Hood_Man
G.O.A.T.
Bruh.Unironically:
Sinner in 5.
Bruh.Unironically:
Sinner in 5.
The commentator very likely was fed that tidbit into their earpiece by a research person behind the scenes. You then fed it to TTW. So you get credit here. You didn’t certify it anyway so I took it with a grain of salt, as I do all uncertified posts.No, it's not me who came up with that. It was the ESPN en Español commentator.
Thanks for that clip - it must be so painful to have to decipher his feelings etc to them / comparisons to previous losses etc. He showed his lions heart on the court today, and again in the presser Kudos to him indeed.One area where Daniil Medvedev will seldom be defeated is the post-match press conference. This must be an incredibly tough pill to swallow, and I genuinely feel for him. Yet he showed up in the media room and was his usual chatty self: pleasant, frank, insightful and engaging.
A joy to listen to, kudos to this champion!............
Yes, it is. I hope that he will gain due respect for the fight he showed all tournament, and in the final. He gave it his all, and no one can do more.Happy for Sinner, but gutted for Medvedev. He was the better player and his body let him down. 5th slam loss, where he had chances to win, is brutal.
He saw Sinner crush Djokovic without Djokovic even having a break point. Medvedev isn't shocked at losing the final. He had alot of mileage on his legs this tournament.One area where Daniil Medvedev will seldom be defeated is the post-match press conference. This must be an incredibly tough pill to swallow, and I genuinely feel for him. Yet he showed up in the media room and was his usual chatty self: pleasant, frank, insightful and engaging.
A joy to listen to, kudos to this champion!
Gotta hand it to Med, he handled a very tough loss with grace and wit. That's about the classiest interview after a slam final loss ever. I also thought the aggressive way Med played the first two sets was the most fun tennis he's ever played. If he can bring that level again and permanently ditches his ROS position, he'll win more slams.Thanks for that clip - it must be so painful to have to decipher his feelings etc to them / comparisons to previous losses etc. He showed his lions heart on the court today, and again in the presser Kudos to him indeed.
Yes, it is. I hope that he will gain due respect for the fight he showed all tournament, and in the final. He gave it his all, and no one can do more.
Sinner game is so much like Djokovic's. If he has the same level of mental strength, who knows what he'll achieve in the majors. I think Wimbledon and USO could be fun. Looking forward to RG too.This was the best GS in many, many years.
He certainly handled the defeat with enormous grace, but why oh why the change of tactics away from what had been working?Gotta hand it to Med, he handled a very tough loss with grace and wit. That's about the classiest interview after a slam final loss ever. I also thought the aggressive way Med played the first two sets was the most fun tennis he's ever played. If he can bring that level again and permanently ditches his ROS position, he'll win more slams.
Gash cantstandyakyrgios.... Always revolves around him.Sinners don't yodel (featuring Nick K.)
I hope he continues to be an attacking player like in the first two sets. 2024 will sure be fun now.Thanks for that clip - it must be so painful to have to decipher his feelings etc to them / comparisons to previous losses etc. He showed his lions heart on the court today, and again in the presser Kudos to him indeed.
Yes, it is. I hope that he will gain due respect for the fight he showed all tournament, and in the final. He gave it his all, and no one can do more.
Going the Murray goat way, I hope he can win one more. Already 27.Congratulations Sinner, deserved winner in the end.
Med now 1-5 in major finals, can't help but feel a little sorry for him.
Yes, I want Meddy to be in the mix, big-time.I hope he continues to be an attacking player like in the first two sets. 2024 will sure be fun now.
Medvedev has now played 5 of the last 7 slam finals on hard courts. He clearly puts himself in positions to wins these titles. His chance will come, but he can’t either lose in straight sets or lose after being up in a match.Yes, I want Meddy to be in the mix, big-time.
Nice photo. I think Carrot-top could make the FO semis, taking out some tiresome dirtballers along the way.Can Sinner also win the French open ??
How far will carrot top go at Wimbledon?Nice photo. I think Carrot-top could make the FO semis, taking out some tiresome dirtballers along the way.
Sinner in the past just didn't perform well there. His margin for error is smaller than guys like RAFA. and his legs get tiredNice photo. I think Carrot-top could make the FO semis, taking out some tiresome dirtballers along the way.
Probably cause those tactics stopped working.He certainly handled the defeat with enormous grace, but why oh why the change of tactics away from what had been working?
