Article: "Federer Still Fears 'difficult to beat' Nadal at French Open"

AngieB

Banned
http://www.businessinsider.com/afp-federer-still-fears-difficult-to-beat-nadal-at-french-open-2015-4

Federer still fears 'difficult to beat' Nadal at French Open
AFP
Stuart Williams, AFP
Apr. 27, 2015, 12:33 PM



Istanbul (AFP) - Switzerland's 17-times Grand Slam winner Roger Federer on Monday said he still believed Rafael Nadal was the favourite to win the French Open next month despite the Spanish star's troubled start to the clay court season.

Federer, who took his sole French Open title in 2009, this week is refining his own clay court game at the Istanbul Open, the first ATP World Tour event to be held in Turkey and the first time that Federer has visited the country.

But Nadal, who with the exception of Federer's win has taken every French Open since 2005 to make nine in total, has shown a dip in form over the past weeks, failing to get past the third round at last week's Barcelona Open.

Federer said he believed that Nadal was still the man to beat on the red clay of Roland Garros, along with the in-form Serbian world number one Novak Djokovic.

"At the French Open, Rafa for me is still the favourite alongside Djokovic who has been playing so well.

"Even though his (Nadal's) form is not as good as in previous years, I still believe when the French Open rolls around he is going to be very difficult to beat," he told a news conference in Istanbul.


Federer, 33, is himself looking for his own form on the slower clay after a long hard court season, having lost in the third round to Gael Monfils at the Monte Carlo Masters this month. But he said the Istanbul event was ideal for his preparations.

"It's about getting used to the sliding, deciding how aggressive I want to play," said the world number two.

"I have been on hard courts for seven-eight months so it needs some adjustments.

"My game is going to get better and better as we move along."

Federer, who so far has been unable to add to his sole French Open win in 2009 and won his last grand slam at Wimbledon in 2012, acknowledged that this year's French Open "is clearly a big goal of mine".

"But to play well at the French Open I need confidence. I hope that I can pick that up in Istanbul."

Federer, who celebrated his arrival in Istanbul by thumping a ball into the Bosphorus that divides Europe and Asia, is the star attraction in the Turkish mega city along with the Bulgarian world number 11 Grigor Dimitrov.

With Federer seeded one and Dimitrov two, the pair are slated to meet in the final in Istanbul. After receiving byes for the first round they should begin their campaigns from Wednesday.

Federer, who has played two impromptu practice sessions with Dimitrov since arriving at the weekend, paid tribute to the Bulgarian as having a game "similar to mine" -- athletic with a one-handed backhand.

But Federer said his own experience showed now was the time for Dimitrov, 23, to knuckle down and go into "overdrive" to break into the world's elite.

"He (Dimitrov) has improved a lot in the past few years. I still believe he has a lot of improvements to make.

"He has just got to take the right decisions in the next few months and years on how exactly is he going to crack the top five, because it's a big step.

"He needs to put in extra effort now and just go into overdrive," said Federer.

Musing on his own long career, Federer said he had taken the right decisions at the right time, especially when he first became number one in 2004.

"Number one was a big deal and I decided I wanted more of it... I am happy I took that decision otherwise I would have many regrets. I just have minor ones."
 
I actually disagree with Federer this year, but he is still right in that Nadal will be difficult to beat.
 
Do you disagree about Nadal being the favorite? Or Djoko? Or both?

I would honestly call Djokovic the favourite right now. That could change depending on Madrid and Rome, and I do understand why people say that until Nadal loses at RG he's the favourite, but this year really feels different to me. Djokovic is on fire, and Nadal looks completely lost. even more so than last year, IMO.
 
Nadal is more lost than usual and Djokovic is actually more on fire than usual.
 
I would honestly call Djokovic the favourite right now. That could change depending on Madrid and Rome, and I do understand why people say that until Nadal loses at RG he's the favourite, but this year really feels different to me. Djokovic is on fire, and Nadal looks completely lost. even more so than last year, IMO.
I would agree so far but I think I'm waiting until Rome/Madrid to make that call. We all know that Nadal is capable of playing much better on clay and it is not impossible yet he will turn that switch on. If he plays the same as he has lately, then of course you are right and a lot of other players than Djoko would have a decent shot at the upset.
 
It's not rocket science that Djokovic is the favourite to win RG right now.

