Depends on what you consider crispness and power.
I was testing all of these on a Wilson PS 97 RF A. My reference string job is Solinco Tour Bite 1.25mm strung at 24/22kg. I changed to a full bed of poly because a wasn't able to control fast and spinny balls anymore (previous string was mainly Signum Pro Fibre Touch for almost 20 years, completly underrated string, by the way). I like crispness and sacrificed power for control, but I can swing freely. That is my goal and Tourbite does offer plenty. (i'm testing right now and found Tecnifibre 4S to play pretty nice...)
I was testing these multiesters as I'm still concerned with keeping my arm save from harm. But typical multis don't offer the control I'm looking for. All of these strings offer more power than poly and more control than multi. Too me, they feel more homogeneous than a hybrid string job.
All of the above are way softer than my reference string but offer similar grabbiness and more power (with Mutltifeel I had to hold back a little). But I didn't lack control.
I never had such penetrating shots when playing with the NXT. Control of depth, height, and spin was insane. Multifeel is similar, but to me, felt a little bit softer. Triax is everything of the above dialed up a little. HDMX is the cheaper brother of Triax, but played way worse (but still great). But when they broke, they broke for real and splintered all over the court. I'm not fully convinced, the built concept of Triax & HDMX is fully thought through.
I find those strings vastly superior to a hybrid string setup or full bed of multi. However, durability is non-existent, at least for the way I like to play (flatter shots, high rpm, depth). Although polys still feel relatively uncomfortable to me, I trust them to last longer. With unlimited ressources, I would have switched immediately. I used the biggest gauge available but none of these strings lasted two complete competitive matches (for reference Tourbite 3, Fibre Touch 2 plus 1 double).
)
