APDGT vs YTPM vs BLX 90

T1000

Legend
APDGT vs YTPM vs BLX 90 review

I got the chance to demo the Head Youtek Prestige Mid, Wilson BLXsix-one Tour 90, and the Babolat Aero Pro Drive GT. I thought I'd share my thoughts on the three since they are arguably the three most anticipated new racquets of 2010. The big three companies released their new editions of their flagship racquets and I'm in need of a new stick so why not start with these. Enough talk, here's my review, and as always don't take my word as the law, always demo and try them yourselves!

About me: I'm a 3.5-4.0 17 year old all courter. I play 4 singles for my high school and will be playing DI or DII tennis this coming fall. I'm around 80 in my section and 30 in the state. I consider my serve and volleys to be my strengths and my weaknesses are my backhand and mental game. I play with a Tecnifibre TFight 320 vo2 Max with lead at 3 and 9. I find the racquet is too powerful for me and lacks feel at the net. I'm looking for a racquet that has control and feel, but enough pop to help me out when I'm not feeling so strong.

First impressions: They all felt good in hand when I picked them up. I know that this is not an accurate impression of how the racquet will play but I found it interesting that they all felt great in the hand. Now onto the paintjobs. I love all of them. The all red on the prestige just looks amazing. The BLX also has a nice paintjob. It looks a lot better in person than it does online. It is really beginning to grow on me, but it is still not as good as the prestige paintjob. The aero pro also has a good paintjob. I'm a fan of red racquets but have had yellow/black racquets, like the rds 001 and rds 001 2008. I like how the black dominates the paintjob and the yellow comes into play, but not too much. It reminds me of the original aero pro, which I thought had a better paintjob than its cortex successor.

Groundstrokes: I tried the prestige first out of the three. I'm not a fan of 18x20 patterns since I have a hard time getting spin on my own. I definitely didn't think I would like it in such a small head size. I was trying this in place of the pro to see how the new technology came into play vs the Microgel Prestige Pro since the pro shop did not have a youtek pro demo. All I can say is wow. I loved hitting groundstrokes with this racquet. I got plenty of topspin with it, which surprised me a lot. My balls had a lot more kick when they landed compared to my old racquet. I found depth and pace easy to produce for a mid and tight pattern. I felt like Safin when I was going down the line on my backhand. I could feel an improvement there. Slices stayed nice and low with plenty of bite. The racquet was easy to maneuver and felt whippy, which I liked. Touch was really nice, I could feel the d3o working in this racquet. Definitely a positive experience. I tried the BLX next and had no trouble adjusting. I was letting the mass of the racquet do the work and getting plenty of pace and control. Lasers to the corners were easy to hit. My slices were staying up a little to much for my liking, not a lot of bite compared to the prestige. Touch was solid with this racquet, and the maneuverability wasn't to bad, but I would have to play with this racquet alone to get used to it. The Babolat was next. The groundstrokes were just awesome. Effortless pace, spin, and depth. It was just unbelievable. I felt like I could hit a forehand winner whenever I wanted to. It was easy to maneuver. Unfortunately like most babolats, I felt that the feel was not that good. It's an improvement over the last one for sure but still not up there with the best (in terms of feel).

Volleys: The prestige had an amazing touch of power and feel. It could hit drop volleys on a dime or drive volleys to the corners for winners. It was stable at net and held up against heavy passing attempts. I found not trouble getting the racquet around, it was really easy to move. I was not impressed with the BLX. It felt sluggish at net and I found myself late on volleys. Touch and power were awesome as was stability, but the maneuverability did not impress me. The Babolat was an improvement over all babolats I've tried at net. I found this one had the most feel out of every Babolat I've tried. Compared to the other two it lacked in feel, something I think is essential since volleys are my strengths. It was hard to move and it was stable. Power was good as usual but I wish this one had more feel.

Serves: The prestige was solid here again. Flat serves were bombs and I loved hitting a slice out wide, into the body, or down the middle. I didn't try kick or topspin serves so I can't really comment on those. The BLX had awesome flat serves but I felt it lacked bite on slice serves. The Babolat served bombs, both with flat serves and slice serves. I really enjoyed serving with this one.

Returns: I did not hit that many returns with any of these racquets so it would be unfair for me to comment on them.

