@schmke If you don’t mind, what is the current language on medical appeals and what is your take on my situation?
appealing down
trust me there is no auto-appeal at 60. A good friend just went through this and was denied based off his dynamic rating.
So, there actually is an auto-appeal, but the "auto" isn't a given, there are criteria to be met.
Here are the relevant sections from the 2023 regulations:
2.05E(1) Any player who is 60 to 64 years of age or older prior to, or during, the calendar year in which
such player plays his or her first local league match and has achieved the same rating level or lower for
his or her three most recent year-end ratings, without benefit of an age-related appeal of the player’s
year-end rating level, if promoted will automatically be granted an appeal (A rating) of their current rating
back to their previous valid year-end rating level, subject to 2.05E(5) below. NTRP Dynamic
Disqualification procedures as outlined in 2.04B(3) apply.
2.05E(2) Any player who is 65 to 69 years of age and has not been granted an age-related appeal of their
year-end rating level in the last three years, if promoted, will automatically be granted an appeal (A rating)
of their current rating back to their previous valid year-end rating level, subject to 2.05E(5) below. NTRP
Dynamic Disqualification procedures as outlined in 2.04B(3) apply.
2.05E(3) Any player who is 70 to 79 years of age and has not been granted an age-related appeal of their
year-end rating level in the last three years, will automatically be granted an appeal (A rating) of their
current rating to the next lower level, subject to 2.05E(5) below. NTRP Dynamic Disqualification procedures
as outlined in 2.04B(3) apply.
2.05E(4) Any player who is age 80 or older and has not been granted an age-related appeal of their
year-end rating level in the last five years, will automatically be granted an appeal (A rating) of their current
rating to the next lower level. NTRP Dynamic Disqualification procedures as outlined in 2.04B(3) apply.
2.05E(5) Any player who is clearly above level under the applicable Computer Methodology procedures, as
defined in the Glossary, will be denied an appeal of his or her year-end rating under 2.05E(1), 2.05E(2) and
2.05E(3).
The criteria to be met changes slightly depending on the age, and in all cases players cannot be "clearly above".
Oddly the 2024 regulations doesn't have 2.05E at all, but instead has this:
2.05E(1)–(5) that described the eligibility criteria for players 60 and older to
appeal their rating down have been removed from the 2024 USTA League
Regulations. The opportunity for these players to appeal their rating has not changed.
The player can appeal their rating with a few clicks, and will receive an immediate
answer, based on the criteria programmed into TennisLink. As such, the specific
criteria are not needed in these regulations.
I read that to say the same criteria is still used, they just aren't documenting it. I'm guessing the USTA got too many questions and wanted to simplify it, go click appeal, and what happens happens, no documented rules to nitpick?