Ahh, I see what you did there. Well played!Sinner in the past just didn't perform well there. His margin for error is smaller than guys like RAFA. and his legs get tired
Dunno.How far will carrot top go at Wimbledon?
The tactic I'm talking mainly about is aggression when returning on the 2nd serve. From the outset Medvedev was playing near the lines, mainly wide to Sinner's forehand on second serve returns. He broke 3 times in the first set and a half doing it. We come to 4-4 Deuce on Sinner's serve in the 4th set. Medvedev's on fumes. Sinner's on a second serve. He hits a very neutral second serve to the centre of the box, which Medvedev pushes back defensively. Sinner then assumes control of the point and wins it.Probably cause those tactics stopped working.
Agree.. I thought the same at the time.The tactic I'm talking mainly about is aggression when returning on the 2nd serve. From the outset Medvedev was playing near the lines, mainly wide to Sinner's forehand on second serve returns. He broke 3 times in the first set and a half doing it. We come to 4-4 Deuce on Sinner's serve in the 4th set. Medvedev's on fumes. Sinner's on a second serve. He hits a very neutral second serve to the centre of the box, which Medvedev pushes back defensively. Sinner then assumes control of the point and wins it.
What at that point did Medvedev believe his path to victory was? Based on the tactic adopted on that point (and many others) his only path to victory was Sinner giving him the match. If he rips a return, maybe he makes it, maybe he misses, but he gives himself a chance. By the 4th set Medvedev was actually running around his forehand to hit defensive backhands. On what planet is that a winning strategy when fatigue is your biggest problem? Medvedev is described as one of the smartest players on tour, but his play in the 3rd and 4th sets when he still had a chance was anything but.
YikesMed won’t lose from being up 2 sets to 0 again, right? Right?
I didn't know Med was considered a smart player. That garbage against Djokovic at USO last year made me think intelligence is hardly one of his strengthsThe tactic I'm talking mainly about is aggression when returning on the 2nd serve. From the outset Medvedev was playing near the lines, mainly wide to Sinner's forehand on second serve returns. He broke 3 times in the first set and a half doing it. We come to 4-4 Deuce on Sinner's serve in the 4th set. Medvedev's on fumes. Sinner's on a second serve. He hits a very neutral second serve to the centre of the box, which Medvedev pushes back defensively. Sinner then assumes control of the point and wins it.
What at that point did Medvedev believe his path to victory was? Based on the tactic adopted on that point (and many others) his only path to victory was Sinner giving him the match. If he rips a return, maybe he makes it, maybe he misses, but he gives himself a chance. By the 4th set Medvedev was actually running around his forehand to hit defensive backhands. On what planet is that a winning strategy when fatigue is your biggest problem? Medvedev is described as one of the smartest players on tour, but his play in the 3rd and 4th sets when he still had a chance was anything but.
Watched the highlights again. Still in awe of some of these brutes.That line forehand from Jannik today is for the history books.
Both the semi-finals and finals, Sinner won because of the other guy not playing well/running out of steam, so this win is kind of like an asterisk.Can Sinner also win the French open ??
He didn't change his game radically in 3rd set but just on a few occasions played slighty safer but that is actually human nature.Agree.. I thought the same at the time.
The commentators also pointed out that Med was playing more safe from Set 3 onwards which is always risky against a player like Sinner. I think Med had his chances in the 3rd and 4th set. He just wasn't brave enough with them and was counting on Sinner giving it to him with errors.
Fair enough on the service return tactics. I agree that Medvedev was noticeably less aggressive on second serve returns later in the match.The tactic I'm talking mainly about is aggression when returning on the 2nd serve. From the outset Medvedev was playing near the lines, mainly wide to Sinner's forehand on second serve returns. He broke 3 times in the first set and a half doing it. We come to 4-4 Deuce on Sinner's serve in the 4th set. Medvedev's on fumes. Sinner's on a second serve. He hits a very neutral second serve to the centre of the box, which Medvedev pushes back defensively. Sinner then assumes control of the point and wins it.
What at that point did Medvedev believe his path to victory was? Based on the tactic adopted on that point (and many others) his only path to victory was Sinner giving him the match. If he rips a return, maybe he makes it, maybe he misses, but he gives himself a chance. By the 4th set Medvedev was actually running around his forehand to hit defensive backhands. On what planet is that a winning strategy when fatigue is your biggest problem? Medvedev is described as one of the smartest players on tour, but his play in the 3rd and 4th sets when he still had a chance was anything but.
