Australian Open Top 10 Ranking

[Neptune]

Open Era until 2023, ranking is solely based on career ATP points, and only calculate R128-F matches. (I may miss out someone close to the bottom of top 10, if you point out I will check and update)

1​	Novak Djokovic​	21,505​
2​	Roger Federer​	19,770​
3​	Rafael Nadal​	12,365​
4​	Stefan Edberg​	10,750​
5​	Andre Agassi​	10,160​
6​	Ivan Lendl​	9,380​
6​	Mats Wilander​	8,380​
8​	Andy Murray​	7,785​
9​	Pete Sampras​	7,640​
10​	John Newcombe​	7,180​

 

[Neptune]

more details for those who interested

​

​

AO​

W​

F​

SF​

QF​

R16​

R32​

R64​

R128​

Entry​

Average​

1​

Novak Djokovic​

21,505​

10​

​

​

3​

2​

​

1​

2​

18​

1,195​

2​

Roger Federer​

19,770​

6​

1​

8​

​

3​

3​

​

​

21​

941​

3​

Rafael Nadal​

12,365​

2​

4​

1​

7​

1​

1​

1​

1​

18​

687​

4​

Stefan Edberg​

10,750​

2​

3​

3​

2​

1​

​

2​

​

13​

827​

5​

Andre Agassi​

10,160​

4​

​

2​

1​

2​

​

​

​

9​

1,129​

6​

Ivan Lendl​

9,380​

2​

2​

3​

1​

2​

1​

​

1​

12​

782​

6​

Mats Wilander​

8,380​

3​

1​

1​

​

2​

​

2​

1​

10​

838​

8​

Andy Murray​

7,785​

​

5​

1​

1​

3​

1​

1​

3​

15​

519​

9​

Pete Sampras​

7,640​

2​

1​

2​

1​

3​

1​

​

1​

11​

695​

10​

John Newcombe​

7,180​

2​

1​

​

5​

1​

​

​

​

9​

798​

 

[Deleted member 629564]

[content deleted by user]

 

[BeatlesFan]

Checks out for sure. Edberg won two AO's but is ahead of Andre who won four.

It's also idiotic to award bonus points for losing second round, or even finals. Winning it is all that matters legacy-wise.

 

[Unseeded Player]

You forgot to apply Mug Era adjustments.
Roger is the AO GOAT.

With only 1 win against Novak and it was made in 2007 and even Nadal owns him there in H2H 3-1...

 

[Third Serve]

You forgot to apply Mug Era adjustments.
Roger is the AO GOAT.

You have one joke

 

[Third Serve]

I would put Agassi over Nadal and almost level with Fed.

 

[Deleted member 629564]

[content deleted by user]

 

[Moose Malloy]

How bout Becker?

 

[Cortana]

Poor Murray.

 

[Neptune]

How bout Becker?

Becker 5,245
No extra F/SF hurts

 

[MichaelNadal]

Nadal definitely needed that second AO. Balance to the universe

 

[Neptune]

Checks out for sure. Edberg won two AO's but is ahead of Andre who won four.

It's also idiotic to award bonus points for losing second round, or even finals. Winning it is all that matters legacy-wise.

You miss it, points are award exactly the ATP way, no bonus for losing, only for winning. No bonus for losing 2nd round, it is for winning first round.

 

[Neptune]

I would put Agassi over Nadal and almost level with Fed.

Agassi has 4 titles in 9 entries, very impressive

 

[TimHenmanATG]

More proof - as if proof were needed - that Mats Wilander is the most underrated ATG.

 

[DSH]

Poor Murray.

Who?

 

[Pheasant]

AO ranking points. Very nice.

 

[timnz]

Open Era until 2023, ranking is solely based on career ATP points, and only calculate R128-F matches. (I may miss out someone close to the bottom of top 10, if you point out I will check and update)

1​	Novak Djokovic​	21,505​
2​	Roger Federer​	19,770​
3​	Rafael Nadal​	12,365​
4​	Stefan Edberg​	10,750​
5​	Andre Agassi​	10,160​
6​	Ivan Lendl​	9,380​
6​	Mats Wilander​	8,380​
8​	Andy Murray​	7,785​
9​	Pete Sampras​	7,640​
10​	John Newcombe​	7,180​

Very interesting. Stands up well. Given the ATPhas changed the ranking points recently (from 1200 to 1300 for runner up, from 720 to 800 for semi-finals)- how does that stand up as Federer made a lot of semi’s