too much sun last week... that's unacceptableSo what are these major issues?
Sure the positive voice is to be seen but the sites have obligations to viewers/readers to report objective news from there.Professional sites are for PR and it would be hard to expect it would be otherwise.
Controversial officiating - control of the audiences, line call decisions, influencing matches, questionable medical timeouts etc.So what are these major issues?
They have an obligation to the shareholders.Sure the positive voice is to be seen but the sites have obligations to viewers/readers to report objective news from there.
Controversial officiating - control of the audiences, line call decisions, influencing matches, questionable medical timeouts etc.
Organizational inadequacies - injuries on courts/practice courts due to hazardous layout, scheduling without considering weather conditions etc.
Sure the positive voice is to be seen but the sites have obligations to viewers/readers to report objective news from there.
Controversial officiating - control of the audiences, line call decisions, influencing matches, questionable medical timeouts etc.
Organizational inadequacies - injuries on courts/practice courts due to hazardous layout, scheduling without considering weather conditions etc.
too much sun last week... that's unacceptable![]()
my bullometer shows perfectly acceptable values this year...Not enough bovines in the tournament this year, which is also unacceptable.
Let the Yankees whine....There is a lot of negative reporting on 2026 RG but nothing on professional sites. I wish the professional tennis orgs owned up to at least some of their most significant RG shortcomings with some reports.
Feels like a family of many children who are being lied to that their parents are "just fine" while they in fact are either separated or divorced. Now I am not sure whether the sport's org is the wife and investor husband or the other way around.They have an obligation to the shareholders.
"In God We Trust""god it's killing me"
There is a lot of negative reporting on 2026 RG but nothing on professional sites. I wish the professional tennis orgs owned up to at least some of their most significant RG shortcomings with some reports.
What exactly are the shortcomings? Can you tell me what they are, what you think they should be posting about? Also don't link me anything, I want to see you write what the shortcomings are what it is you think people are referencing and talking about. Once again, No links. I want you to tell me.
They are some faults and double-faults of (not players) the organizersWhat exactly are the shortcomings?
Yes, I can tell you like I've said hereCan you tell me what they are, what you think they should be posting about?
Controversial officiating - control of the audiences, line call decisions, influencing matches, questionable medical timeouts etc.
Organizational inadequacies - injuries on courts/practice courts due to hazardous layout, scheduling without considering weather conditions etc.
I don't want to sound snobby here but I'd suggest you follow the tennis tournament closer to find out for yourself what goes on there. Let me just say how Ruud's loss of his R16 tiebreaker setpoint and the second set is worse than unprofessional from the professional officials, and how players such as Blockx or Sonmez have got injured and had to prematurely leave for the organizers'/sponsors' issues. The suggested medical timeout from the umpire to Sinner during an unfinished game has yet been another irregularity in officiating. You could look for links to those problems yourself as there are quite a few across all kinda media but let me help you with some here;Also don't link me anything, I want to see you write what the shortcomings are what it is you think people are referencing and talking about. Once again, No links. I want you to tell me.
They need to give the ATP 50% of profits, but spread out so new talent can emerge.
If WTA wants the money they’re more then welcome to try playing in ATP, otherwise I don’t want to hear about wanting more pay for less work.
You are correct. They don't get anything directly.The ATP/WTA get 0% of profits as they are not the beneficial owners of slams.
Another controversial officiating that has given a qualifier Adolfo Daniel Vallejo 65,000 dollars fine. That's half of his earnings at RG 2026. How have the officials arrived to fine the lowly player such an amount of money?
John McEnroe has said it
"This guy, he doesn't make the type of money. For this guy to walk out, he's obviously stupid, but that is a big-time fine. It's his second language. He's not a natural English speaker. He speaks Spanish. You've got to cut the guy a little slack," McEnroe said during the TNT Sports coverage.
![]()
John McEnroe Draws Naomi Osaka Comparison as He Slams ‘Absurd’ $65K French Open Fine for ATP Pro
When Adolfo Daniel Vallejo made his first-ever appearance at the French Open‘s main draw, he didn’t predict being at the center of a major controversy. However, that is exactly how things transpired for the Paraguayan as he was fined $65,000 for making inappropriate remarks towards the chair...www.yahoo.com
He's the right protagonist to point to the fine for he's had quite a few runs with the officials too.Mac is suggesting that the fine be proportionate to the player's prize earnings/wealth.
![]()
She's one example of a crime but there are a lot more of those. I can recall Nick Kyrgios with his numerous infractions (some serious) and none of them was given such a high honor.Serena Williams was fined $17,000 after she had accused chair umpire Carlos Ramos of sexism and had also called him a “thief”
He's the right protagonist to point to the fine for he's had quite a few runs with the officials too.
She's one example of a crime but there are a lot more of those. I can recall Nick Kyrgios with his numerous infractions (some serious) and none of them was given such a high honor.
I wonder where Amelie Mauresmo stands, or has stood, when those fines are given and when weather forecasters call the weather and when winds blow etc.
