If she is a great volleyer then he can't be the next Federer.You heard it here first. Very crafty, great volleyer, very calm and is hardly sweating, bagels manufacturer.
If he is a great volleyer then he can't be the next Federer.
'She' then. My point is still valid.Really? If HE. Ash Barty is a WTA player.
Yeah, cause Fed is such a poor volleyerIf she is a great volleyer then he can't be the next Federer.
YepYeah, cause Fed is such a poor volleyer
![]()
Huh? She only just returned to tennis in the middle of 2016 after leaving the sport for cricket. Start of this year was ranked outside the top 200 and is now going to be top 20. Oh and she's also top 20 in doubles and made a slam final... she has a nice game however, she is nowhere near consistent enough
Great tennis player, 16/17 and reached 3 grand slam doubles finals in one year. Amazing! Then she just dropped it all in September. Wish she would come back
My posts from 2015 and 2016 from an 'Ash Barty next GOAT' thread (I didn't create the thread, that was @smoledman way back in 2013 after she made 3 slam doubles finals. She's been on quite a few radars for some time, and as an Aussie I'm loving it!Fantastic to see i'm not the only Aussie following her progress! Great stuff that you got to see her @Oz_Rocket
[And I do hope she becomes famous and gets back to the top 10!
I'm going to the Fed Cup in Brisbane in April and really hoping to see her there. Whether playing or supporting the girls in the crowd!
If she is a great volleyer then he can't be the next Federer.
I bet I started watching tennis long before you were born.You ever watch tennis before? Give it a go, great fun
Really? If HE. Ash Barty is a WTA player.
If she is a great volleyer then he can't be the next Federer.
whatIf she is a great volleyer then he can't be the next Federer.
Exactly what I said. Federer volleys every now and again but is not the most successful even in this era. That player is Rafael Nadal.what
Oh ffsExactly what I said. Federer volleys every now and again but is not the most successful even in this era. That player is Rafael Nadal.
If she is a great volleyer then he can't be the next Federer.
Just show some stats proving that Fedr is a great volleyer let alone the greatest.What an absolute clown you are.
If she is a great volleyer then he can't be the next Federer.
and you are not thinking straightYou heard it here first. Very crafty, great volleyer, very calm and is hardly sweating, bagels manufacturer.
Is that why you said Agassi never won a clay major?I bet I started watching tennis long before you were born.
Fine, she’s the next Nadal then. Will probably retire in her next ten hard court tournaments.Exactly what I said. Federer volleys every now and again but is not the most successful even in this era. That player is Rafael Nadal.
Exactly what I said. Federer volleys every now and again but is not the most successful even in this era. That player is Rafael Nadal.
Just show some stats proving that Fedr is a great volleyer let alone the greatest.
Exactly what I said. Federer volleys every now and again but is not the most successful even in this era. That player is Rafael Nadal.
in Federer-Nadal matches, federer still has a clearly higher % of net points won, even with him approaching almost thrice as Nadal.
(We have net stats for 29 of their 38 matches.)
Federer at net on 17% of all points, has won 604 of 947 (64%)
Nadal at net on 6% of all points, has won 198 of 323 (61%)
(a total of 5643 points played in these matches)
https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/ind...-in-his-grand-slam-finals.432432/post-7718217
I was off tennis from the Agassi/Sampras/Fedr era because Borg/McEnroe/Connors/Edberg was a hard act to follow until Rafael Nadal saved the day.Is that why you said Agassi never won a clay major?
![]()
Show me the official stats.inspite of nadal going in clearly easier volleys on average and having slightly better passing shots than Federer, he's still behind Federer in terms of success% at the net.
stop deluding yourself.
Show me the official stats.
Come on, Federer is better at the net, no need to dispute that, Nadal can't be the best at everything. There are also other things Nadal can do and Fed can't.Show me the official stats.
I was off tennis from the Agassi/Sampras/Fedr era because Borg/McEnroe/Connors/Edberg was a hard act to follow until Rafael Nadal saved the day.
Don’t use logic. The poster cannot compute such inconceivable ideasCome on, Federer is better at the net, no need to dispute that, Nadal can't be the best at everything. There are also other things Nadal can do and Fed can't.
It's just that people for some reason are biased towards certain talents. Nadal said that running fast is also a talent.
I don't really know what the reason is why people are biased towards certain talents. This is about all sports and was even before Federer, so it's not the delusion of Fed fans.
Don’t use logic. The poster cannot compute such inconceivable ideas