Maestroesque
Professional
he also claims Murray is the fourth guy...
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp....-world-finals-tennis/index.html?client=safari
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp....-world-finals-tennis/index.html?client=safari
You see, Becker is admitting there is no real competition for Novak and the field is weak without Fedal in prime form.
Over and above that, the excuses keep coming from Team Djokovic--injuries, personal problems, lack of motivation and now Djokovic wasn't interested enough because of no real competition. Gotta love it!
So Djokovic had weak results in the last 6 months because Federer and Nadal weren't playing.
Stop doing crack, Beckerowski. Djokovic had no issues winning a gazillion titles from mid 2014 to mid 2016 when both Federer and Nadal were playing way below their best but he suddenly has them now.
Didn't say that. He said lack of Nadal and fed has made Djokovic lose a motivation without talking about prime level etc. Nowhere does he imply the field is weak.
Even if so it's not because Federer and Nadal became non-factors. Nadal has been a non-factor since mid 2014 when Djokovic started to enjoy his domination. Federer wasn't a threat in the Slams too, only in BO3.I don't think this is excuses. I think it is just the truth, Novak has lost motivation and he even admit it himself after his FO Victory. It is evident on his game.
Didn't say that. He said lack of Nadal and fed has made Djokovic lose motivation without talking about prime level etc. Nowhere does he imply the field is weak.
I don't think this is excuses. I think it is just the truth, Novak has lost motivation and he even admit it himself after his FO Victory. It is evident on his game.
How can someone who reached several Slam finals not be a threat at Slams?Even if so it's not because Federer and Nadal became non-factors. Nadal has been a non-factor since mid 2014 when Djokovic started to enjoy his domination. Federer wasn't a threat in the Slams too, only in BO3.
Even if so it's not because Federer and Nadal became non-factors. Nadal has been a non-factor since mid 2014 when Djokovic started to enjoy his domination. Federer wasn't a threat in the Slams too, only in BO3.
Not for Djokovic. The last year Federer was a factor everywhere was 2012. Since then he doesn't have the stamina to challenge someone like Djokovic in a 4h match.How can someone who reached several Slam finals not be a threat at Slams?![]()
Well he mentioned other stuff that was the reason for loss of motivation if we look at the article. He didn't have any big goal anymore, and he started prioritizing off court stuff. So Becker doesn't just mention nadal and federer
I can somewhat agree with that but no Federer and Nadal was definitely not a big factor for his sudden lack of motivation. It's just a dumb excuse.Well he mentioned other stuff that was the reason for loss of motivation if we look at the article. He didn't have any big goal anymore, and he started prioritizing off court stuff. So Becker doesn't just mention nadal and federer
He got the NCYGS. After 44 years he was the first player to hold all 4 titles. Not good enough sunshine ?That is horsesh*t! He had the CYGS to go after and Fed's slam count for starters! Do his fans believe everything? There is more going on here than we know. The whole thing doesn't make sense.
That is horsesh*t! He had the CYGS to go after and Fed's slam count for starters! Do his fans believe everything? There is more going on here than we know. The whole thing doesn't make sense.
He got the NCYGS. After 44 years he was the first player to hold all 4 titles. Not good enough sunshine ?
Did you hear Murray's speech ? Did you hear him mentioning it ? The media is the media, and were always anti-Djokovic.No, it really isn't. Did you see the big fuss the media made over that accomplishment?
The CYGS is much more valuable and yet your hero wilted like a lettuce leaf left out in the sun when he should have been motivated to win the CYGS and to chase Federer's record. Why the hell would he lose motivation with those goals in possible reach? That's right, he wouldn't. Something doesn't make sense here.
He already won four in a row, same as CYGS. to get all 4 in a calender slam he had to proceed and win 6 slams in a row. The guy is not a machine. He is just a person like me and you. Is it an excuse that his head and body couldn't take it anymore after everything he did? If you saw him at Wimbledon it was clearly evident that it was a guy who was totally burnt out.
Did you hear Murray's speech ? Did you hear him mentioning it ? The media is the media, and were always anti-Djokovic.
If it wasn't such a big deal, why didn't Federer acheive it ?
Rafa was injured for most of 2014 and only played half a season effectively. In 2015 he was still lacking in form and injured for most of 2016. Becker is right; there should be an asterisk against Djokovic's RG title because Nadal pulled out due to injury.So Djokovic had weak results in the last 6 months because Federer and Nadal weren't playing.
Stop doing crack, Beckerowski. Djokovic had no issues winning a gazillion titles from mid 2014 to mid 2016 when both Federer and Nadal were playing way below their best more often than not but he suddenly has them now. Go eat a sandwich.
He got the NCYGS. After 44 years he was the first player to hold all 4 titles. Not good enough sunshine ?
