Becker: "I Feel Pressured by Roger Federer for World No.1"

tennisaddict

Bionic Poster
I doubt Novak felt any shame at all. It's not like it's the first time a 33 year old player still ranked in the top 3 has beaten the #1 player is it? On the other hand losing 23 times out of 33 matches to your biggest rival is far, far worse. Thankfully my guy will never experience the ignominy of such a one sided H2H.

While you enjoy the h2h, we will bask in the glory of 17-6-302. To each their own.
 
D

Deleted member 307496

Guest
Just thought I might say that Djokovic wasn't playing terrible in Shanghai (better at Wimbledon though) and that Federer's victory over him is legit. He could have also beaten Djokovic in Wimbledon.
 
D

Deleted member 307496

Guest
If Djokovic faced peak Nadal at Roland Garros year after year he wouldn't beat him. That's what hurts Djokovic fans the most, knowing that he could outdo Fed at anything.
 

Djokovic2011

Bionic Poster
He isn't a servebot. Djokovic just isn't as good on the return as you think.

Just because Djokovic isn't so great at returning Federer's serve doesn't mean he isn't as good as I think. In all my years of watching tennis I'd say he's probably the best I've ever seen. Put the haterade away for at least one day.
 

Djokovic2011

Bionic Poster
If Djokovic faced peak Nadal at Roland Garros year after year he wouldn't beat him. That's what hurts Djokovic fans the most, knowing that he could outdo Fed at anything.

Actually I'd say Djokovic 2011 would have beaten several versions of Nadal at RG. And I'm not sure what you mean in your last sentence.
 

Djokovic2011

Bionic Poster
Just thought I might say that Djokovic wasn't playing terrible in Shanghai (better at Wimbledon though) and that Federer's victory over him is legit. He could have also beaten Djokovic in Wimbledon.

But he didn't because he wasn't good enough on the day so who cares?
 
D

Deleted member 307496

Guest
Just because Djokovic isn't so great at returning Federer's serve doesn't mean he isn't as good as I think. In all my years of watching tennis I'd say he's probably the best I've ever seen. Put the haterade away for at least one day.
Exactly what I mean.
 

smoledman

G.O.A.T.
I honestly can't care about the Nadal H2H given the 5y age difference. I know that Fed was 6-8 against Nadal from 2004-2007, that's good enough for me.

Otherwise yeah I'll take 17-6-302.
 
D

Deleted member 307496

Guest
Not sure you know what I mean. FYI I've been watching tennis longer than you.
You watching tennis for 2 whole years longer than me makes such a difference to this debate; which is opinionated. I will never understand how you think that Djokovic peaking for a year is better than Federer peaking for 3 or Nadal winning the French Open 9 times, 5 of which are in a row isn't up to his standard.

I have said Djokovic is better than 2 of my favorite players, Hewitt and Agassi; but you still insist on saying he is better than Federer and Nadal; when he should be compared to one of my favorites really..
 

Djokovic2011

Bionic Poster
I will never understand how you think that Djokovic peaking for a year is better than Federer peaking for 3 or Nadal winning the French Open 9 times, 5 of which are in a row isn't up to his standard.

Except I've never said this so I've no idea what you're talking about. Here's a piece of advice for you Sabratha. Scream at the top of your voice "I hate Novak Djokovic" and perhaps smash a few old plates for good measure. You'll feel so much better for it afterwards.
 

smoledman

G.O.A.T.
Why not just admit that Novak is not in the Fed/Nadal league and leave it at that? He's a tier-2 great and that's his ceiling.
 

tennisaddict

Bionic Poster
Why not just admit that Novak is not in the Fed/Nadal league and leave it at that? He's a tier-2 great and that's his ceiling.

Ending of 2010, it looked like Andy Murray was taking over from Fedal. Novak did the unthinkable and he showed how great a player he was. He and his fans should feel proud and happy about it rather than comparing with Fedal and feeling worse.
 
D

Deleted member 307496

Guest
Except I've never said this so I've no idea what you're talking about. Here's a piece of advice for you Sabratha. Scream at the top of your voice "I hate Novak Djokovic" and perhaps smash a few old plates for good measure. You'll feel so much better for it afterwards.
I don't hate Djokovic. You just love him.
 
D

Deleted member 307496

Guest
Yes you do so please dispense with the pretence. And why do you think I love him? Just because I defend him? Well someone's gotta do it and I'm definitely the man for the job.
So just because I don't rate him as highly as you, it means I hate him? Good grief.
 

Djokovic2011

Bionic Poster
So just because I don't rate him as highly as you, it means I hate him? Good grief.

You're always nitpicking at anything he's achieved and I don't ever recall your saying a nice thing about him so yeah, I don't think I'm too far off the mark.
 
D

Deleted member 307496

Guest
You're always nitpicking at anything he's achieved and I don't ever recall your saying a nice thing about him so yeah, I don't think I'm too far off the mark.
I don't nitpick what he has achieved as long as it isn't drawn out of proportion. For example "the highest peak ever".
 

