Expanding from the previous post, here are the W/L records of the Big 4 in grand slams against the best player in the world or the second best player in the world if the Big 4 player was ranked number 1.
Federer: 14 matches (9 finals)
W/L: 5-9 (3-6 in finals)
Nadal: 15 matches (13 finals)
W/L: 10-5 (8-5 in finals)
Djokovic: 12 matches (9 finals)
W/L: 4-8 (3-6 in finals)
Murray: 9 matches (3 finals)
W/L: 2-7 (1-2 in finals)
Nadal seems to be the outlier here and he is the only player to have wins at every slam. Djokovic has wins at every slam except for the French. Murray has wins at the USO and Wimbledon. All of Federer's 5 wins came at Wimbledon, meaning that he has never beaten the number 1 player or the number 2 player under him at a slam outside of Wimbledon. I just find that hard to believe knowing that he has won 17 slams (possibly 18 tomorrow?) and made 25 finals. I think this says something about the consistency of the top players during the majority of Fed's slam wins. Sure, there's nothing he can do about it, but it doesn't change the facts.
Federer: 14 matches (9 finals)
W/L: 5-9 (3-6 in finals)
Nadal: 15 matches (13 finals)
W/L: 10-5 (8-5 in finals)
Djokovic: 12 matches (9 finals)
W/L: 4-8 (3-6 in finals)
Murray: 9 matches (3 finals)
W/L: 2-7 (1-2 in finals)
Nadal seems to be the outlier here and he is the only player to have wins at every slam. Djokovic has wins at every slam except for the French. Murray has wins at the USO and Wimbledon. All of Federer's 5 wins came at Wimbledon, meaning that he has never beaten the number 1 player or the number 2 player under him at a slam outside of Wimbledon. I just find that hard to believe knowing that he has won 17 slams (possibly 18 tomorrow?) and made 25 finals. I think this says something about the consistency of the top players during the majority of Fed's slam wins. Sure, there's nothing he can do about it, but it doesn't change the facts.
Last edited: