ATP 250 Buenos Aires Semi-final: Nadal vs Thiem (Who's the King of Clay)

Who wins?


  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .
Exactly. The butt hurt Nadal fans and Rafa detractors need to check their id.10t files. Rafa had one match point which Thiem snuffed out. The level of both players through out the match was extremely high and Rafa's game is getting stronger (best match of the week easily for Rafa.) Thiem should get all the credit including applying enough pressure throughout the match to induce the Rafa choke in the tiebreaker. (And yes butt hurt fans and detractors that was horrible, starting out with Nadal DF and then downhill til 6-1.)

In short, buck up true believers (@MichaelNadal , @JohnnyMac Fan! , @La Grande , @leviAckerman? (nooooo)). This is just the beginning of the clay season and now Bull has a new adversary to stoke the competive fires.

Thiem has dethroned the King of Clay and now reigns. Can't wait for the final!

that was some kind of reverse in the park home run
 
Exactly. The butt hurt Nadal fans and Rafa detractors need to check their id.10t files. Rafa had one match point which Thiem snuffed out. The level of both players through out the match was extremely high and Rafa's game is getting stronger (best match of the week easily for Rafa.) Thiem should get all the credit including applying enough pressure throughout the match to induce the Rafa choke in the tiebreaker. (And yes butt hurt fans and detractors that was horrible, starting out with Nadal DF and then downhill til 6-1.)

In short, buck up true believers (@MichaelNadal , @JohnnyMac Fan! , @La Grande , @leviAckerman? (nooooo)). This is just the beginning of the clay season and now Bull has a new adversary to stoke the competive fires.

Thiem has dethroned the King of Clay and now reigns. Can't wait for the final!


lol. Believe me I would love to have seen Rafa play at an extremely high level. Saying we are criticizing Rafa and calling us butthurt at the same time hardly makes sense.

Thiem played okay and I wish he had played better too so that Rafa's loss could be more excusable.
 
43095053_889e58b078.jpg
Looks more like a goat.
 
Even though Nadal wasn't at his best, this is still a huge confidence win for Thiem. 2016 looks promising, for the Thiem Team.

I think "Nadal's best" is very debatable at this point...but Thiem is good...what really wasn't good for Nadal is Thiem looking gassed at the end, down match point, and still winning....Nadal can't accept that in good demeanor
 
Thiem was not great and looked set to lose midway through the final set... as usual Rafa couldn't capitalize and the match went on for long enough that the opponent finally started zoning on serve. Also had some patented Rafa mental failures (DF, failed drop shots).

the drop shots put him in position to win, but he did choke them away at the end...still, he needs them and more diversity to his game, because he can't out grind or outhit a young stud like this anymore....Thiem was gassed at the end but still won, that's troubling for Nadal...would have been interesting if this was RG and it went to the fourth, or fifth...who was actually fitter?...Nadal didn't seem tired, and Thiem did, but it didn't matter
 
Last edited:
the drop shots put him in position to win, but he did choke them away at the end...still, he needs them and more diversity to his game, because he can't out grind or outhit a young stud like this anymore....thiem was gassed at the end but still won, that's troubling for Nadal...would have been interesting if this was RG and it went to the fourth, or fifth...who was actually fitter?...Nadal didn't seem tired, and Thiem did, but it didn't matter
Current Rafa is better in best of 3 than in best of 5. And it seems that he's now getting worse in best of 3, so...
 
Current Rafa is better in best of 3 than in best of 5. And it seems that he's now getting worse in best of 3, so...

idk here, he seemed pretty much the same physically at the end, and Thiem seemed worse

I think b of 3 is better for him now...on the other hand, with his nerves being what they are, b of 5, especially on clay, still provides him with some leeway for mid-match chokes..like that tb...was Thiem going to get stronger in the fourth?..or was that all he had?
 
No. Thiem is one of the best outside of the well known players on clay. There are several better than him.
List please. Djokovic is above Thiem until Thiem proves otherwise. I wouldn't put Murray, Wawrinka, Ferrer, or Federer above Thiem. Thiem is top 20 and clay is by far his best surface. No other candidates come to mind.
 
Anyone knows the number of clay titles won by Vilas and Nadal?
Clay #
1. Argentina Guillermo Vilas 49
2. Spain Rafael Nadal 47
3. Austria Thomas Muster 40
4. Sweden Björn Borg 30
5. Czechoslovakia/United States Ivan Lendl 28
6. Argentina Jose Luis Clerc 21
7. Sweden Mats Wilander 20
8. Spain Carlos Moyá 16
Ecuador Andres Gomez
10. Spain Jose Higueras 15

Thiem going for 4. Not bad, not bad.
 
I think "Nadal's best" is very debatable at this point...but Thiem is good...what really wasn't good for Nadal is Thiem looking gassed at the end, down match point, and still winning....Nadal can't accept that in good demeanor
By best I mean this is not '2009' FO Nadal, but for a young player on tour this is a huge win because of Nadal's status in the sport.
 
Clay #
1. Argentina Guillermo Vilas 49
2. Spain Rafael Nadal 47
3. Austria Thomas Muster 40
4. Sweden Björn Borg 30
5. Czechoslovakia/United States Ivan Lendl 28
6. Argentina Jose Luis Clerc 21
7. Sweden Mats Wilander 20
8. Spain Carlos Moyá 16
Ecuador Andres Gomez
10. Spain Jose Higueras 15

Thiem going for 4. Not bad, not bad.
Thanks.
Nadal missed a good opportunity here. He better take every minor clay event very seriously if he wants to get to #50.
 
BUENOS AIRES: Defending champion Rafael Nadal suffered another setback Saturday when he squandered a match point before losing 6-4, 4-6, 7-6 (7/4) to Austria's Dominic Thiem in the Argentina Open semi-finals.

Top seed Nadal, playing on his favourite clay surface, finally wilted in the 32-degree heat in Buenos Aires after two hours and 50 minutes on court against Thiem, the world number 19, who goes on to face either David Ferrer or Nicolas Almagro in Sunday's final.

"It was a tough match. I had a chance to win and missed it but Thiem played well," said Nadal, whose claycourt title total remains on 47. "I'm not worried. I just lacked consistency and need to make fewer unforced errors, but that's nothing."

Nadal now heads for Rio next week where he will again be top seed and where he was champion in 2014. He is expecting similarly gruelling conditions in the Olympic host city.

"I struggled a bit to adapt to the extreme conditions here. I felt more tired than usual. I know that in Rio de Janeiro it's not going to be better, so I must continue to adapt."

On Saturday, Nadal, in his first tournament since his shock first round exit at the Australian Open, dropped serve in the ninth game of the opener to allow 22-year-old Thiem to serve out for a one-set lead.

The 29-year-old Spaniard fought off a break point in the seventh game of the second as the big-hitting Thiem, the youngest member of the world top 20, threatened to run away with the contest.

But the 14-time major winner, who won the pair's only other meeting against at Roland Garros in 2014, made the most of his lifeline to break in the 10th game to level the semi-final.

Thiem, who once trained for his matches by carrying tree trunks on his back to beef up his physique, nipped ahead for 2-0 in the decider.

But back came Nadal to level at 2-2 before Thiem saved a match point in the 10th game.

In the tiebreak, however, it was Thiem who proved the stronger, stretching to a 6/1 lead.

Nadal saved three match points but the fifth-seeded Austrian held his nerve to give himself a shot at a fourth career title on Sunday in what will be his fifth final, all of which have been on clay.

- AFP/ec
 
List please. Djokovic is above Thiem until Thiem proves otherwise. I wouldn't put Murray, Wawrinka, Ferrer, or Federer above Thiem. Thiem is top 20 and clay is by far his best surface. No other candidates come to mind.

How is even Murray not better than Thiem or even Ferrer? Thiem has not done anything big on clay until now. I would not count him even in top 5 on clay with list being Djokovic, Nadal, Wawrinka, Kei, Murray for 2016. He may win French this year or in few years but he is not top 5 and is barely top 10 on clay.
 
