I hear very often that a 1HBH is called "best BH in tennis". like gasquet,wawrinka or almagro now for example. a few years ago even many called federers BH the best (although he ran around 70% of his BHs). I understand that they are aesthically pleasing and look better, but I think commentators don't give enough credit to the 2 handers. of course every once in a while gasquet hits a 100 MPH BH winner down the line and all guys are in awe but if you consider consistency all the best BHs in the last decade have been 2 handers. but I have hardly seen a commentator praising nalbandians, safins, novaks or murrays BH like they did with the one handers. Is there a bias toward one handers because it's more "old school" and cool looking?