nathaniel_Near
Guest
Wait.. what??
A double fault?
What SORCERY IS THIS.
A double fault?
What SORCERY IS THIS.
This match is a new low for me. How a match that contains two tiebreaks can be this boring is beyond me. I mean, that's hard to do.
I stopped watching it. I don't care who wins this anymore. The winner will ge thrashed in the final by one of FeDals.
Berdych will never change ... this set was supposed to be his...
how do you work that out?
Several times 0-30 on Waw's serve, he was dominating the set until 6-6 then 2 DF lol
Similar pattern as Nadal-Dimitrov match in terms of scores
so a few 0-30's is dominating now?
Yeah I have to agree that Berdych had the upper hand for most of the set, but there's no counter to weighty gonads.
Given Berdych won more points than Wawrinka until 6-6 i guess yes that's called dominating.
And Nadal has the biggest of them all.
Is that a fact or an opossum?I hope 5555 doesn't join this thread.
Have they ever even played in a slam before?These two have never played a 5 setter against each other
Berdych wouldn't stand a chance against Nadal in the final (working on the assumption that Nadal gets there). At least Stan would fight, regardless of his depressing record against Nadal. Stan has belief, and persistence now.
Berdych wouldn't stand a chance against Nadal in the final (working on the assumption that Nadal gets there). At least Stan would fight, regardless of his depressing record against Nadal. Stan has belief, and persistence now.