I got the exact same feeling, when you look at the draws like 10 or 15 years back there were so many names who could make a dent. Someone who can really take it to the top guys playing well (like Wawrinka did to Djokovic in 2013 f.e.) Right now I feel you have to prop up the chances/cases for pretty much everyone to make things look more interesting than they are. In reality, If Sinner and Alcaraz play at least at their B- level they're not losing to anyone before the final, not even close. I will be surprised if they lose a set in any match before the final, that's how little faith I have in the field.
Some like to compare Sinner/Alcaraz to Djokovic/Nadal back in the day, saying Sinner/Alcaraz are that good. Dude, if you compare their fields to 2011/2012 f.e. when Nadal and Djokovic made 4 Slam finals in a row they still had to beat a bunch of good/great players before they met each other:
2011 Wimbledon - Djokovic already had someone like Anderson in the 2nd round, Baghdatis in the 3rd round and also beat Tsonga (who took out Fed) before facing Nadal. Nadal had to beat Del Potro, Fish and Murray to get to Djokovic. Even Muller in the 3rd round wasn't an easy for him (Muller actually beat Nadal twice at Wimbledon in 2005 and in 2017).
2011 US Open - Djokovic had Davydenko in the 3rd round, a zoning Dolgopolov in the 4th round, Tipsarevic pushed him hard for 2 sets and then obviously beating a really good Fed in the SF. Nadal had sneaky Nalbandian in the 3rd round, Roddick in the QF and Murray in the SF.
2012 AO - man, the SF opponents for them alone should close this case. Murray at his highest level and Fed played really well in the SF too. Djokovic also beat Hewitt, Ferrer while Nadal had to beat a zoning Berdych in the QF who was one volley away from going 2-0 up in sets.
2012 FO - Djokovic came from 0-2 against Seppi, then had a super tough QF against Tsonga where he saved match points, then beat Fed. Nadal beat Almagro and Ferrer, but he wasn't losing to anyone at the FO anyway.
And what now? The draw is 10x tougher for Sinner because he has teenage Fonseca in the 3rd round? REALLY? Both Alcaraz and Sinner have freaking easy peasy matches, this era is so weak it's not even funny, if they don't reach the final it's 100% their fault. They don't have draws filled with players like an older Fed, Murray, Del Potro, Tsonga. Even someone like a well playing Nalbandian is hard to find in their draws. There are barely hardly any floaters even like a Baghdatis at Wimbledon in the 3rd round. Again, if they don't reach the final it's 100% on them. They have no reason to lose to anyone in this field other than themselves. Djokovic is nearly 40, Zverev hasn't beaten anyone of worth in a significant match since 2024 (Djokovic retiring at the AO doesn't count). The tour is so weak that I've seen some people prop up guys like VACHEROT who played one good tournament in his life. Fonseca is still riding on his potential-hype, he hasn't really shown anything that he's ready to really push the top 2 guys at this point and maybe needs another year or two before he does anything of worth.
The odds reflect the tour, there's a 95% chance that either Sinner or Alcaraz wins the AO for a reason. They are good obviously but the strength of the tour of guys ranked 3rd and below is a total farce. Weakest collective level in history.