Overall: These are all solid frames. I recommend everyone to try at least one of these. The new technologies are definetly an improvement over the previous models in my opinion. I liked the Prestige the best followed by the APDGT then the BLX 90. I'm going to try the prestige pro, mid, and APDGT again.

Power
1. APDGT
2. BLX 90
3. YTPM

Control
1. YTPM
2. BLX 90
3. APDGT

Maneuverability
1. YTPM
2. APDGT
3. BLX 90

Stability
1. APDGT
2. BLX 90
3. YTPM

Comfort
1. YTPM
2. APDGT
3. BLX 90

Touch/Feel
1. YTPM
2. BLX 90
3. APDGT

Serves
1. APDGT
2. YTPM
3. BLX 90

Groundstrokes
1. APDGT
2. YTPM
3. BLX 90

Slice
1. YTPM
2. BLX 90
3. APDGT

Topspin
1. APDGT
2. BLX 90
3. YTPM

Volleys
1. YTPM
2. BLX 90
3. APDGT

Overall
1. YTPM
2. APDGT
3. BLX 90

Ranking the racquets was tough; they were all very close and solid in each category. Just because it's third doesn't mean it's bad.
 
Last edited:
-No trouble going from a 95 sq in head to a BLX90?
-How was the BLX90 for the 1HBH if u use one?
-What did u like least about the BLX90?
-So u think the BLX90 is better than the K90?
-How many times did u shank it with the BLX90?

Sorry for all the BLX90 questions, I'm on the fence with it atm. Awesome review dude :)
 
-No trouble going from a 95 sq in head to a BLX90?
-How was the BLX90 for the 1HBH if u use one?
-What did u like least about the BLX90?
-So u think the BLX90 is better than the K90?
-How many times did u shank it with the BLX90?

Sorry for all the BLX90 questions, I'm on the fence with it atm. Awesome review dude :)

Thanks man

1. I used to always use mids (rds 001, rds 001 2008, rdx 500, n90, k88, rdis 100) so I had no trouble adjusting.It has a pretty large sweetspot, as long as you have good technique it shouldn't take long to adjust.
2. I have a 2 hander but for some reason I hit a one hander when using wilson mids. I really liked it for the one hander. If you let the mass of the racquet do the work you can get awesome plowthrough and power. Topspin was a little hard for me to get but a one hander isn't my normal back hand.
3. The thing I liked least was the maneuverability. It was to sluggish for me, especially at net. If I played with this racquet everyday it would not be a problem. After that it's a really solid racquet, really nothing wrong with it.
4. I hit with a k90 briefly so I;ll give it my best shot. I thought I had more power with this racquet but I've also gotten a lot stronger in the last 12 months so that definitely had something to do with it. I thought the k90 was easy to move though and I had more control with it. Through my experience the blx has more power but less control and spin potential. Other people say they're basically the same racquet with a different feel. This is probably true, but since I grew a lot and my game improved a lot over the past 12 months it's difficult to give an accurate answer.
5. I didn't shank that much with the blx. I was switching with another mid so I was used to the small head size for the playtest. In a real match I would have had some trouble but again I need to play solely with this racquet to get used to it.

Hope this helps. If you have any more questions feel free to ask or shoot me an e-mail through my profile if you want to keep it private
 
Indeed that was most helpful, thanks bro. Just thought a future DI/II college player could give be some good insights :)

I already demoed the BLX90 once but sometimes u need to hit it along side with others u like. Also, as weather permits I'm hitting more, & more against a variety of top players. So as I'm finding my form again, I'll probably give the BLX90 another go at it. I didnt find it heavy and I didnt mishit, but just had to take full swings to find the baseline (not a bad thing esp if u swing out anyways).
 
Sry if I missed this but, do you know what these demos were strung with? thx

Sorry, I should have added the specs in my OP.

BLX 90
stock specs
1 Kirschbaum touch II overgrip
Wilson Hollow Core Pro @ 57 lbs (17g)

YTPM
Stock specs
no overgrip
Gamma Asterik Tour @ 57 lbs (16g)

APDGT
stock
no overgrip
Some multi or syn gut, name is blurred at 60 lbs, I'm guessing 16g, can't really tell
 
Sorry, I should have added the specs in my OP.

