I tried and then returned the Qlipp last week and am now using the Pop. The Qlipp altered the racquet balance and feel more than I expected, but its app and data content is FAR superior to the Pop.
Many of my thoughts have been echoed elsewhere throughout this thread and I am a little surprised that many of them have not been actioned already. They do not appear to be that difficult or unreasonable on first glance.
1. Shot recognition accuracy: difficult to assess, but I am happy to take it at face value. This I am sure will become more accurate with algorithm developments anyway.
2. Connection: tried to connect last night, no joy after having a seemless set up earlier in the day. An hour or so later it did connect and upload the data (4 sets as 4 distinct sessions) although I do not understand why it didn't work initially.
3. Wristband: I use an extended length sweatband and it would be helpful if I could place the Pop in something similar. (other brands offer something which I might try) Having half a dozen of them at an affordable price would be helpful. The wristband itself gets drenched and I find that more fluid will drop to my hand. This is even with my original sweatband up my forearm next to the Pop. Again when wet, it does slip further to my wrist crease than I would prefer.
4. The data shows your AVERAGE results. The problem with AVERAGE data and results is that you will only ever achieve AVERAGE improvements. I would like to see the individual shots listed as per the Qlipp device. The Qlipp will show me which shots, speed, sweetspot etc and I cannot see why the Pop cannot do the same and simply swap out sweetspot for PIQ score. It's great having a one off PIQ of 9000, but what did I do and when? And how can I learn to repeat it? With the Qlipp you can see how often you hit good/bad shots and learn accordingly. The Qlipp breaks down your FH, BH, serve (top, flat, slice) so you can learn far more with regards to your strengths and weakness. As I said earlier, AVERAGE data will only give AVERAGE results.
5. Data separation: I have learned that I can switch on/off the Pop to record separate sets in a match, but I would like to see a way to combine this data to see how a match progresses.
6: Speed recognition: I know it relates to wrist speed and not racket or ball speed. On Pop I have hit a 68mph serve, on Qlipp 100mph and I will find my Speedtrac Radar and retest with the Pop. My suspicion is that my serve on the Speedtrac will not break 85mph, although being placed at the net deceleration needs to be taken in to account.
7. Some form of text edit facility to the data so that I can add more useful information to look back upon. I would also like this to be retrospective as it is just text.
Overall: the Pop is a nice device that (unfathomably by Babolat/PIQ) seems to be being held back from its true potential by its basic app data. The app feels more like a "social" tool and is a bit 'wishy-washy' compared to the slick and infinitely more detailed Qlipp app. Improving the metrics available on the Pop app should be a necessity, rather than a luxury by including a "basic" and "advanced" user interface option. If in doubt, just plagiarise the Qlipp.
Again, I'm not writing anything that is new to this thread - Babolat/PIQ please help and take notice, we just want the best from you!