It doesn't matter at all if this ball is called in or out. For such small margins a random decision is the best you can expect. 1 mm left or right wouldn't make the shot better or worse (a shot to the outside of the line is a bad shot anyway, nobody would aim there). Not even the lines are that perfect. And the electronic system also has some tolerance...Let me just say how Ruud's loss of his R16 tiebreaker setpoint and the second set is worse than unprofessional from the professional officials,
Did you see the match? Do you know which call/ball you are talking about? This really ain't bout "1 mm left or right".It doesn't matter at all if this ball is called in or out. For such small margins a random decision is the best you can expect. 1 mm left or right wouldn't make the shot better or worse (a shot to the outside of the line is a bad shot anyway, nobody would aim there). Not even the lines are that perfect. And the electronic system also has some tolerance...
The female tournament director may as well be the reason why that oversized fine of 65,000 has been given to the player. We Canadians have recently begun having issues with pronouns in some provinces which seems to be spreading to French Open office of Amerie She Mauresmo.Roland Garros director Amélie Mauresmo called the comments 'unacceptable.'
you mean he was fined not for behavior but for a socio-political incorrect remark? Half his earnings?Just look at the double standard from Mauresmo and slam officials.
Serena directly insults the most respected male chair umpire in the world, Ramos.
Calls him a thief during a match and has the male umpire banned from ever working her US Open matches.
Compare and contrast with Vallejo, who said nothing to the chair umpire during the match.
Merely opined in post-match interviews that a female umpire could not handle the crowd.
And Vallejo is hit with one of the largest fines in RG history for merely voicing his opinions.
After the match, Vallejo raised questions over Carvalho’s officiating and opined that such matches should have a male umpire.
“Matches like this have to be umpired by a man; it’s very difficult for a woman to do it. It has to be umpired by a man.
Because it’s a very demanding crowd and you need a lot of strength to go against it,”
Roland Garros director Amélie Mauresmo called the comments 'unacceptable.'
Just look at the double standard from Mauresmo and slam officials.
Serena directly insults the most respected male chair umpire in the world, Ramos.
Calls him a thief during a match and has the male umpire banned from ever working her US Open matches.
Compare and contrast with Vallejo, who said nothing to the chair umpire during the match.
Merely opined in post-match interviews that a female umpire could not handle the crowd.
And Vallejo is hit with one of the largest fines in RG history for merely voicing his opinions.
After the match, Vallejo raised questions over Carvalho’s officiating and opined that such matches should have a male umpire.
“Matches like this have to be umpired by a man; it’s very difficult for a woman to do it. It has to be umpired by a man.
Because it’s a very demanding crowd and you need a lot of strength to go against it,”
Roland Garros director Amélie Mauresmo called the comments 'unacceptable.'




Sure the positive voice is to be seen but the sites have obligations to viewers/readers to report objective news from there.
Controversial officiating - control of the audiences, line call decisions, influencing matches, questionable medical timeouts etc.
Organizational inadequacies - injuries on courts/practice courts due to hazardous layout, scheduling without considering weather conditions etc.
We are morally compelled to correct the disinformation campaign.
There are only about 30 Gold Badge Umpires in the world and Ramos was considered one of the very best.
The final rounds of majors are exclusively umpired by these select few Gold Badge Umpires.
Prior to the ban, Ramos had umpired 10 singles major finals.
Following the ban, Ramos umpired 0 singles major finals.
We have no Horse In The Race but we take the info straight from the Horse's Mouth:
Following the ban, Ramos never umpired a majors final.
![]()
Still flogging the same horse years after the event.

Would you close the stadium roof before the match, if the weather report of strong winds was called? Would you close the stadium roof after a badly wind affected match when another match was to be played and weather forecast called for more winds? Or, would you wait to see how much the wind affects the next match with the open roof top and close it only after the first set then? Note that I am not saying the French Open org wouldn't close the roof top if FAA lost the first set."Scheduling without considering weather conditions." Anyone in particular they have in mind?
Amelie Mauressmo has the male player's earnings cut 50%, even though he put twice as much effort into his match as any female competitors in Roland Garros have in their half that time matches. Under such a heat, it's a double insult.Half his earnings?
Would you close the stadium roof before the match, if the weather report of strong winds was called? Would you close the stadium roof after a badly wind affected match when another match was to be played and weather forecast called for more winds? Or, would you wait to see how much the wind affects the next match with the open roof top and close it only after the first set then? Note that I am not saying the French Open org wouldn't close the roof top if FAA lost the first set.
Yep - even your avatar melted!!!too much sun last week... that's unacceptable![]()
First of, I didn't really mean to pose any "rhetorical questions" but hypothetical ones to think of those situations which I believe were the RG orgs dealing with. On the other note, I agree that the roof should have remained open not to influence the FAA match that had already been into the second set.Not sure if there are rhetorical questions, but I'll answer. Unless the wind is so strong that the players would need to leave the court, wind should be regarded as something they have to deal with. The roof should remain open.
just an old Perrier advertising campaign...@vive le beau jeu ! is that the residue from FO advertisments?
We are morally compelled to correct the disinformation campaign.
There are only about 30 Gold Badge Umpires in the world and Ramos was considered one of the very best.
The final rounds of majors are exclusively umpired by these select few Gold Badge Umpires.
Prior to the ban, Ramos had umpired 10 singles major finals.
Following the ban, Ramos umpired 0 singles major finals.
We have no Horse In The Race but we take the info straight from the Horse's Mouth:
Following the ban, Ramos never umpired a majors final.
![]()
Aaaaawwww….those were the days… J’adore!
I don't think "those ... days" were as chaotic as these days on RG courts that just happened.Aaaaawwww….those were the days… J’adore!