Bender
G.O.A.T.
I wrote this a few years ago for Ezine Articles:
In the early 1990's, I attended my first Professional Tennis Registry (PTR) training session in Lacey, Washington. The instructor introduced me to a terrific slice approach shot. He consistently hit shots deep into the court that stayed so low they were almost impossible to retrieve. He gave me the opportunity to demonstrate the shot and it was difficult for me to get the shot to consistently clear the net. Especially, if someone dropped a shot very close to the net with almost no pace on the ball.
To produce an effective baseline forehand stroke, I start with my weight on my back foot and then I smoothly transfer my weight to my front just before making contact with the ball. If I were to use this technique near the net, I would have trouble getting the ball to clear the net, because it seems to rise much too slowly. The technique my PTR instructor taught me solved the problem. However, I had to make one adjustment; I decided to use topspin rather than a slice stroke for my approach shot. The instructor taught me to put my weight on my back foot (my dominant foot, because it is on the same side as my dominant hand); but instead of smoothly transferring my weight to my front foot, he taught me to jump off of my back foot, kick out with my front foot, and strike the tennis ball while I am airborne. The glide-hop motion would be akin to a lazy man's track hurdling technique.
Over the years, I have successfully hit balls that have dropped as close as 3 to 5 feet from the net. When you use this approach shot, it gives you supreme confidence in your ability to win points. You will be able to hit blistering approach shots that give your opponent little time to recover. Always hit your approach shots down the line so that you can effectively bisect the angle of your opponent's passing shots.
To practice this approach shot technique, you need to stand in your normal forehand position and raise your non-dominant foot (the foot on the same side as your non-dominant hand) about 12 inches in the air. Find a spot on the court approximately five feet in front of where you are standing. This will be your landing spot. Jump from your present location to the landing spot. Your non-dominant foot should land squarely on the spot with your body weight still moving forward. If you jump and land basically in the same spot, then the shot would have been done incorrectly and you will over hit the ball causing it to land out-of-bounds. The actual contact with the ball has to be made while you are airborne and moving toward the net. The more distance you cover, like a track long jumper, the more successful the shot will be.
My approach shot has given me a license to kill. A license to kill tennis balls that is. After sitting in an office all day, I don't want to be nice to tennis balls, not even the ones landing near the net. If you follow this technique your approach shot will become beyond reproach. Most of your opponents will think twice about dropping the ball short when playing you. This precaution will not just be for their own sake, but also for the sake of the poor little tennis ball.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/7803762
Disclaimer:
This is from my experience and I am not trying to take credit for any new tennis paradigm
Sent from my SM-A102U using Tapatalk
All other things being equal, I have to open my racquet face more [to get more angle upward] and hit it more softly so that that increased loft doesn't cause the ball to go long.
How high is the ball when you make contact? Below knee height?
If you jump, it will be that much more difficult hitting a low ball, which is the scenario I envisioned from your description ["I would have trouble getting the ball to clear the net, because it seems to rise much too slowly"; this wouldn't be a problem with a high ball]. Jumping I would think would exacerbate your problem of clearing the net and not going long?
I'm having trouble visualizing how this stroke would work. Any clips you can reference?
I'm familiar with the hop where you push off with your back foot but you don't kick out with the front.
Doesn't that make it more of a drop shot than an approach? In the beginning, you explained that the demonstrator's approaches were so good in part because they went deep. Hitting so the shot lands 3' from the net seems like it would land short.
I agree that DTL is best from a geometry standpoint. However, if that means I'm hitting to his FH and his FH is considerably better than his BH, maybe I want to go CC to his BH.
At the very least, I don't want to "always" do something because then my opponent can anticipate what I'm about to do. The exception is if the tactic works more often than not; then I don't care if I'm being predictable.
Sounds fairly complicated; a demo would be nice. I can't recall any high-level player executing this so I have no reference.
I have no issues with dealing with hitting forehands off knifing slices that skid off the ground, but I use a vastly different (and more conventional) approach.
- Optional: Run around backhand
- Plant on dominant leg, in neutral stance, knees very bent
- Lean forward from the hip so your chest is pointing around 45+ degrees to the ground
- Hit normal forehand from this position--this should result in your hitting shoulder also dipping 45 degrees or so compared to the non-dominant shoulder
- Optional: Use reverse forehand finish, especially if you've had to dip your shoulder a lot
- (together with step 4) Transfer weight from dominant leg to non-dominant leg, and push up
- Pivot on your left foot as you push up with your non-dominant foot, OR lift off into the air with your non-dominant foot and land on the same foot