AO in danger of moving to Shanghai / Sydney

joshuayuan

Professional

Tennis Australia boss Craig Tiley has revealed just how close Melbourne came to losing the Australian Open throughout the pandemic and warns continued development of Melbourne Park is required to ward off other cities.

In an exclusive interview with the Herald Sun, Tiley said foreign investors and governments had attempted to get the iconic tournament moved overseas during lockdowns.

Melbourne and Victoria suffered through one of the world’s longest lockdowns during the pandemic, with the Australian Open forgoing significant crowd numbers in 2021 and 2022 as a result.

Melbourne does have a contract to host the Australian Open until 2046.

“Yep – we had a lot of people interested,” Tiley said about the staging of the event during the pandemic.

“Private equity know that when it’s in good times it’s a very healthy business, very attractive for private equity.

“So there was quite a bit of interest and that was just the beginning of outside interest in the event. And you expect it.”

Tiley also stated that Sydney and Shanghai interests had put deals on the table to move the first Grand Slam of the calendar year.

“I know it was discussed and it was argued, absolutely,” he said about moving the tournament elsewhere during the pandemic.

“From a personal point, the Australian Open should always be in Melbourne – I’ve always advocated for that and I think it is a Melbourne event in my view.

“But I’m just one person.

“There is an organisation, there is a board, there are stakeholders and there is also the company for the future.

“There was a period back in 2010 when there was significant interest from Sydney and significant interest from Shanghai.

“To the point where proposals were put on the table around what it would take to move the grand slam to those cities.”

Since 2009, the state government has poured just shy of $1 billion into the redevelopment of Melbourne & Olympic Parks.

That was only completed earlier this year, but Tiley says more needs to be done to keep pace with the other Slams.

“We do need to develop another master plan and work with the state government on it,” he said.

“A lot of people will say, ‘Oh there is no need. We’ve just finished the redevelopment’.

“But you’ve got to do it now for the future.

“And there is going to be a need for another stadium, whether that be a refurbishment or a replacement of John Cain Arena, I don’t know but there will be a need for that.

“There will be a need for more courts, as the event grows onto a three week event.”

As a result of losing what Tiley says is essentially $80 million in cash reserves while staging the Australian Open in the pandemic, Tennis Australia is hoping to attract record crowds to next month’s tournament.

The 2023 Australian Open runs from January 16-29, with full capacity crowds returnig for the first time since 2020.
 
Hey, what about Basel?

Untitled-design-34.jpg
 
He's very obviously trying to extract more money from the state government. Hopefully they tell him to f-ck off because AO already has the best facilities in the world.
 
Tiley is resentful that he had to spend TA reserves quarantining those ingrates invited to AO 2021 at his expense, and now he wants to recoup the losses at governmental expense.
 
Tiley is bluffing with a handful of nothing

Tennis Australia will never let the AO go to China, and nowhere else in Australia is interested in building the facilities needed to run the tournament

It will stay in Melbourne indefinitely
 
He’s not wrong in one aspect, and that’s the need to start working towards what improvements may be needed in the future. If you wait until it’s needed to start planning, you’ll be way behind.

Note I’m not saying “start construction on January 30th”, but you do need to start planning now for future development (and be flexible as needs change).
 
The Sydney and Shanghai stuff was from 2010, and another talk about moving AO was also about during the pandemic. So it doesn't look like there's any 'danger' currently.
Though what is interesting is that the tournament is going to grow into a three week event ? I had no idea of that.
 
From a TV viewer perspective, AO is lightyears ahead of the other majors in terms of development of the tournament site. No other major currently has 3 roofs and numerous show courts like they do (new Kia Arena, Court 3, etc.), however, I do agree that John Cain Arena needs some significant work, or perhaps a replacement even.
 
Tiley is going to shanghai the AO. How unpatriotic! I think it's time for Tiley to move on. His public whining is losing him governmental support.
 
I mean I feel like if it would be anywhere it would be Dubai/Middle East if it was gonna be poached by anywhere around when the contract expires, they could probably pay the right people to get the decision made
 
The AO is not on contract. It is a part of the group of four slams under the ITF umbrella. I suppose TA could license it out if other slam members agreed, but they won't.

If TA moved the AO out of Australia, if it were at all possible, all hell would break loose, and tennis would probably lose every cent of funding from now and until the end of time.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top