hmmmmmmm ... a "brand new user" who registered in May ... and this is his first post ...
... and on top of that, he's a *********, making bold pro roger posts ... but not until 3 months after registering ... hmmmmm
wonder who s/he really is
hmmmmmmm ... a "brand new user" who registered in May ... and this is his first post ...
... and on top of that, he's a *********, making bold pro roger posts ... but not until 3 months after registering ... hmmmmm
wonder who s/he really is
Yes, I wonder which is more bizarre - that some poster waits three months for the first post, or some other poster rains 18000 posts in 2 years.
that's no answer to my query at all. It's a pathetic ad hominem in an attempt to defend "new user"
wonder why someone would do that? Jump to the defense of a "new user" by flaming an established member of the community? hint: Posting is a good thing here, not a bad thing -- get with the program
hello! havent you learned anything yet? there's a club of rogertards who create duplicate identities for the express purpose of trolling threads in which he's one of the players.
p.s. the question was not "which is more bizarre", but rather the question was, "I wonder who s/he really is"?
hint: Posting is a good thing here, not a bad thing -- get with the program
There are "****s" connected to many players, not just Federer. And yes, I've learned quite a bit in my 5 years here. Enough to find one person with more than 10 duplicates - and a few others with 4 or 5 duplicates. I also learned not to be suspicious of someone after one post. That member has posted once and you say that he is making "bold pro-roger posts." Yes, one of us clearly over-reacted
. .
hmmmmmmm ... a "brand new user" who registered in May ... and this is his first post ...
... and on top of that, he's a *********, making bold pro roger posts ... but not until 3 months after registering ... hmmmmm
wonder who s/he really is
hmmmmmmm ... a "brand new user" who registered in May ... and this is his first post ...
... and on top of that, he's a *********, making bold pro roger posts ... but not until 3 months after registering ... hmmmmm
wonder who s/he really is
not too particular about "quoting," are you, oh brainy one?
now that you've called someone else "dumb," how bout showing us how smart you are by returning the ball @ http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showpost.php?p=4972236&postcount=1074
you got that right Mixie, you sound very wise for someone new here
I welcome you to the board/.
who do you think will win the other sf? I think final is andy -Rodge and the latter will take care of his puppy.
that's no answer to my query at all. It's a pathetic ad hominem in an attempt to defend "new user"
wonder why someone would do that? Jump to the defense of a "new user" by flaming an established member of the community? hint: Posting is a good thing here, not a bad thing -- get with the program
hello! havent you learned anything yet? there's a club of rogertards who create duplicate identities for the express purpose of trolling threads in which he's one of the players.
p.s. the question was not "which is more bizarre", but rather the question was, "I wonder who s/he really is"?
If he wins then he and Murray would both have 170 pts, I read. Making Murray the leader because he beat Fed once.
