mike danny
Bionic Poster
Who's gonna win it this year? Defending champion Zverev is out as well as Novak Djokovic. Fortunately, Rafa will greet us with his presence.
If Montreal is anything to go by, guessing the winner is a stab in the dark. With any luck Rafa will be able to get a few matches under his belt as a warm up for the USO but I’m managing expectations with him for this tournament, despite wanting him to win the whole thing.Who's gonna win it this year? Defending champion Zverev is out as well as Novak Djokovic. Fortunately, Rafa will greet us with his presence.
I usually only include the top 8 seeds in tournament thread polls.If Montreal is anything to go by, guessing the winner is a stab in the dark. With any luck Rafa will be able to get a few matches under his belt as a warm up for the USO but I’m managing expectations with him for this tournament, despite wanting him to win the whole thing.
@BGod might tell you off for not including Kyrgios in your poll lol
As do I but got a telling offI usually only include the top 8 seeds in tournament thread polls.
I usually only include the top 8 seeds in tournament thread polls.
I tagged you in good humour btw, and in truth you do have a point. However, it is reliant on the OP’s interpretation of who should fill the remaining spots in a poll if you only pick the top 4 automatically. That in itself may result In disagreements.Kyrgios is currently 4th in USO futures at 8-1. But you don't include him in your poll because, reasons? Unless you know he won't play Cincy entirely.
And reasons? You realize that top 8 seeds are not universal for all surfaces, let alone crowds, scheduling, momentum, etc, etc.
It is only advisable to include all top 4 seeds due to how the draws are made but after that one REALLY should look at context less your poll turns out like a riot which in Montreal it certainly did. But whatever.
I tagged you in good humour btw, and in truth you do have a point. However, it is reliant on the OP’s interpretation of who should fill the remaining spots in a poll if you only pick the top 4 automatically. That in itself may result In disagreements.
Well should I make another tournament thread, I’ll bear it in mindI don't think the disagreements would be more when given context from previous season performance and current form.
For example Hurkacz has no precedence whatsoever to be included over Kyrgios now.
A good reason:I don't think the disagreements would be more when given context from previous season performance and current form.
For example Hurkacz has no precedence whatsoever to be included over Kyrgios now.
Today. No one has any idea what time.When is the draw out?
A good reason:
![]()
Kyrgios is currently 4th in USO futures at 8-1. But you don't include him in your poll because, reasons? Unless you know he won't play Cincy entirely.
And reasons? You realize that top 8 seeds are not universal for all surfaces, let alone crowds, scheduling, momentum, etc, etc.
It is only advisable to include all top 4 seeds due to how the draws are made but after that one REALLY should look at context less your poll turns out like a riot which in Montreal it certainly did. But whatever.
I literally just saw someone tweet about that lol. Off to digest. Thanks for postingThe draw:
Draws | ATP Tour | Tennis
Official singles, doubles and qualifying draw from the tournament archive in men's professional tennis on the ATP Tour.www.atptour.com
I mean, to be fair, nobody short of Biff and his Sports Almanac could have come up with a solid poll for Montreal. The only names outside of the top 8 that may have reasonably been included were Berrettini and Kyrgios, and they won't be playing in the weekend either.
Kyrgios and Busta should have both been included.
Agree about Kyrgios but Busta... meh! He ran into a good week - certainly not unheard of, but he had given exactly zero signs of being in any sort of top form. Also, had never been past the 2R in this tournament.
Herbie is a former HC 1000 champ and didn’t have the good fortune to have his Wimbledon SF rival withdraw yet shouldn’t be in the poll but NK should because he beat Nishioka in a 250.
Ok, okaaaay.
He last played Canada like 4 years ago. He's made two USO Semis and two Cincy QFs including last year. Still a Top 20 player with big names out. Plus his draw. ???
His draw was BRUTAL, by far the worst in the entire field. Never mind how things turned out, before the start his projected path to the final looked like Mount Everest with no oxygen:
Berrettini-Rune-Sinner-Tsitsipas-Alcaraz
Oddsmakers had him comfortable out in the 1R.
What about QF? That looks tough against Sinner/FAA in best of 3 fast conditions.It's Nadal's for the taking. Alcaraz has lost his aura, and Medvedev...until he can revert to his wild and crazy self will go quietly into the night.
Murray having to play qualies to get in. Ben Shelton I saw play Isner in Atlanta. The kid is the real deal, looking forward to his progress
If Nadal wins he can be no1 before the us open and top seed. That’s added incentive for Rafa to do well next week as well as fund form for us open.
Aren't the court conditions in Cincinnati virtually the same as Flushing Meadows? B5 or B3, if Nadal's playing, he's in it to win it. I'll take my chances on Nadal.What about QF? That looks tough against Sinner/FAA in best of 3 fast conditions.
SD? If you mean SE, no, Murray does not qualify for it. A SE is given only when a player was on the entry list for Qualifying but is still active in the main draw from the ongoing tournament. All 4 Montreal SFists are DE to Cincinnati and 7 of 8 QFists are in. Draper, who had to qualify in Montreal, was not on the entry list,so there will be no SE. When this happens the TD can award a late additional WC to fill the spot.With Busta beating Draper I believe Murray gets SD.
Cincinnati is usually faster.Aren't the court conditions in Cincinnati virtually the same as Flushing Meadows? B5 or B3, if Nadal's playing, he's in it to win it. I'll take my chances on Nadal.
I wonder why as they both use Laykold. Different balls? Atmospheric conditions?Cincinnati is usually faster.
As far as the draw is concerned it doesn't make too much difference being seeded #1 or #2. Number 2 can end up with a more favourable draw than number 1 as is evidenced here in Cincy.If Nadal wins he can be no1 before the us open and top seed. That’s added incentive for Rafa to do well next week as well as fund form for us open.
Nadal likes fast hardcourts, because it gets him free points on serve.Cincinnati is usually faster.
Laykold, just like Plexipave, Decoturf and GreenSet, can be slowed down by adding more sand to the top layer, making it grittier. For an extreme example, look at the last decade or so on Plexipave at Indian Wells. The balls are changed at the same 7/9 games but are ridiculously worn out a couple of games before changing.I wonder why as they both use Laykold. Different balls? Atmospheric conditions?