BLX 90
stock specs
1 Kirschbaum touch II overgrip
Wilson Hollow Core Pro @ 57 lbs (17g)

YTPM
Stock specs
no overgrip
Gamma Asterik Tour @ 57 lbs (16g)

APDGT
stock
no overgrip
Some multi or syn gut, name is blurred at 60 lbs, I'm guessing 16g, can't really tell

if the BLX was strung with HCP you might want to try it again strung with something else, I demoed the 6.1 95's and I probably wouldn't have switched of they had both been strung with HCP, thankfully one was already strung with Lux and when I turned the demos back into the shop the guy insisted that I take them out again when he strung them with something different
 
Hi T1000, What made you change from your RDS mids? Is the Pretige THAT much better?

I never really felt comfortable with them. They played different than the yonex mids I was used to. It just didn't have the same feel as the rds or rdx series. I then played with the Microgel Prestige Pro and felt the same thing. I just couldn't connect with it for some reason. Now I'm using the Youtek Prestige Pro and love it.
 
if the BLX was strung with HCP you might want to try it again strung with something else, I demoed the 6.1 95's and I probably wouldn't have switched of they had both been strung with HCP, thankfully one was already strung with Lux and when I turned the demos back into the shop the guy insisted that I take them out again when he strung them with something different

The shop I demoed from only strings wilson frames with HCP for some reason. I asked about it and they said they would string it differently but I would have to pay, which would be anywhere between $40 and $70. I'm pretty happy with my Pros right now, I'll probably try the blx again when I'm stronger and better
 
The shop I demoed from only strings wilson frames with HCP for some reason. I asked about it and they said they would string it differently but I would have to pay, which would be anywhere between $40 and $70. I'm pretty happy with my Pros right now, I'll probably try the blx again when I'm stronger and better

So your'e sticking with the Prestige Pro rather than the Youtek Prestige Mid which you recently demoed and gave a review?
What are your thoughts on the differences between the Youtek Prestige Pro and Mid?
 
Last edited:
Great review T1000.

I really enjoyed reading your experience with the YT Prestige Mid, I'm actually considering trying one( Mid or Pro ). The fact is that my current racquets have similar specs to the PPro, but with a tighter string pattern( 18x20 ). Not sure if I'd enjoy having similar racquets.
 
So your'e sticking with the Prestige Pro rather than the Youtek Prestige Mid which you recently demoed and gave a review?
What are your thoughts on the differences between the Youtek Prestige Pro and Mid?


I tried the mid because I wanted to see how the new prestige felt, I wanted to try the pro but they only had a mid instock the first time. I went back again and used both side by side to see which one I liked better because I really enjoyed hitting with the mid, which is unusual because I dislike tight string patterns.

I felt the pro was more consistent on groundstokes. What I mean by this is I could get spin, power, and depth almost all the time while on the mid I got more mixed results. On volleys both were amazing. I liked the mid a little bit more because I liked the increase control. Depth and power were easy to obtain on both. Feel was also good on both. These are both solid volley racquets, you can't go wrong with either. On serve I have to give the Pro the slight edge. Power was easy on both, but I got more spin with the Pro.

To me, the Pro had more spin potential and was easier to use. If I was good enough to get consistent results with the mid I would probably be using it right now. You really can't go wrong with either racquet. I recommend demoing both since I thought they were very similar.
 
Is the YT PRestige mid easier to use than the BLX tour 90? I'm thinking of getting one(a yt prestige mid)

I thought it was easier to maneuver, serve, and volley with. I got more power and spin with the blx 90. You have to be at the top of your game to use both since they aren't easy racquets to use. If you want something easy to swing and you bring your own power I would get the mid. If you want plowthrough and have no problems with swinging a heavy racquet I would get the blx. I would demo though, you don't want to buy the wrong racquet.
 
Great review T1000.

I really enjoyed reading your experience with the YT Prestige Mid, I'm actually considering trying one( Mid or Pro ). The fact is that my current racquets have similar specs to the PPro, but with a tighter string pattern( 18x20 ). Not sure if I'd enjoy having similar racquets.

Thanks man, and definitely try both of them. I had a lot of fun playing with both of them. I'll probably pick up a mid over the summer to hit with. You really can't go wrong with either frame because they're so solid
 
Back
Top