Agree with what you say..He didn't change his game radically in 3rd set but just on a few occasions played slighty safer but that is actually human nature.
Anyone who has ever played any kind of sport will tell you they have done similar one time or another. Even the big 3 did it on few occasions and particularly when playing one another. It is human nature when victory is within grasp to tighten up slightly and play slightly more passively as you are so close.
The big 3 and other greats do it less than others but as i said every sportsperson has done this at one time or another.
Also towards end of 2nd set his aggressive tactics were starting to be countered a bit more by Jannik and not as 100% effective as first set and a half
Ronnie tends to play more percentage snooker when things start to go against him but he keeps attacking when ahead.He didn't change his game radically in 3rd set but just on a few occasions played slighty safer but that is actually human nature.
Anyone who has ever played any kind of sport will tell you they have done similar one time or another. Even the big 3 did it on few occasions and particularly when playing one another. It is human nature when victory is within grasp to tighten up slightly and play slightly more passively as you are so close.
The big 3 and other greats do it less than others but as i said every sportsperson has done this at one time or another.
Also towards end of 2nd set his aggressive tactics were starting to be countered a bit more by Jannik and not as 100% effective as first set and a half
He didn't change his game radically in 3rd set but just on a few occasions played slighty safer but that is actually human nature.Agree.. I thought the same at the time.
The commentators also pointed out that Med was playing more safe from Set 3 onwards which is always risky against a player like Sinner. I think Med had his chances in the 3rd and 4th set. He just wasn't brave enough with them and was counting on Sinner giving it to him with errors.
Yeah there is always an exception to the rule lol However in general i do think most players with exception of all time greats do tend to automatically play it that little bit safer when on verge of victory.Ronnie tends to play more percentage snooker when things start to go against him but he keeps attacking when ahead.
maybe i need to tell you about Federer stupid slam loses were his tactic was as stupid as can be ?I didn't know Med was considered a smart player. That garbage against Djokovic at USO last year made me think intelligence is hardly one of his strengths
He always seemed a bit more mature than his age, even a few years ago. I think he could be a good coach after he retires as well.One area where Daniil Medvedev will seldom be defeated is the post-match press conference. This must be an incredibly tough pill to swallow, and I genuinely feel for him. Yet he showed up in the media room and was his usual chatty self: pleasant, frank, insightful and engaging.
A joy to listen to, kudos to this champion!
Who are the ten active guys? Djokovic, Nadal, Meddy, Sinner, Alcaraz after those guys im a little lost. Cilic, Stan, Murray, Thiem and who? Del Po? He's the only slam winner i can think of who could still possibly be active.Congratulations to Sinner on winning his maiden Grand Slam singles title and commiserations to Medvedev on narrowly missing out winning his 2nd for the 3rd time running.
In winning the 2024 Australian Open, Sinner becomes:
1. The 1st Italian player to win the Australian Open singles title.
2. The 1st maiden male winner of the Australian Open since Wawrinka (exactly 10 years ago).
3. The 2nd Italian man to win a Grand Slam singles title in the Open Era (after Panatta).
4. The 3rd Italian man in history to win a Grand Slam singles title (after Pietrangeli and Panatta).
5. One of 5 Italian players ever to win a Grand Slam singles title (along with Pietrangeli, Panatta, Schiavone and Pennetta).
6. The youngest man to win the Australian Open since Djokovic (2008).
7. The 2nd male player born this century to win a Grand Slam singles title (after Alcaraz).
8. One of 10 officially active male players to win at least 1 Grand Slam singles title.
9. The 58th male player in the Open Era to win at least 1 Grand Slam singles title.
10. The 153rd male player in history to win at least 1 Grand Slam singles title.
Delpo is not active. So I am not sure who the 10th guy isWho are the ten active guys? Djokovic, Nadal, Meddy, Sinner, Alcaraz after those guys im a little lost. Cilic, Stan, Murray, Thiem and who? Del Po? He's the only slam winner i can think of who could still possibly be active.
Who are the ten active guys? Djokovic, Nadal, Meddy, Sinner, Alcaraz after those guys im a little lost. Cilic, Stan, Murray, Thiem and who? Del Po? He's the only slam winner i can think of who could still possibly be active.
Top 9 active players in slam areThe 10 OFFICIALLY active Slam champions (ie. those who have not yet formally retired) are:
Djokovic, Nadal, Murray, Wawrinka, Alcaraz, Del Potro, Cilic, Thiem, Medvedev and Sinner.