With a good chance now that the roof closes, I'm picking Djok in 4 very tight sets, 2TBs.
How many slam finals has this guy lost now?
Woo Hoo!!! How's that coaching change working out for you Murray? LOL
Will the shorts come off too?
Woo Hoo!!! How's that coaching change working out for you Murray? LOL
Won 2. Lost 6.
2008 US Open F: Roger Federer def. Andy Murray (6-2, 7-5, 6-2)
2010 Australian Open F: Roger Federer def. Andy Murray (6-3, 6-4, 7-6)
2011 Australian Open F: Novak Djokovic def. Andy Murray (6-4, 6-2, 6-3)
2012 Wimbledon F: Roger Federer def. Andy Murray (4-6, 7-5, 6-3, 6-4)
2012 US Open F: Andy Murray def. Novak Djokovic (7-6, 7-5, 2-6, 3-6, 6-2)
2013 Australian Open F: Novak Djokovic def. Andy Murray (6-7, 7-6, 6-3, 6-2)
2013 Wimbledon F: Andy Murray def. Novak Djokovic (6-4, 7-5, 6-4)
2015 Australian Open F: Novak Djokovic def. Andy Murray (7-6, 6-7, 6-3, 6-0)
Murray had his chances in that 3rd set got himself to blame
Murray with a cold handshake.
2 things concern me about Murray:
I get the feeling there is a very thin line between him being brilliant and falling apart completely
This man bageled two of the top 10 to win the Aussie open lol. Goat candidate for sure. Could be another tennis god/religious experience type situation
Is he really being defeated on athletic ability though? I don't see that.
I dont' like Novak, he wins too much. he should have given this one to Murray, he only has 2
Agree.Novak 5 titles at AO, unbelievable in this era!
He's had to do it the hard way beating the likes of Federer, Nadal, Murray and on fire Wawrinka.
No one defends like him on a slow hard court, nobody!
I sure hope this wasn't Murray's Roddick-2009 Wimbledon moment..Well done to Murray for making the final.
No love for FreeBird.
Unbelievable.
I repeat it again:
You need to bow down to this TT oracle.
I called it out before the match,
I charge $1000 for revealing the winning lottery ticket numbers btw. 8)
I really believe so. Murray was able to keep up his intensity of movement and lateral recovery for about 2.5 hours but he couldn't sustain it. It became clear half way through set 3 that even when Murray was hitting more accurate shots he was having to work too hard to recover to neutral enough positions while Djokovic was in the groove effortlessly reaching almost every ball. Interestingly, Djokovic's movement in set 1 was questionable but by set 2 onwards it was outstanding and he can sustain it for 4/5/6 hours.
Murray can only equal Djokovic in terms of not giving up ground on the baseline for about 3 hours.
I can taste the disappointment from Andrew Castle :lol:
I really believe so. Murray was able to keep up his intensity of movement and lateral recovery for about 2.5 hours but he couldn't sustain it. It became clear half way through set 3 that even when Murray was hitting more accurate shots he was having to work too hard to recover to neutral enough positions while Djokovic was in the groove effortlessly reaching almost every ball. Interestingly, Djokovic's movement in set 1 was questionable but by set 2 onwards it was outstanding and he can sustain it for 4/5/6 hours.
Murray can only equal Djokovic in terms of not giving up ground on the baseline for about 3 hours.
Djoker is a more fluid mover...it also helps that he isn't lugging around tree trunk legs corner to corner like murray.
When Murray went 2-0 up at the beginning of the 3rd, who could have known he'd only win 1 more game all match.
who the **** gets baggled in a deciding set for grandslam such a joke
Djokovic is lucky he even got a handshake after all the theatrics.
He's the complete opposite of Federer on court-so I don't get how a Federer fan is so passionate about Djokovic!
All right he's not the most complete player ever, but let's be honest - Djokovic is The Omnipotence of the tour.
Still, I agree it's better to take the huge devastating forehands and more imbalanced games of Nadal or Federer over Djokovic.
Djokovic might be able to challenge this notion though over the next few years.
Pretend to be injured?