Best items you found at thrift stores (Goodwill)?

vandre

Hall of Fame
tyvm! i used the 660 cm2 version of the trysis 250 in college. my shoulder hurts just looking at your pics!!! ;)

Found this pair of 90's Head widebodys together for a whopping $5 locally! Both in very good shape, looking forward to hitting with them. They seem quite similar to each other. the Trisys 250 is a 110in-ish head and weighs 332g strung, the Discovery Classic is 107in (I’m assuming, it’s slightly smaller) and 336g strung.

As usual, chime in if you know anything interesting about either.

LNYQ3so.jpg

CME6UCu.jpg

sRzHM0Z.jpg

2BdVzyp.jpg

Q3bXlCs.jpg

V6VBCkQ.jpg

AlFd4zk.jpg

YL7uwHi.jpg

wcJp7hg.jpg
 

Grafil Injection

Hall of Fame
After two hits with the Steffi Auto Graf, I'm impressed with what you get for a mid-low range racket in those days. Similar to the CS-160 it has ample power, and the 97sqi head with very open stringbed makes relaxed rallying easy. You do get a sense of the ceramic firmness (RA around 60) and at 357g it is a bit heavy on the arm when hitting ground-strokes, but not too bad on serves given the 6pt HL balance. The main concern is controlling the easy power/depth. Debating trying a soft poly like Revolve or PTP in one of these ceramic sticks just to see what happens. Probably better in the Steffi AG given it's bigger and heavier.
 

kevin qmto

Hall of Fame
Question: How popular was the Wilson Graphite Aggressor 95 (mid 90s version, royal blue high beam series)? I seem to find one at nearly every goodwill / Play it Again Sports in my town. The only reason I haven't just bit the bullet and picked one out is they never seem to be in great shape, when the paint chips, the frame underneath is very light in color, almost whiteish. So any chips are very noticeable and look bad. It is a full graphite frame, not an alloy fusion.
 
Last edited:

Grafil Injection

Hall of Fame
Do seem to be a lot for sale, but I only vaguely recall it. I think it is actually similar to the Auto Graf in a way: full weight and sensible specs, but stuck in no man's land being at the bottom of serious rackets (so no 'player' will use it) and at the top of recreational sticks (so too expensive for just fun users). Probably quite good, but unlikely to have any special qualities to make it become a classic. Probably worth trying if you find a nice one for <$30.
 

5sets

Hall of Fame
A pair of Nike Court Ballistec 1.3 (Rafas 2009 shoe) in my size this morning for $14. Nice throwback sneaker to wear casually.
 

Bambooman

Hall of Fame
Found a nice mint condition Wilson Hammer 5.0 Stretch. Maybe not a real gem but for $5 the price was right.

I extend all my racquets so finding ones already stretched out is nice.
 

Grafil Injection

Hall of Fame
I had to get this for £7.50, even though I could see the grommet strip and lack of drainage hole indicating that it wasn't IMF:

Slaz-Challenge-Comp-1.jpg


Identical dimensions to the Phantom IMF (and Challenge Comp IMF (although I've never seen that)): 19mm beam, 10mm cross section, 84sqi head, chamfered throat-bridge and nice leather grip. Handle shape and butt-cap is more rectangular than the IMF models, more like a Head. My specs: 350g, 32.75cm (5pt HL) balance. Glossy paintjob is ok, but not as classy as IMFs.

Slaz-Challenge-Comp-2.jpg


But string-bed is 16x19, although there is room to make it 18x20 like the IMF version, so may just have been incorrectly strung.

Slaz-Challenge-Comp-3.jpg


Minimal graphics amounting to just Slazenger in 4 places, and Graphite at the top. Very flexy and quite similar to Phantom IMF, but grommet channel is different and starts 1cm higher up. No idea what this is, other than an identical mould made for compression process. Very strange. Hits quite nice, but not as solid as IMF. Guessing a lot of fibreglass in it, and late 80s production, but I suppose it could predate the Phantom IMF.
 

5sets

Hall of Fame
@retrowagen @vsbabolat isn’t the two pieces of the frame not meeting together before the grip a sign of a cheap Kmart frame. If I remember correctly Prince Pro and others from this time the frame is all connected. If I didn’t read everyone on here regularly i definitely would have left her behind.
 

vsbabolat

G.O.A.T.
@retrowagen @vsbabolat isn’t the two pieces of the frame not meeting together before the grip a sign of a cheap Kmart frame. If I remember correctly Prince Pro and others from this time the frame is all connected. If I didn’t read everyone on here regularly i definitely would have left her behind.
No, it’s sign of an alloy or aluminum racket. The magnesium pro came out in 1984 when alloy rackets were still popular. That’s also the thing about the mid 80’s. You had variety. You had graphite, wood/graphite composites, and aluminum racquets all being sold as top end premium rackets.
 