I know many nadal fans who gets pi s s ed when saying that, and goes to the usual tiresome argument ''Buuutt Nadal looost in MC last yeaar tooo, and djokovic was also the fav. then, but nadal still woon'' duuuuhh.

When someone is the favourite, it doesn't mean they will win.
 
It's not rocket science that Djokovic is the favourite to win RG right now.

I know many nadal fans who gets pi s s ed when saying that, and goes to the usual tiresome argument ''Buuutt Nadal looost in MC last yeaar tooo, and djokovic was also the fav. then, but nadal still woon'' duuuuhh.

When someone is the favourite, it doesn't mean they will win.

He is the favorite. Not sure why anyone would be mad over it :p
 
Federer usually knows what he is talking about, unlike other pundits like McEnroe, Wilander, etc...
 
It comes from being an active player I think. As soon as Federer retires he'll be as clueless as the rest of them. :)

Ah, so Federer is better than ever then. When he retires he'll talk about how he declined as he got older.
 
I would honestly call Djokovic the favourite right now. That could change depending on Madrid and Rome, and I do understand why people say that until Nadal loses at RG he's the favourite, but this year really feels different to me. Djokovic is on fire, and Nadal looks completely lost. even more so than last year, IMO.

This. It's always rather humourous to see people handicap 2015 based on results from 2005 or 2008.

The reality is that 52 week rankings don't lie, and Nads has posted a slew of bad losses for the past 9-10 months.

Unless you believe he has a magical pill or transformative can of spinach, Nads appears to look troubled to make it out of the first week of RG.

Gotta love Fred's trolling, too - there's no way he wouldn't want to face Nads at RG to give him some payback.

If Fogs and Fiasco can burgerize ******, Fred can too.
 
He is the favorite. Not sure why anyone would be mad over it :p

How can he be the favorite when he's never won it and Nadal has won it NINE times!?

It doesn't take a rocket science to realize that, no matter how badly you may think Nadal is playing at the moment, he will turn it on when it really matters and win the French Open. History has shown that he does that every year.

Honestly, he could have zero wins from the end of 2014 to now, and I'd still put him as the favorite ahead of Djokovic by a considerable, comfortable margin.

Just doesn't make any sense at all to put someone who's never won a tournament as the favorite to win it.
 
How can he be the favorite when he's never won it and Nadal has won it NINE times!?

It doesn't take a rocket science to realize that, no matter how badly you may think Nadal is playing at the moment, he will turn it on when it really matters and win the French Open. History has shown that he does that every year.

Honestly, he could have zero wins from the end of 2014 to now, and I'd still put him as the favorite ahead of Djokovic by a considerable, comfortable margin.

Just doesn't make any sense at all to put someone who's never won a tournament as the favorite to win it.

Would you peg Sampras as more likely to win Wimbledon at this point over someone like Raonic/Dimitrov?

Naturally, Nadal's proven history at RG ensures that he should still be considered as a strong contender for the title; but form of the moment and the last year is also very much relevant, and the oddsmaker sure seem to think that this is enough to make up for the players' respective histories at the tournament, making Djokovic the slight favorite.

I think that's rather fair. It seems close to a toss-up for me, judging from what I have to go by.
 
Nadal is crying secretly. He thought the loss at Barcelona lowered expectations but now the pressure is back on!
 
Nadal is crying secretly. He thought the loss at Barcelona lowered expectations but now the pressure is back on!

:lol:

Expert-troll Fred trying to unsettle Nadal, letting Djokovic win RG to protect the slam-record. What unspeakable genius. What unspeakable arrogance 8)
 
Unless I missed it, I don't think Federer used the word "afraid", or "fear" in his statements. Typical media B.S. He was being diplomatic and truthful. Rafa has to be the favorite until someone proves otherwise.
 
I would honestly call Djokovic the favourite right now. That could change depending on Madrid and Rome, and I do understand why people say that until Nadal loses at RG he's the favourite, but this year really feels different to me. Djokovic is on fire, and Nadal looks completely lost. even more so than last year, IMO.