@marc45 I really have faith in the Fog for this FO. The era is so weak right now, that pretty much anything can happen. This is clay, so that further lowers the chances for Murray. Murray and Fed have no chance. Wawrinka, sure, but he is pretty darn inconsistent, so who knows. Nadal....well looks like he is done. There is Djokovic and the top 5-25 have pretty good chances to make a deep run.
 
Exactly. The butt hurt Nadal fans and Rafa detractors need to check their id.10t files. Rafa had one match point which Thiem snuffed out. The level of both players through out the match was extremely high and Rafa's game is getting stronger (best match of the week easily for Rafa.) Thiem should get all the credit including applying enough pressure throughout the match to induce the Rafa choke in the tiebreaker. (And yes butt hurt fans and detractors that was horrible, starting out with Nadal DF and then downhill til 6-1.)

In short, buck up true believers (@MichaelNadal , @JohnnyMac Fan! , @La Grande , @Levi_Ackerman). This is just the beginning of the clay season and now Bull has a new adversary to stoke the competive fires.

Thiem has dethroned the King of Clay and now reigns. Can't wait for the final!

Me too going to be great. Almagro looks jacked lol.
 
Don't know if it's been posted but Thiem is now the only active player to win a final set tiebreak against Nadal on clay

My grandmother could win a final set tiebreak against Nadal these days. That isn't anything to brag about! The old Nadal left the building a good year and a half ago and it doesn't look like that version will reappear. Beating this Nadal at the FO in 2015 is nothing to brag about either. It's a Nadal who has lost what made him Nadal.
 
@marc45 I really have faith in the Fog for this FO. The era is so weak right now, that pretty much anything can happen. This is clay, so that further lowers the chances for Murray. Murray and Fed have no chance. Wawrinka, sure, but he is pretty darn inconsistent, so who knows. Nadal....well looks like he is done. There is Djokovic and the top 5-25 have pretty good chances to make a deep run.

Are you insane? Fognini has greater chances to win the FO if Djokovic goes out than Murray, Federer or Wawrinka? Please don't be silly. First of all we need to see if Murray's head will be set on straight in time for the FO. He may not care about winning the FO and may still care more about his fatherhood duties. Secondly, we need to see how Federer is and if he is injured or not. IF Murray and Federer decide to be ready to compete for the FO (a slam neither one competes their hardest at especially at this stage in their careers) surely they will be tougher than a journeyman like Fognini. Come on now! As for Nadal, forget about him. This version will likely go out by the QF.
 
Are you insane? Fognini has greater chances to win the FO if Djokovic goes out than Murray, Federer or Wawrinka? Please don't be silly. First of all we need to see if Murray's head will be set on straight in time for the FO. He may not care about winning the FO and may still care more about his fatherhood duties. Secondly, we need to see how Federer is and if he is injured or not. IF Murray and Federer decide to be ready to compete for the FO (a slam neither one competes their hardest at especially at this stage in their careers) surely they will be tougher than a journeyman like Fognini. Come on now! As for Nadal, forget about him. This version will likely go out by the QF.
Thats not the context I was saying it in. Its just a bold prediction that is even remotely possible because of a weak era. My prediction was a Fognini Novak final.
 
Lololollollloloollo.... poor rafito.... not even funny anymore
 
123456789, post: 10046501, member: 743563"]Thats not the context I was saying it in. Its just a bold prediction that is even remotely possible because of a weak era. My prediction was a Fognini Novak final.

But it doesn't make sense if Federer and Murray are fit and ready to play.
 
But it doesn't make sense if Federer and Murray are fit and ready to play.
Federer is getting old now and he can lose to anyone at the FO. Same can be said for Murray on clay.

They have higher chances, I'm not denying that. But I think Fognini will reach the finals, thats why its a bold prediction.
 
Whoever you are referring to 123..., the bandwagoning accusations are getting really old.
 
Back
Top