Nostradamus
Bionic Poster
So you are saying Andy will Beat Novak in French open next year in 2016 ?Murray pushed novak to 5th set in frenchopen why are you so sure novak would win this
So you are saying Andy will Beat Novak in French open next year in 2016 ?Murray pushed novak to 5th set in frenchopen why are you so sure novak would win this
The same way Olympic means something.
I have read enough of your posts regarding Rafa to know that simply is not true.If Nadal won the WTF, id be happy for him to complete all the "big" events.
So you are saying Andy will Beat Novak in French open next year in 2016 ?
Somewhere Federer is listening laughing is arse off.Lol@ John Lloyd making out that Djokovic is the only player capable of beating Murray these days.![]()
Lol@ John Lloyd making out that Djokovic is the only player capable of beating Murray these days.![]()
That was David Lloyd.LOL, he said that? Isn't this the same guy that was berating Murray just a few days ago for not doing enough for British tennis. That guy is a clown.
Tbh it's the kind of statement I'd expect Andrew Castle to come out with. Lloyd seems to have completely forgotten what happened to Murray the last five times he played Federer.LOL, he said that? Isn't this the same guy that was berating Murray just a few days ago for not doing enough for British tennis. That guy is a clown.
That was David Lloyd.
Tbh it's the kind of statement I'd expect Andrew Castle to come out with. Lloyd seems to have completely forgotten what happened to Murray the last five times he played Federer.
That guy still has a job commentating after what he said about Rafa during the AO 2014 F!Christophe Rochus commenting : " Andy would have won many more slams if he was born 8 years earlier"![]()
Lol@ John Lloyd making out that Djokovic is the only player capable of beating Murray these days.![]()
Federer?Lawl 2-10 against Djokovic, Federer, Nadal, Wawrinka combined.
But let's give it to him, other than Djokovic he's been by far the most consistent player out there.
Let's say consistency = at least the SF (so playing to your seed/ranking)Federer?
Let's say consistency = at least the SF (so playing to your seed/ranking)
Federer
Slams - 2/4
Masters - 3/7
WTF - 1/1
Murray
Slams - 3/4
Masters - 7/8
WTF - 0/1
Federer was able to make a bigger dent when he got past the QF but Murray got there more consistently.
MhysaAll Hail the Muzziah
![]()
Lawl 2-10 against Djokovic, Federer, Nadal, Wawrinka combined.
But let's give it to him, other than Djokovic he's been by far the most consistent player out there. He just needs to do better against the top top players.
I would agree with this. Murray had great consistency overall.
Fair enough.Let's say consistency = at least the SF (so playing to your seed/ranking)
Federer
Slams - 2/4
Masters - 3/7
WTF - 1/1
Murray
Slams - 3/4
Masters - 7/8
WTF - 0/1
Federer was able to make a bigger dent when he got past the QF (made the final each time and won Cincinnati) but Murray got there more consistently.
What a terrible rendition of the GB national anthem. Yuck.
It's fitting, it's a terrible national anthem. There is no good version, so why bother trying?