I agree with you. It feels a little different to me this year as well but there is a long way to go and a player of Nadal's caliber may be able to find his groove for the FO after playing Madrid and Rome. Djokovic is the favorite but Federer is right that when the FO rolls around, Nadal may still be the man to beat. The fact that Djokovic has lost so many times vs Nadal (something Federer is all too familiar with) has to weigh on Djokovic's mind and he may have a mental block at the FO. Sometimes great players simply can't win slams on all surfaces no matter how hard they try and no matter how good their seasons are--i.e. Lendl at Wimbledon, Borg at the USO, Sampras at the FO, etc. We will have to see what transpires in the next few weeks.
 
Nowhere in that article does Federer say or imply he fears Nadal would win the FO. He says, plainly, that
"Even though his (Nadal's) form is not as good as in previous years, I still believe when the French Open rolls around he is going to be very difficult to beat."

It reads like pretty much a matter-of-fact comment to me, one which is based on the previous decade of examples.
 
This. It's always rather humourous to see people handicap 2015 based on results from 2005 or 2008.

The reality is that 52 week rankings don't lie, and Nads has posted a slew of bad losses for the past 9-10 months.

Unless you believe he has a magical pill or transformative can of spinach, Nads appears to look troubled to make it out of the first week of RG.

Gotta love Fred's trolling, too - there's no way he wouldn't want to face Nads at RG to give him some payback.

If Fogs and Fiasco can burgerize ******, Fred can too.

Sorry, that is silly talk. If Nadal is good enough to get to Federer at the FO, there is little chance Nadal would lose to Federer. Let's get real. :-?
 
Sorry, that is silly talk. If Nadal is good enough to get to Federer at the FO, there is little chance Nadal would lose to Federer. Let's get real. :-?

Yes, it was silly. Federer at the FO against Nadal is the usual: Professor Nadal's class in session.
 
This. It's always rather humourous to see people handicap 2015 based on results from 2005 or 2008.

The reality is that 52 week rankings don't lie, and Nads has posted a slew of bad losses for the past 9-10 months.

Unless you believe he has a magical pill or transformative can of spinach, Nads appears to look troubled to make it out of the first week of RG.

Gotta love Fred's trolling, too - there's no way he wouldn't want to face Nads at RG to give him some payback.

If Fogs and Fiasco can burgerize ******, Fred can too.

What do you mean? :)
 
"Number one was a big deal and I decided I wanted more of it... I am happy I took that decision otherwise I would have many regrets. I just have minor ones."

What do you think his minor regrets are ?


p.s. silly thread title. OP should have made it slightly consistent with the content instead of running with the article's title.
 
Sorry, that is silly talk. If Nadal is good enough to get to Federer at the FO, there is little chance Nadal would lose to Federer. Let's get real. :-?

This is the reality: Headmaster Fiasco and Vice Principal Fognini have routinely pwned Nads this year.

And even in the anals of their pigeondom, they never -- never -- spanked professor Nads with a bagelous paddling. Fred has.

That's also the reality.

As is this: that formerly overdeveloped fellow whose career has degenerated into hiding after hiding from former pigeons sure looks to be exiting his former playground rather early.

Varhainen.

Se todellisuus.
 
This is the reality: Headmaster Fiasco and Vice Principal Fognini have routinely pwned Nads this year.

And even in the anals of their pigeondom, they never -- never -- spanked professor Nads with a bagelous paddling. Fred has.

That's also the reality.

As is this: that formerly overdeveloped fellow whose career has degenerated into hiding after hiding from former pigeons sure looks to be exiting his former playground rather early.

Varhainen.

Se todellisuus.

Yes, I am not disputing any of that. What I am saying is that if Nadal is in good enough form to make it to Federer at the FO, I can't see him losing to Federer. I think if Nadal goes out, he will go out much earlier.
 
p.s. silly thread title. OP should have made it slightly consistent with the content instead of running with the article's title.
Why change the title from it's original article so a discussion group participant would have something else to chronically whine about? #Duh.
smallbus

#PTL #JC4Ever

#AngieB
 
How can he be the favorite when he's never won it and Nadal has won it NINE times!?

It doesn't take a rocket science to realize that, no matter how badly you may think Nadal is playing at the moment, he will turn it on when it really matters and win the French Open. History has shown that he does that every year.

Honestly, he could have zero wins from the end of 2014 to now, and I'd still put him as the favorite ahead of Djokovic by a considerable, comfortable margin.

Just doesn't make any sense at all to put someone who's never won a tournament as the favorite to win it.

Of course, because you're a troll with a cracked mask on.
 
