Exactly like it. 110%Hi, I was wondering if the Babolat Pure Strike VS feels similar to the Babolat Pure Control. Thanks!
I think the extra 10% would make it not "exact".Exactly like it. 110%
Deja vu - "The tungsten case"?Except there is no Flex Carbon, as Babolat Official has said. So I wonder how could they possibly play the same...
I don't think so, TW specs (strung) are RA 62 with Flex Carbon, RA 65 without (new version)Deja vu - "The tungsten case"?
That's a first.I don't think so, TW specs (strung) are RA 62 with Flex Carbon, RA 65 without (new version)
According to maxpotapov the numbers are the other way around - the racquet with Flex Carbon being softer.So, it turns out that flex carbon is actually stiff carbon if the numbers are higher with it.
AFAIK that spec is not measured by TWE, it is what the manufacturer states.Unstrung stiffness is as quoted above from TWE.
Yep. From a producers perspective it's fantastic, from a buyers perspective, not so much.A lower density of carbon fibers means cheaper. 1K is cheaper than 5K for sure.![]()
Which is a great news for me!The Pure Strike VS is the same racket as the Pure Control. Only update is cosmetic. The Pure Strike VS Tour is the same as the Pure Control Tour, though with a new cosmetic.