Djokovic2011

Bionic Poster
I don't nitpick what he has achieved as long as it isn't drawn out of proportion. For example "the highest peak ever".

Which is an opinion which is what this forum's all about. Don't let it get to you so much just because you don't agree with it. What difference does it make to you anyway if Nole has the greatest peak as long as Federer has the greater resume?
 

MichaelNadal

Bionic Poster
I don't think that would've happened at all in 2011. Throw out all the other years when they're not the ones being discussed.

I'm talking about 2011. Djokovic beat Nadal on clay before the FO this year and last year, and the Miami beating this year was probably the worse he's ever given Nadal. It made no difference.
 

Djokovic2011

Bionic Poster
I'm talking about 2011. Djokovic beat Nadal on clay before the FO this year and last year, and the Miami beating this year was probably the worse he's ever given Nadal. It made no difference.

His level in 2011 was higher than any other year. How many times do I have to say this? Makes no difference if Nadal beat him at RG a hundred times before that year and since. Why so defensive about it? No one's gonna take the trophy from that year away from him. And Nadal's been beaten at RG before anyway so stop acting like he's this unbeatable machine there.
 
http://www.**************.org/Editor/Img/Boris-Becker-feeling-Federer%26acute%3Bs-pressure-No.1-img23647_668.jpg

Boris Becker, coach of Novak Djokovic, revealed to be feeling under pressure for the run to the year-end World No.1. The six-time Slam champion feels Roger Federer very close.

As long as Nole doesn't secured the YE #1, Becker's worrisome will have a hard time getting a good night sleep.

[url="http://www.**************.org/Boris-Becker-I-Feel-Pressured-by-Roger-Federer-for-World-No1-articolo20821.html']Read more[/url]

So sad Boris looks bad he really aged badly he used to be so handsome.At least Stefan Edberg still has his good looks he's FIT!
 
D

Deleted member 688153

Guest
Judging by the competition on clay in recent years I'd probably give Nadal a tougher match than we've seen from many other players which is actually quite tragic.

His RG draw this year was an absolute gem in the early rounds.
 

merlinpinpin

Hall of Fame
All that matters is the year in question and the fact remains that Federer hasn't won a Slam in 2014. You can throw out everything he achieved in all the preceding years.

Yes and no. Sampras was also totally slamless the year he took the #1 spot from the first time. And he took it from Courier who was holding two slams. And yet he didn't get a thousandth of the flak Wozniaki got, because he had won a (single) slam to and a half years before. Makes a world of difference, actually.

For getting to #1, winning slams is actually a huge *help* (2,000 points each, people). Getting them without winning slams is actually doing it the hard way (you need much better results overall). And as long as you don't have the "he/she never won a slam, so he/she's not fit to hold the #1 ever" stigma, then it's fair game. And let's be frank, Federer is about as far as you can be from that stigma.

That would be like Nadal not winning anything on clay and getting an award for best clay player, with trolls coming out of the woodwork to remind us that "oh, but only the YTD results count." That would be just as silly, imho.
 

merlinpinpin

Hall of Fame
Yet he couldn't beat Federer. :lol: Nadal would have made it 7-0.

Actually, had they played at RG that year, I think *Djokovic* would have made it 7-0, instead of having to wait until AO 2012 for his seventh straight victory over Nadal. At that time, he really had the belief, and that made all the difference.

Because, let's be honest, gamewise, Djokovic has everything he needs to beat Nadal just about everywhere. But for the last couple of years, he's been having mental issues again and losing matches he should have won because he lost the focus and hunger when he needed them the most (RG 2013, USO 2013, even RG 2014 is debatable to a point).

Djokovic has no business being behind in the H2H, he should be ahead by now. Needs more work on the mental side of things, though.
 

Gary Duane

Talk Tennis Guru
Yes and no. Sampras was also totally slamless the year he took the #1 spot from the first time. And he took it from Courier who was holding two slams. And yet he didn't get a thousandth of the flak Wozniaki got, because he had won a (single) slam to and a half years before. Makes a world of difference, actually.
Sampras was slamless in 91 and 92. He wasn't #1 until 93, right?

Or did I screw up?
For getting to #1, winning slams is actually a huge *help* (2,000 points each, people). Getting them without winning slams is actually doing it the hard way (you need much better results overall).
I agree with you there. I don't think Fed will make it to #1 this year, but if he does I think he will deserve it, as will Novak if he holds on to it.
 

merlinpinpin

Hall of Fame
Sampras was slamless in 91 and 92. He wasn't #1 until 93, right?

Or did I screw up?

I agree with you there. I don't think Fed will make it to #1 this year, but if he does I think he will deserve it, as will Novak if he holds on to it.

No, you're right, but maybe I just wasn't clear enough. He got to #1 in 1993 *before* he won his first slam that year, so he wasn't holding any slam when he got to it. And yet, as far as I know, nobody ever said he was an "undeserving" #1 at that time.
 