Yes, I am not disputing any of that. What I am saying is that if Nadal is in good enough form to make it to Federer at the FO, I can't see him losing to Federer. I think if Nadal goes out, he will go out much earlier.

I see your point, but as Nads tumbles farther and farther, any draw can happen.
 
9hhhnR9.jpg
 
A matchup with Federer at this point would tell us everything we need to know, because Nadal has always played at a very high level against Federer regardless of prior form. So, if he couldn't raise his level for that matchup, stick a fork in him.
 
It's not rocket science that Djokovic is the favourite to win RG right now.

I know many nadal fans who gets pi s s ed when saying that, and goes to the usual tiresome argument ''Buuutt Nadal looost in MC last yeaar tooo, and djokovic was also the fav. then, but nadal still woon'' duuuuhh.

When someone is the favourite, it doesn't mean they will win.

I don't know why some of Djokovic' fans insist on wanting Djokovic to be the favourite every time vs. Nadal. You do realize you don't actually win trophies by being the favourite? Same goes to the Nadal fans who object when people say Djokovic is the favourite. It means absolutely eff all.

Let Djokovic be the favourite from here on to eternity.

Djokovic is the best player of the world.
Bless.
 
A matchup with Federer at this point would tell us everything we need to know, because Nadal has always played at a very high level against Federer regardless of prior form. So, if he couldn't raise his level for that matchup, stick a fork in him.

I agree with this. IF Fed and Rafa meet in the FO, and Fed beats Rafa, then we know for sure. Losing to Ferrer, Verdasco and Fognini is one thing, BUT, as great as Fed is, he must have a hell of a mental mountain to overcome when facing Rafa (especially) on clay - that is why I think it would be a much more significant loss (if it happens, which I doubt, but we'll see):)
 
I don't know why some of Djokovic' fans insist on wanting Djokovic to be the favourite every time vs. Nadal. You do realize you don't actually win trophies by being the favourite? Same goes to the Nadal fans who object when people say Djokovic is the favourite. It means absolutely eff all.

Let Djokovic be the favourite from here on to eternity.

Djokovic is the best player of the world.
Bless.

Who wants it? People are just stating the obvious. If you read my post again, I also say being a favourite doesn't mean you will win.
 
A matchup with Federer at this point would tell us everything we need to know, because Nadal has always played at a very high level against Federer regardless of prior form. So, if he couldn't raise his level for that matchup, stick a fork in him.

On hard court Fed had the edge but Nads evaded him at IW. In Monte Carlo Fed actually went out ealier than Nadal. If you ask who else is not having a good clay season that would be Fed.
 
Objectively speaking, Djoko is the 1st favorite, Nadal 2nd, and Nishi 3rd.

I do not know where is Federer in that department, but he is surley higher than Murray.
Same conundrum as last year. Do you go with current form or history at that particular tournament? This year, I am not ready to get into such arguments so I'd say Nadal/Djoko are co-favorites. You simply cannot put a 9 time title holder as 2nd favorite. And if his form improved to the extent of winning one of the remaining clay masters, it would become a no-brainer to pick him as 1st favorite. The only case scenario when I may consider bumping Nadal to 2nd favorite- despite his history at RG- is if he lost before final in all masters (AND Djoko had a strong showing in another master).
Barcelona is not significant enough to propel Nishi to 3rd favorite status. Only if he wins 1 of the masters (or reaches semi/final in both) would I consider doing that. Otherwise, he'll be a dark horse at best.
 
How can he be the favorite when he's never won it and Nadal has won it NINE times!?

It doesn't take a rocket science to realize that, no matter how badly you may think Nadal is playing at the moment, he will turn it on when it really matters and win the French Open. History has shown that he does that every year.

Honestly, he could have zero wins from the end of 2014 to now, and I'd still put him as the favorite ahead of Djokovic by a considerable, comfortable margin.

Just doesn't make any sense at all to put someone who's never won a tournament as the favorite to win it.

Pete Sampras is the favorite to win Wimbledon compared to Dimitrov.
 
Sampras is not on the tour.

But if he was on the tour I'd pick a 37 year old Sampras to win Wimbeldon over a 26 year old Dimitrov any day

I wouldn't.

I actually believe Murray has a decent shot at Wimbledon, and Dimitrov is not out of the equation either. Everybody seems to have forgotten Murray is still out there.
 
Back
Top