ATP500 China Open 2025

Who wins?

  • Alex de Minaur

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lorenzo Musetti

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Karen Khachanov

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Andrey Rublev

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Jakub Mensik

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Daniil Medvedev

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    10
  • Poll closed .
Pity if Medvedev was injured, just as it seemed he was gaining some momentum again. Pleased though, to see the 19 year old Tien through - hope he can put up a good match against Jannik.

ADM ruffled some feathers but ultimately, shown the door. Quelle surprise, as they no doubt say in Beijing. Can Tien ruffle more feathers? Well, let's start with putting up a good contest. Hope the kid plays well.
If Tien can improve his serve, he can break into the top 25 sooner rather than later. Heck he’s kinda close bc his baseline game is quite good.
 
If Tien can improve his serve, he can break into the top 25 sooner rather than later. Heck he’s kinda close bc his baseline game is quite good.
And a bit more oomph on his FH as well. But he is still young and not yet fully physically developed imo. But mentally and gamestyle wise he is very promising
 
I'm watching, just taking a break from commentating for a bit. A bit burned out from the summer stretch. Still watching everything though.
I think Sinner plays robotic tennis. For one thing he almost never comes to the net except when forced. He has huge power but is so uncreative. And I can't forget the whole doping thing. It was so unfair to other players who were hit with huge bans. The previous match with Demon was much more entertaining until the last set.
 
I think Sinner plays robotic tennis. For one thing he almost never comes to the net except when forced. He has huge power but is so uncreative. And I can't forget the whole doping thing. It was so unfair to other players who were hit with huge bans. The previous match with Demon was much more entertaining until the last set.
Regarding playing style, that probably everyone says about Sinnner more or less. Question is whether that is working. Still working against everyone not named carlos alcaraz which costed him 2 grand slams and 2 atp masters 1000. He himself admitted
So this style cannot be sustained. Need to change his game while facing alcaraz
 
Well, is Sinner taking a cue from Djokovic? Failed to win USO but stormed through China, winning Beijing and Shanghai back-to-back, raking up 1,500 points and taking home a $2M paycheck, even better than the USO runner up!
 
Can't see Wawrinka getting another wild card. Hasn't had any success on the challengers either. This is probably his final career tour match right here.

Sad to see him like this. Completely out of his depth.
 
Can't see Wawrinka getting another wild card. Hasn't had any success on the challengers either. This is probably his final career tour match right here.

Sad to see him like this. Completely out of his depth.
He was in a Challenger final and had the chance to become the oldest Challenger winner ever. I'd say he had some success there. Obviously not like his heyday, but if he's still having fun - why not keep going?
 
We go into the decider. Lets see if Stan has anything left in the tank for the 3rd.

Some mental errors at the end of the set by Marzipan.
 
He was in a Challenger final and had the chance to become the oldest Challenger winner ever. I'd say he had some success there. Obviously not like his heyday, but if he's still having fun - why not keep going?
He's made 1 Challenger final. He's played 9 challenger tournaments this year. That is a not a successful record, for a tour level player. Unless, you're winning challenger titles, any "success" at that level is not worth mentioning.

He's also 2-10 this year on the main tour.

but sure... hE iS hAvInG fUn
 
He's made 1 Challenger final. He's played 9 challenger tournaments this year. That is a not a successful record, for a tour level player. Unless, you're winning challenger titles, any "success" at that level is not worth mentioning.

He's also 2-10 this year on the main tour.

but sure... hE iS hAvInG fUn
He's 40 after all. Nobody else has won a challenger at his age, let alone an ATP Tour title. I think with him playing to this age and given his injury troubles, he defines success differently from you.

I assume he is having fun and is playing because he loves tennis - otherwise he would have quit by now. I say good for him.
 
Regarding playing style, that probably everyone says about Sinnner more or less. Question is whether that is working. Still working against everyone not named carlos alcaraz which costed him 2 grand slams and 2 atp masters 1000. He himself admitted
So this style cannot be sustained. Need to change his game while facing alcaraz
I said this in the other thread, but I think all the talk about him needing a change (including from Sinner himself) is a bit much.

He was one point away from winning 3 of the 4 slams and 2 out of 3 finals against Alcaraz. And if he takes one of those chances, what are we saying right now?
 
I said this in the other thread, but I think all the talk about him needing a change (including from Sinner himself) is a bit much.

He was one point away from winning 3 of the 4 slams and 2 out of 3 finals against Alcaraz. And if he takes one of those chances, what are we saying right now?

Don't you think the best judge of what Sinner needs to do might actually be Sinner himself?
 
I said this in the other thread, but I think all the talk about him needing a change (including from Sinner himself) is a bit much.

He was one point away from winning 3 of the 4 slams and 2 out of 3 finals against Alcaraz. And if he takes one of those chances, what are we saying right now?
If he had won the French, but that didn't happen. What happened that he defeated alcaraz in Wimbledon, definitely became much more agressive since French.
However it was definitely more shocking that alacaraz beat him convincingly on sinners favorite surface. All tennis experts were shocked . It was not a close match.
And you said it was 'too much' that Sinner felt the same. It's correct. Let me post two sample news articles.
 
Don't you think the best judge of what Sinner needs to do might actually be Sinner himself?
Of course. But he doesn't necessarily know what goes on on the other end of the court.

I don't know how much Sinner, and/or his team, was aware of just how bothered Alcaraz was at Wimbledon.

Seems like Sinner's biggest problem is in his head, so info like that is important.

If he had won the French, but that didn't happen. What happened that he defeated alcaraz in Wimbledon, definitely became much more agressive since French.
However it was definitely more shocking that alacaraz beat him convincingly on sinners favorite surface. All tennis experts were shocked . It was not a close match.
And you said it was 'too much' that Sinner felt the same. It's correct. Let me post two sample news articles.
It's not like Alcaraz dominated Sinner in the French. Sinner had three match points for a straight set, dominant win on clay. Then he could have served for it.

That's a big deal. That drastically changes the narrative. I'm just saying that people are making big statements when a single point could have drastically altered the situation.
 
If he had won the French, but that didn't happen. What happened that he defeated alcaraz in Wimbledon, definitely became much more agressive since French.
However it was definitely more shocking that alacaraz beat him convincingly on sinners favorite surface. All tennis experts were shocked . It was not a close match.
And you said it was 'too much' that Sinner felt the same. It's correct. Let me post two sample news articles.
Ashe court is slow and high bouncing, Wimbledon grass has more speed and low bouncing. Ashe court is a disgrace to the northamerican fast courts, anybody whit honesty can tell u that court is slow, in the final they closed the roof and i never seen a slower indoor hardcourt than that
 
Of course. But he doesn't necessarily know what goes on on the other end of the court.

I don't know how much Sinner, and/or his team, was aware of just how bothered Alcaraz was at Wimbledon.

Seems like Sinner's biggest problem is in his head, so info like that is important.


It's not like Alcaraz dominated Sinner in the French. Sinner had three match points for a straight set, dominant win on clay. Then he could have served for it.

That's a big deal. That drastically changes the narrative. I'm just saying that people are making big statements when a single point could have drastically altered the situation.
also Ashe court is slow as F to be called a northamerican fast court.
Anyway i didnt see a great Sinner in the entire tournement, i think the virus he caught in Cincy was a factor because after that the energy and hes pressure fast pace was not there like in the months before
 
Back
Top