Agree with the Pete-Andre match. Other great ones:I would add Sampras-Agassi US Open 2001. Great match from both.
Definitely Edberg Stich is a good one.Agree with the Pete-Andre match. Other great ones:
1991 Wimbledon semi where Edberg lost the match to Stich without having his serve broken: 4-6, 7-6 (7-5), 7-6 (7-5), 7-6 (7-2)
2011 Fed-Djoker FO
1981 Wimbledon final Mac over Borg 4–6, 7–6 (1), 7–6 (4), 6–4
A 6-1 fourth set might have precluded it being mentioned. One of the few matches where Rafa clearly ran out of gas.2011 USO final. Disappointed that it didn't make the poll.
The match itself wasn't particularly high quality, save for that third set which was one of the best I've ever seen.2011 USO final. Disappointed that it didn't make the poll.
@Yugram @HetTheGreaterer @TheGhostOfAgassi @125downthemiddle @ForehandRF @TripleATeam
USO 2001 leads the vote
A 6-1 fourth set might have precluded it being mentioned. One of the few matches where Rafa clearly ran out of gas.
Who was the previous HC GOAT?????2015 USO F. Previous HC GOAT vs current HC GOAT, both at peak, neutral surface.
That last part sounds familiar.2015 USO F. Previous HC GOAT vs current HC GOAT, both at peak, neutral surface.
federer before 2020 AOWho was the previous HC GOAT?????
@Yugram @HetTheGreaterer @TheGhostOfAgassi @125downthemiddle @ForehandRF @TripleATeam
USO 2001 leads the vote
That’s so funny.
I doubt everyone has even seen the match from the beginning to the end recently like we did.
NO break of serve! How fun and great!
We learn a lot from these watch parties! I like it. It’s like myth busters.
But I thought Federer got all of his slams beating baghdatis, bahmet, keifer, philippousis, and crippled gravinbogganis?federer before 2020 AO
Novak has surpassed federer on HCs and is on his way to do it on grass too. 2019 AO final was on another planet, the way he destroyed a fellow peak ATGBut I thought Federer got all of his slams beating baghdatis, bahmet, keifer, philippousis, and crippled gravinbogganis?
Djoker dovotee, stop cheating readers!Novak has surpassed federer on HCs and is on his way to do it on grass too. 2019 AO final was on another planet, the way he destroyed a fellow peak ATG![]()
Hell no lol.We have indeed learnt a lot from it. Imo, the match was great, but not "the greatest 4 setter". Even nadal-thiem this year at AO was better.
dunno bout that lolWe have indeed learnt a lot from it. Imo, the match was great, but not "the greatest 4 setter". Even nadal-thiem this year at AO was better.
Just watched the match from the beginning to the end. Shockingly boring and very overrated match.dunno bout that lol
Hell no lol.
Try watching full match live.dunno bout that lol
I watched it when it happened and a few times after. Don't condescend to me because you got to check it out for the first time.Try watching full match live.
You should have been there when we had the watch party to lift our spirits. Everyone there, from all all fanbases, had a hard time to even endure that match.I watched it when it happened and a few times after. Don't condescend to me because you got to check it out for the first time.![]()
Leave alone the fact that there was no moment (before or during the match) when there were any doubts about the winner. The outcome was totally NID, and the match wasn't even close. So not sure how is it suddenly called the best 4 set match of all time.The match itself wasn't particularly high quality, save for that third set which was one of the best I've ever seen.
Yeah I was a bit too exaggerated when I said about this year's thiemdal.I watched it when it happened and a few times after. Don't condescend to me because you got to check it out for the first time.
I don't even think it's like the best 4 set match ever but it sure beats this year's Thiemdal encounter.
@TheAssassin can be the member for the upcoming parties. New joiners are always funYou should have been there when we had the watch party to lift our spirits. Everyone there, from all all fanbases, had a hard time to even endure that match.
Yeah, it's not a match particularly high in the drama department, it's about the glorious art of tennis itself. They are both playing soooooooooooo well right up till the end of the 4th set where loose errors finally creep into Andre's game, and that glimpse of human frailty is all that proves the difference.Yeah I was a bit too exaggerated when I said about this year's thiemdal.
But the matches with no breaks of serve are kind of difficult to digest
A 6-1 fourth set might have precluded it being mentioned. One of the few matches where Rafa clearly ran out of gas.
Having checked some highlights it's hard to disagree with this. So much aggressive shotmaking; the winners must have been through the roof. Those sick Sampras half volleys and Agassi's early 00s renaissance ballstriking... What's not to like? Love the matchup.Surprised so many people are ragging on the USO 2001 QF, I've seen it end to end and thought it was a super high quality match. The view at the time was that was an instant classic as well.
Different strokes for different folks I guess.
Most of viewers probably didn’t grow up watching those guys so I can partially understand. I find it hard to watch 80s and earlier. But Pete Agassi match up was fire.You should have been there when we had the watch party to lift our spirits. Everyone there, from all all fanbases, had a hard time to even endure that match.
History of tennis started in 1980.
No one had really watched that match recently from beginning to end, some had never watched it, and w all the hype from all the “tennis experts” in here that have seen every match ever played since the beginning of Laver time, all the time every day, I thought it would be a good idea to watch it. Cause I don’t have time or interest to watch that much tennis from all eras. And I don’t feel like pretending I’m an expert either as I feel most posters on this board do. I admit I’ve seen that match long long time ago, but no way I remembered enough to form an opinion about it now. Just some seconds of fragments of it if I’m completely honest.Most of viewers probably didn’t grow up watching those guys so I can partially understand. I find it hard to watch 80s and earlier. But Pete Agassi match up was fire.
Besides, didn't that match win the poll in favor of some other 3-4 more recent ones for the watch party? Next time think better which one you are going to vote for I guess...![]()
No one had really watched that match recently from beginning to end, some had never watched it, and w all the hype from all the “tennis experts” in here that have seen every match ever played since the beginning of Laver time, all the time every day, I thought it would be a good idea to watch it. Cause I don’t have time or interest to watch that much tennis from all eras. And I don’t feel like pretending I’m an expert either as I feel most posters on this board do. I admit I’ve seen that match long long time ago, but no way I remembered enough to form an opinion about it now.
That fire you are talking about I’m not sure. It’s probably more shown in some short clips from and in highlights. Cause to watch that whole match in one go from beginning to the end wasn’t much more exiting than watching an average servebot match w no breaks of serve. The same feeling than Isner Anderson match kept creeping in. Thank god it was only 4 sets, felt like ages.