D

Deleted member 307496

Guest
No, you're right, but maybe I just wasn't clear enough. He got to #1 in 1993 *before* he won his first slam that year, so he wasn't holding any slam when he got to it. And yet, as far as I know, nobody ever said he was an "undeserving" #1 at that time.
Because he won a slam that year anyway.
 

Gary Duane

Talk Tennis Guru
No, you're right, but maybe I just wasn't clear enough. He got to #1 in 1993 *before* he won his first slam that year, so he wasn't holding any slam when he got to it. And yet, as far as I know, nobody ever said he was an "undeserving" #1 at that time.
That's a pretty weak argument.

I thought you were comparing Sampras in 1993 to Fed in 2014...
 

helloworld

Hall of Fame
Yes and no. Sampras was also totally slamless the year he took the #1 spot from the first time. And he took it from Courier who was holding two slams. And yet he didn't get a thousandth of the flak Wozniaki got, because he had won a (single) slam to and a half years before. Makes a world of difference, actually.

For getting to #1, winning slams is actually a huge *help* (2,000 points each, people). Getting them without winning slams is actually doing it the hard way (you need much better results overall). And as long as you don't have the "he/she never won a slam, so he/she's not fit to hold the #1 ever" stigma, then it's fair game. And let's be frank, Federer is about as far as you can be from that stigma.

That would be like Nadal not winning anything on clay and getting an award for best clay player, with trolls coming out of the woodwork to remind us that "oh, but only the YTD results count." That would be just as silly, imho.
Sampras won slam in all of the years that he was world no.1. He won Wimbledon AND US Open in 1993, the first year he became world no.1.
 

Silverbullet96

Hall of Fame
Yeah, I am sure the bloated Becker is really worried! :roll:

Do you not know the meaning of "PR" and creating a story for the media?

I doubt Federer will go after the year end number one. After all, didn't he make negative comments a few years back about Jelena Jankovic climbing to number one without a slam win? Based on those comments I think he would be a little embarrassed to have the number one spot without a slam win. To me it looks like he is going after the DC rather than the year end number one. Let's see if he plays Bercy. If he doesn't, that will tell us he doesn't care at all about the year end number one at this stage in his career.

I don't think Federer avoids World No. 1 because of something like that :roll:
 
My money's on Becker ending the year number 1. His serve and volley is superior to Federer's imho.

agreed. he should talk to roger, ask him for his magic formula for staying young and healthy forever. maybe with the right "nutrition", boris can come back to professional tennis.
 
^Haha, yes.^ Boris' people might know that but his ego will not listen.

I bet boris is looking to stay relevant and advertise that he takes a lot of ownership of his position as coach of the tour's top player.

I am not too concerned about his premature aging, but, i am sure we can chalk it up to beer und brats, some road years, MANY late nights, the stress of carrying the ego und aura of THE boris becker, and the trappings of brutal sun damage to a fair complexion. I am more comcerned about what a self-important blowhard he has become. He seriously makes mac look humble and hardworking.
 

smoledman

G.O.A.T.
^Haha, yes.^ Boris' people might know that but his ego will not listen.

I bet boris is looking to stay relevant and advertise that he takes a lot of ownership of his position as coach of the tour's top player.

I am not too concerned about his premature aging, but, i am sure we can chalk it up to beer und brats, some road years, MANY late nights, the stress of carrying the ego und aura of THE boris becker, and the trappings of brutal sun damage to a fair complexion. I am more comcerned about what a self-important blowhard he has become. He seriously makes mac look humble and hardworking.

I think Andy Murray should consider hiring JMac as coach. Teach him the Serve/Volley, Chip&Charge game that Edberg has given Roger.
 
I think Andy Murray should consider hiring JMac as coach. Teach him the Serve/Volley, Chip&Charge game that Edberg has given Roger.

Yes. Good fit. This could be so good. but would mac commit to that kind of stress and misery? Would andy listen and communicate in the way mac is accustomed?
They both have remarkable feel for the ball and are both deceptively quick. Also the same hair and similar heritage.
 

Blitzball

Professional
Yes. Good fit. This could be so good. but would mac commit to that kind of stress and misery? Would andy listen and communicate in the way mac is accustomed?
They both have remarkable feel for the ball and are both deceptively quick. Also the same hair and similar heritage.

But then you're fueling fire with fire. Johnny Mac has cooled down over the years, but all Murray has to do is Youtube some of Mac's old matches to witness his infinite number of meltdowns. Then Murray will, naturally, end up copying his mentor on court, and get disqualified from the Australian Open.
 

TMF

Talk Tennis Guru
Federer made a better choice at picking a coach than Nole.

Edberg is a better coach than Becker.

Remember Nole made a bad choice by picking Todd Martin as a coach.
 
TMF said:
Becker: "I Feel Pressured by Roger Federer for World No.1"

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.**************.org/Editor...g23647_668.jpg

Boris Becker, coach of Novak Djokovic, revealed to be feeling under pressure for the run to the year-end World No.1. The six-time Slam champion feels Roger Federer very close.

As long as Nole doesn't secured the YE #1, Becker's worrisome will have a hard time getting a good night sleep.

Read more


Great thread.

__________________
 
Top