AP report on Monte Carlo final

sureshs

Bionic Poster
Notice how Federer 1) admits lefty player will always trouble him 2) trash talks Nadal's serve

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Feat of clay: Nadal handles Federer again
No. 2-seeded Spaniard wins Monte Carlo Masters for 42nd straight clay win

Claude Paris / AP
Rafael Nadal won his second consecutive Monte Carlo Masters on Sunday, beating rival Roger Federer 6-2, 6-7 (2), 6-3, 7-6 (5).

Updated: 3:03 p.m. ET April 23, 2006
MONTE CARLO, Monaco - Rafael Nadal beat top-ranked Roger Federer 6-2, 6-7 (2), 6-3, 7-6 (5) Sunday to win the Monte Carlo Masters for the second straight year.

The second-ranked Spaniard extended his winning streak on clay to 42 matches, beating the seven-time Grand Slam champion for the second time this year. Federer, who had 78 unforced errors on his least-favorite surface, is now 28-2.

“It’s very special for me to defend the title,” Nadal said. “Beating Federer in a final is special, too. I was very aggressive with my forehand and I had a good touch.”

Nadal overcame a 3-0 deficit in the fourth-set tiebreaker and won the match with a forehand pass that bounced on the line.

“Congratulations and well played to Rafael,” Federer said. “I still had a great tournament, even though it did not end in a win. He totally deserved it.”

Nadal used his big forehand to pressure Federer on his weaker backhand, and the tactic frustrated Federer.

“He’s a lefty, so I’m always going to have problems,” Federer said.

Federer has lost the last four of five matches against Nadal, who beat him in the final at Dubai earlier this year and at the French Open semifinal last June.

“I enjoyed the battle against him,” Federer said. “I have answered some questions I had about how to play on clay.”

He would not say what those questions were, but feels he is “getting closer” to matching Nadal on clay.

Federer appeared in his 12th consecutive final, but his winning run in Masters series matches ended at 29. His previous Masters loss came against Richard Gasquet of France at the Monte Carlo semifinals last year.

Nadal won his second title of the season. He is four behind Bjorn Borg’s streak of 46 consecutive wins on clay. Guillermo Vilas leads with 53.

“This is good for me, to be third in history on clay,” Nadal said. “One day I’m going to lose. I hope it’s not next week (in Barcelona).”

Nadal also matched Spaniard Juan Carlos Ferrero’s feat of back-to-back titles in 2002-03 at Monte Carlo.

Federer started with a string of erratic shots that helped Nadal race to a 4-0 lead.

Federer finished with twice as many unforced errors as his opponent, and his first-set loss was the largest margin this season. His previous worst sets were 3-6 against Olivier Rochus, Nikolay Davydenko and Tommy Haas.

“I don’t care about the unforced errors, as I had no choice but to attack him,” Federer said. “I’m going to make errors because I’m the guy pressing.”
Nadal struggled throughout on serve, and Federer was upset that he converted only 4-of-18 break opportunities.

“That is a stat I care about,” Federer said. “He does not have a great serve. The outcome of the match could have been a lot different.”

© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 

fishuuuuu

Hall of Fame
sureshs said:
Notice how Federer 1) admits lefty player will always trouble him 2) trash talks Nadal's serve

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Feat of clay: Nadal handles Federer again
No. 2-seeded Spaniard wins Monte Carlo Masters for 42nd straight clay win

Claude Paris / AP
Rafael Nadal won his second consecutive Monte Carlo Masters on Sunday, beating rival Roger Federer 6-2, 6-7 (2), 6-3, 7-6 (5).

Updated: 3:03 p.m. ET April 23, 2006
MONTE CARLO, Monaco - Rafael Nadal beat top-ranked Roger Federer 6-2, 6-7 (2), 6-3, 7-6 (5) Sunday to win the Monte Carlo Masters for the second straight year.

The second-ranked Spaniard extended his winning streak on clay to 42 matches, beating the seven-time Grand Slam champion for the second time this year. Federer, who had 78 unforced errors on his least-favorite surface, is now 28-2.

“It’s very special for me to defend the title,” Nadal said. “Beating Federer in a final is special, too. I was very aggressive with my forehand and I had a good touch.”

Nadal overcame a 3-0 deficit in the fourth-set tiebreaker and won the match with a forehand pass that bounced on the line.

“Congratulations and well played to Rafael,” Federer said. “I still had a great tournament, even though it did not end in a win. He totally deserved it.”

Nadal used his big forehand to pressure Federer on his weaker backhand, and the tactic frustrated Federer.

“He’s a lefty, so I’m always going to have problems,” Federer said.

Federer has lost the last four of five matches against Nadal, who beat him in the final at Dubai earlier this year and at the French Open semifinal last June.

“I enjoyed the battle against him,” Federer said. “I have answered some questions I had about how to play on clay.”

