People keep saying this is Murray in Wimbledon 2013 form.
Disagree, I think it looks like Murray in 2012 Olympics.
He is CRUSHING the ball.
Yes, you're right.. Murray's playing better than Wimbledon 13.
People keep saying this is Murray in Wimbledon 2013 form.
Disagree, I think it looks like Murray in 2012 Olympics.
He is CRUSHING the ball.
:lol: Careful, don't jinx Murray!
You never know how these matches will go but it is hard to see how anybody could think Murray won't win a set at least.
Why on earth would he do that?![]()
I honestly think this Murray would have defeated this Federer.
I too think Roger would have lost had he played this Murray.
I think what Hitman meant is the 6-0, 6-1 at WTF and Murray's subsequent comments that it inspired him to make a stronger comeback or something like hat
Mainad;9047405]Perish the thought! :wink:
Exactly. The way Murray is playing at the moment and the way Djokovic just played against Wawrinka, I would think it virtually impossible for him not to. If he doesn't, then I feel it will be more down to his level of play rather than to a goating Djokovic which we have yet to see.
I just don't get how anybody could seriously say Murray won't be capable of winning a set given their history and the many wins Murray has had over Djokovic in both Slam and Masters finals! I mean, it beggars belief and just underlies the absolute lack of respect for him and his game that certain posters on here persist in trotting out despite all evidence to the contrary![/
I too think Roger would have lost had he played this Murray.
I think what Hitman meant is the 6-0, 6-1 at WTF and Murray's subsequent comments that it inspired him to make a stronger comeback or something like hat
No male player went 0-4 in AO finals.
Harry Hopman, Neale Fraser and Andy Murray share the 0-3 record.
Going with Murray in 5.
Well in the last three slams finals now that Novak has been in, he has played against Nadal, Federer and Murray. He is playing every one of the big four in a slam final within the last 12 months.
Wait, I thought you have been telling us for weeks that Djokovic will win this title because that is what the astrological charts tell you? Why are you changing your tune now and why do you always do that?
Does the astrology tell you Djokovic will win this or not? :-?
ah, why didn't you tell us earlier though?The problem for Nole is during his debut match his moon was combust which is bad omen for the final.
ah, why didn't you tell us earlier though?
Well in the last three slams finals now that Novak has been in, he has played against Nadal, Federer and Murray. He is playing every one of the big four in a slam final within the last 12 months.
He had the chance to play a clown like Cilic in the USO final but he blew it...
The problem for Nole is during his debut match his moon was combust which is bad omen for the final.
I would never bet on Murray in an AO final. His record in finals there is dismal. Soon could be 0-4. He lost in odd years to Nole in the final.
2011
2013
2015?
Wait, you will have to help me understand. You were telling us for weeks that Novak was going to win the 2015. NOW you are saying that is not the case and Murray will win because Novak's moon was combust during his debut match. YET, you said this the other day which was AFTER Novak's debut match:
So you are all over the map and you can see how somebody may not think your predictions are reliable right? You can't keep flip flopping. You have to read the astrology charts, make a prediction and stick with it. It is easy to say the astrological forecast changes once you know who the finalists are and you see how a player looks in the SF. That doesn't seem fair. Why can't you look at the astrology and predict the winners and stick with it?
Isn't it obvious? He's saying neither Djokovic nor Murray will win. Better get your bets on Federer and Nadal.
You have to be blind to think Murray has a chance. Djokovic is 5% better in every tennis aspect compared to Murray. Whatever Murray does, Djokovic does it slightly better.
Murray can win a set or 2 against him but no chance in hell he wins the final.
Wait, you will have to help me understand. You were telling us for weeks that Novak was going to win the 2015. NOW you are saying that is not the case and Murray will win because Novak's moon was combust during his debut match.
You have to be blind to think Murray has a chance. Djokovic is 5% better in every tennis aspect compared to Murray. Whatever Murray does, Djokovic does it slightly better.
Murray can win a set or 2 against him but no chance in hell he wins the final.
I hope Djokovic to win, at the same time I hate seeing Murray losing another slams final(so do for Djoko)
![]()
I hope: Nole
But I feel that Murray is gonna win this
Hey SNowwhite, long time no see..Well, you might not even remember me. :lol:
Plus he wants to shut people up about the criticism for his coaching choice in Mauresmo. He looks like he is playing more aggressively and looks like his fitness is good. I think Murray may take this one.
Yes--that would be another message sent--for all of the TW members believing no woman can coach a man (but in typically hypocritical fashion, never complain about males--ex-players or not--coaching women), Murray winning would throw that back in their faces.