How can Murray be Djoko's little brother when Murray is 2 weeks older than him?Djoker will either remotivate or he will get used to losing and eventually be tired of the game. I'm afraid the trajectory is for the latter. For him Murray will always be like his little brother and those post game pats on the shoulder cannot be more gratuitous and fake.
Except it's not the same as the CYGS at all. It's a great accomplishment but it doesn't have the perceived value of a CYGS which is the ultimate tennis goal.
But that's nothing for these drongos. He had without a doubt the greatest 18 months in tennis history, but that is nothing, because he didn't continue, or he hasn't got 17 slams against Bagdhatis, Roddick, Phillipousis.His name was attached to all the four grand slam titles at the same time, he won them all consecutively on three different surfaces. No one in the history has done such a thing and the last time that happened was in 69 but Laver won them when 3/4 surfaces were played on grass.
Anyways, my point was that he held all the slams at the same time, to win the last 2 he had to win 6 in a row.
Novak is the only player to have experienced this along with Laver and Budge, so nobody else actually knows how it really feels and if motivation can do anything to keep someone going for so long. Sometimes motivation takes a big hit when your head and body is burnt out, maaybe this was the case with Novak. Along with that he also achieved his big career goal to win the FO to complete CGS. I think he actually said himself aswell that he was tired after all of that. And he didn't just win four in a row, in between that he won masters and the WTFs aswell.
Really huh ? Need I remind you that he beat Nadal in 2015 RG ?Rafa was injured for most of 2014 and only played half a season effectively. In 2015 he was still lacking in form and injured for most of 2016. Becker is right; there should be an asterisk against Djokovic's RG title because Nadal pulled out due to injury.
He didn't say it was a weak era at all.This is embarassing for Novak that Becker admits weak era
But that's nothing for these drongos. He had without a doubt the greatest 18 months in tennis history, but that is nothing, because he didn't continue, or he hasn't got 17 slams against Bagdhatis, Roddick, Phillipousis.
But that's nothing for these drongos. He had without a doubt the greatest 18 months in tennis history, but that is nothing, because he didn't continue, or he hasn't got 17 slams against Bagdhatis, Roddick, Phillipousis.
He didn't say it was a weak era at all.
Everybody hears what they want to hear.
So you think it's that easy, do you ?So, what happened to all the talk about Novak is a man on mission to be the greatest player in tennis history , will not stop until he gets 18 slams and all that , has the Serbian hunger and all that jazz. Just fizzled out after 12 majors - little over half way down the pike ?
And Andy stepped up to fill the void. He didn't say anything against Andy.LOL.. Explain to me what this means
"He didn't have any opponents anymore," the German tennis great, who has coached the Serb to six grand slam titles since December 2013, told CNN's World Sport show
So you think it's that easy, do you ?
It's called quality over quantity.
Your guy had to wait 5 years into his career to have a rival. And got beaten ruthlessly once he found him.
And Andy stepped up to fill the void. He didn't say anything against Andy.
Keep on dreaming about a weak era chumps. It doesn't compare to the chumps Federer played against 2003-2007.
So Fed's slam record, fighting for no.1 in the WTF final, Fed's 302 weeks at no.1, Fed's 6 WTF titles weren't goals for Djokovic? And some of them were within his grasp too.Well he mentioned other stuff that was the reason for loss of motivation if we look at the article. He didn't have any big goal anymore, and he started prioritizing off court stuff. So Becker doesn't just mention nadal and federer
And Andy stepped up to fill the void. He didn't say anything against Andy.
Keep on dreaming about a weak era chumps. It doesn't compare to the chumps Federer played against 2003-2007.
So Fed's slam record, fighting for no.1 in the WTF final, Fed's 302 weeks at no.1, Fed's 6 WTF titles weren't goals for Djokovic? And some of them were within his grasp too.
I have just mentioned several goals for Novak. How could he lose motivation like that when he still had goals?
So Fed's slam record, fighting for no.1 in the WTF final, Fed's 302 weeks at no.1, Fed's 6 WTF titles weren't goals for Djokovic? And some of them were within his grasp too.
I have just mentioned several goals for Novak. How could he lose motivation like that when he still had goals?
Bye bye Fed fan boys (there is a difference bw fanboys and fans)......will be ignoring all you cult members.
By the way, pick up a racket, and go and have a hit. Most of you are 3.0 level players, who try to dress like pros. A laughing stock on the court. A laughing stock on this forum.
Cheerio.
Bye bye Fed fan boys (there is a difference bw fanboys and fans)......will be ignoring all you cult members.
By the way, pick up a racket, and go and have a hit. Most of you are 3.0 level players, who try to dress like pros. A laughing stock on the court. A laughing stock on this forum.
Cheerio.