Last edited:

coachrick

Hall of Fame
@retrowagen @vsbabolat isn’t the two pieces of the frame not meeting together before the grip a sign of a cheap Kmart frame. If I remember correctly Prince Pro and others from this time the frame is all connected. If I didn’t read everyone on here regularly i definitely would have left her behind.
As vsb said, there was variety in materials(actual variety in most cases, not just a new marketing name for the same old stuff) and the non-integral throat bridge essentially died with the Mag Pro. I can't think of another racket that had that feature that held on longer. There was little price advantage to the Mag Pro, compared with the difference between aluminum vs graphite composites. We had a couple of die-hard Mag users who were good players; but I was never drawn to it. It had a very shallow string channel and no bumper; so it was susceptible to damage from court impact(as were the strings, especially heavy gauges).
 

kevin qmto

Hall of Fame
As vsb said, there was variety in materials(actual variety in most cases, not just a new marketing name for the same old stuff) and the non-integral throat bridge essentially died with the Mag Pro. I can't think of another racket that had that feature that held on longer. There was little price advantage to the Mag Pro, compared with the difference between aluminum vs graphite composites. We had a couple of die-hard Mag users who were good players; but I was never drawn to it. It had a very shallow string channel and no bumper; so it was susceptible to damage from court impact(as were the strings, especially heavy gauges).
My dad had 2 mag pros that he used as his main from 1987-2002ish. He bought them because that what Pat Cash used to win Wimby lol. He is always very careful with his stuff so they had little wear. But for some reason I preferred how my moms Prince Classic hit over it.
 

Grafil Injection

Hall of Fame
@retrowagen @vsbabolat isn’t the two pieces of the frame not meeting together before the grip a sign of a cheap Kmart frame. If I remember correctly Prince Pro and others from this time the frame is all connected. If I didn’t read everyone on here regularly i definitely would have left her behind.
As others said, the open neck design has definitely been a sign of low range sticks for aboout the last 35 years or so. However, as well as the Mag Pro, Prince made the Precision Graphite in the Series 90 range of 1984 using the same 'mould'. It's a nice hit coming in at my favorite specs - 350g, 32cm balance. What are the specs of your Mag Pro?

Prince-Precision-Graphite-2.jpg
 

5sets

Hall of Fame
Was Cedric Pioline’s racquet essentially my alloy racquet with a white paint job over it? Or did the professionals at that time have pro stock racquets as they do now that weren’t sold in stores?
 

5sets

Hall of Fame
As others said, the open neck design has definitely been a sign of low range sticks for aboout the last 35 years or so. However, as well as the Mag Pro, Prince made the Precision Graphite in the Series 90 range of 1984 using the same 'mould'. It's a nice hit coming in at my favorite specs - 350g, 32cm balance. What are the specs of your Mag Pro?

Prince-Precision-Graphite-2.jpg
12.5 grams strung; I just have a scale…
 

Frankc

Professional
Maybe nothin special here as far as rarity of finds, but peering up at me today at the Thrift was a Jack Kramer Auto with the 7 Crown Speed Flex Fibre Face, absolutely superb condition with a slight nick maybe here and there, all original with a perfect sticker, Medium 4 5/8, original leather and straight as a string. For $3.98 , I can revisit the exact frame for my late youth competition, college comp, and prime time until 1979 when I shifted to Mac's Pro Staff, a 4 1/2 Light for me. Too cool for me to hold this beauty again...
I have a NOS set of thin Imperial Gut or early VS ready for this Kramer - easy to forget how absolutely gorgeous was the craft in this era... Too many sweet memories...
( I still feel, with maybe an obvious bias, that the "game" was a far more interesting and varied one with this era tech - more of a battle of different tactics, feel and athleticism...)
 
Last edited:

graycrait

Legend
I still feel, with maybe an obvious bias, that the "game" was a far more interesting and varied one with this era tech
I played JKA wood till around 1985ish, starting 1960. I don't think tennis is now ess or more interesting but today it is nearly another game altogether with the use of "granny sticks," poly strings, the same size court and line placement as used in the wood racket era.
 

kevin qmto

Hall of Fame
I sold a racket locally, so you know what that means! Time to instantly replace it. This time I heard a calling from planet Pro Kennex in the form of the Graphite Jupiter. I picked it up for 2 reasons. 1. dig the space paintjob. and the squares looks straight out of a breakout arcade game.