He would not say what those questions were, but feels he is “getting closer” to matching Nadal on clay.

Federer appeared in his 12th consecutive final, but his winning run in Masters series matches ended at 29. His previous Masters loss came against Richard Gasquet of France at the Monte Carlo semifinals last year.

Nadal won his second title of the season. He is four behind Bjorn Borg’s streak of 46 consecutive wins on clay. Guillermo Vilas leads with 53.

“This is good for me, to be third in history on clay,” Nadal said. “One day I’m going to lose. I hope it’s not next week (in Barcelona).”

Nadal also matched Spaniard Juan Carlos Ferrero’s feat of back-to-back titles in 2002-03 at Monte Carlo.

Federer started with a string of erratic shots that helped Nadal race to a 4-0 lead.

Federer finished with twice as many unforced errors as his opponent, and his first-set loss was the largest margin this season. His previous worst sets were 3-6 against Olivier Rochus, Nikolay Davydenko and Tommy Haas.

“I don’t care about the unforced errors, as I had no choice but to attack him,” Federer said. “I’m going to make errors because I’m the guy pressing.”
Nadal struggled throughout on serve, and Federer was upset that he converted only 4-of-18 break opportunities.

“That is a stat I care about,” Federer said. “He does not have a great serve. The outcome of the match could have been a lot different.”

© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

I don't see the trash talking. He just says he doesn't have a good serve. I think it's okay, you know ... he knows what he's talking about ...
 

LowProfile

Professional
Well...Nadal doesn't have a great serve. It's not something he hits many aces off of or gets many service winners from. It is very consistent though, and Nadal's backcourt game allows him to win many of his service points, even if they're not off of great serves.
 

ericsson

Hall of Fame
compared to other great servers, its not a great serve cos he doesnt win easy points with it, federer, safin, roddick etc.. do
 

sureshs

Bionic Poster
I didn't say Federer was wrong, just that his comments seems to put down Nadal. Especially after calling him one-dimensional few days ago. Nadal doesn't go about saying that Federer doesn't have a great backhand.
 

diegaa

Hall of Fame
sureshs said:
© 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


I guess this doesnt matter to us.... ;)
 

In D Zone

Hall of Fame
Raffa totally owned Roger! Roger needs to continue to work on polishing his drop shots skills - which he said he hates. Roger had successes when he used it against Raffa. Although, Raffa is also great on digging out the low balls with a great passing shots. Raffa is too quick, drawing Raffa in more to the net and counter it with a lob just to keep Raffa off balance might be the answer. Roger should talk to Blake on how to play Raffa (after all Blake has won twice over Nadal).

Perfect # 1 and #2 match.... hopefully more at the French Open. :mrgreen:
 

Mr.Federer

Hall of Fame
Nadal has a really good serve. It's not the power or the aces for him, it's the placement and the mega kick. I was more afraid of Nadal's serve than rusedski's serve when I was behind the baseline "ball-boying". You never really knew where it was going to bounce and how high. People, if you haven't seen Rafa play live from a close distance, do not say he's got a weak serve unless your name is Roger Federer. And, I believe that Nadal finished first last year(atp) of hold of serve %.
 

Moose Malloy

G.O.A.T.
Interviews are up:

Q. You obviously felt you had to attack. You made a lot of what are supposedly called "unforced errors." Did you feel you had to try and keep the pressure on him all the time?

ROGER FEDERER: Well, I mean, he leaves me no choice. I'm not going to start looping the ball if he's in the middle of the box, you know. He obviously plays a lot of shots, you know, that tease you to come in. It's obvious I'm going to make the unforced errors because I'm the guy who's pressing and not him.

So, you know, the unforced error stat, I don't care really, seriously. That's what I was really actually angry about at the French Open, people telling me I was going for too much. They should play him and then see if they're not gonna go for it, you know.

No, I thought I played a smarter match today, and I was actually what I expected from myself, you know, that I got closer again a step. Especially on clay, I think that's very important.

Q. Three losses in a row against Nadal. Does it mean anything?

ROGER FEDERER: Well, I mean, I wish I could have won them, but they don't break down my will or hope or anything because what I care about is looking at the -- well, trying not to lose against him in Grand Slams, and then be ahead of him 2,000 points in the ranking, that's what I care about, and not really losing tonight. I made points against him, so he's under pressure.

But, yeah, it would have been nice to beat him. But I don't know, you guys have to have more to write about than I have to talk about. So this is for me one night and then I'll be on the road and I'll forget about it, so...

http://montecarlo.masters-series.com/en/players/interviews/stories/06_federer7.asp

That "2,000 point" comment sounds a bit defensive. Kinda like Sampras & the 10 slams comments re Rafter
 

shawn1122

Professional
"My forehand against his backhand is the best interchange"

lol at least he knows what gives Federer so much trouble.
 
Top