Murray wins in straights convincingly and Blinkism says he's playing bad. Nadal drops a set and looks crap the entire match, and Blink says what a great fighter he is. Yep.
I swear, Murray could triple bagel someone and Blink would still find a way to criticize him. Oh wait, that damn near almost happened Round 1! :lol:
Blink - Del Potro just got bageled in his match. Why don't you talk about how he's not doing what he needs to do to win? You come out and are critical of Murray every game of every match, yet JMDP gets bageled and looks crap his entire match, and you say nothing. Nadal looked crap his entire match, and you just say how great it is that he pulled out the win somehow. Murray wins in straights, and all you can talk about is how bad he looks and that he should be winning easier, though when he actually did win easily in R1, you still found a way to criticize him. I know I am not the only one that sees this.
. But I will say Murray's opponents are of nothing to brag about, they don't have any weapons to hurt him on top they barely play aggressive against Murray which is key. He plays Isner in the 4th round, I think that is also going to be as stroll in the park for Murray. Isner doesn't really have any ground weapons so he's most likely relying on the match going to TB's. Nadal playing Karlovic which you could say is almost exactly the same as Isner. But now nadal had finally got a challenge with phillip. This isn't saying that either looked good or bad I'm saying we should just wait until they meet in the QF.