Question: I could have SWORN, there used to be a thread here about the crazy history between Kunnan Lo and their factory over in Thailand in the 90's? Like some sort of criminal operation was happening under their nose there, and the end result was them shutting that factory down? Or at least no longer producing rackets there.

Frame notes: 92in head, wide contour, which I don't think is the same as widebody but correct me if I'm wrong. Constant beam, no huge taper like the Destiny or Presence. Haven't put it on the scale yet, strings feel reasonably tight. 14x18 string pattern, hope I like it more than the Prince Power Pro.

HYp2PBh.jpg

H97mytO.jpg

7GrNzaH.jpg

HEVaTKr.jpg

pft7D9P.jpg

pbWO0Ms.jpg

rLGBnqd.jpg

xzvwb1J.jpg
 
Last edited:

vsbabolat

G.O.A.T.
I sold a racket locally, so you know what that means! Time to instantly replace it. This time I heard a calling from planet Pro Kennex in the form of the Graphite Jupiter. I picked it up for 2 reasons. 1. dig the space paintjob. and the squares looks straight out of a breakout arcade game.

Question: I could have SWORN, there used to be a thread here about the crazy history between Kunnan Lo and their factory over in Thailand in the 90's? Like some sort of criminal operation was happening under their nose there, and the end result was them shutting that factory down?

Frame notes: 92in head, wide contour, which I don't think is the same as widebody but correct me if I'm wrong. Constant beam, no huge taper like the Destiny or Presence. Haven't put it on the scale yet, strings feel reasonably tight. 14x18 string pattern, hope I like it more than the Prince Power Pro.

HYp2PBh.jpg

H97mytO.jpg

7GrNzaH.jpg

HEVaTKr.jpg

pft7D9P.jpg

pbWO0Ms.jpg

rLGBnqd.jpg

xzvwb1J.jpg
I know a lot of Prince rackets were made in that factory in Thailand
 

graycrait

Legend
@kevin qmto ,

 

kevin qmto

Hall of Fame
Ah. Yes the water tanker filled with black market pro kennex rackets story lol. Hope it’s true, would love to find a news article about that.
 

kevin qmto

Hall of Fame
What is the 'wide contour' on that? Looks around 22mm?
Good eye lol! By my tape measure, it’s either 22 or maybe 23mm at the very most.

I got around to putting it on the scale. Man this is a hefty beast. Weighing in at 374g strung, it’s my new heaviest graphite frame I’ve ever owned according to my list. Only things I own that weigh more are prince woodies and the Rawlings tie breaker, which is metal of course.
 

Bambooman

Hall of Fame
I will say that the Wilson Hammer 5.0 Stretch that I mentioned a few posts back seems to be my holy grail find so far.

Wasn't really expecting that. It's the first racquet that I've found that seems to have it all. And that's playing with it with the strings that were on it, no doubt for years.
 

TSElliott

New User
Found a Wilson Sting 95 HB in a Goodwill for $5.99. It's in pristine condition overall with just some wear. It also has the original leather grip and nylon strings. Was hesitating whether to get this because of the grip size being 4 5/8, which is much larger than what I normally use at a 4 1/4 (My actual grip size is 4 1/2), but I just couldn't place it back. Any thoughts on what I should do with this? Strings? Replace Grip? etc. Also anyone know a racket brand called ReD? There was another racquet that was silver outside, red inside, and had a crossbar like the Sting and like the Prince graphite, 16x18 pattern. It also had lettering on it in the Cyrillic alphabet.

Ozo6beK.jpeg
AA3ij3P.jpeg
FNVABmK.jpeg
Z4ngn0T.jpeg
xCVajDo.jpeg
 

kevin qmto

Hall of Fame
You certainly don't see many of the mid cycle Sting's. Lots of the early ones, maybe some crossbar-less SC's from time to time, but not those 95's.
 

Grafil Injection

Hall of Fame
In that good condition, I would be loath to change the grip or strings, and just keep it as is. But if you really like the way it hits and want to use it regularly, then you should be able to carefully remove the leather grip, keep it, and use a single overgrip to get the size down to about a 3. I have a Sz5 MAX 200G with a single Kirschbaum Touch It (0.5mm) that equates to about a Sz3.5, and a PS85 Sz5 with just a 0.4mm Pro Overgrip Sensation, that actually feels fine despite being so close to the bare handle. I think the Wilson squarish grip works well for such reductions. Strings, best to check that the grommets are robust before replacing them. Similar syngut will probably play best.
 

Grafil Injection

Hall of Fame
@Grafil Injection

That is an example of an early wide body control frame. It is a clone of the Prince design that was out at the time.
A Pro Staff were around 18 mm so an frame with that non box beam shape had different playing characteristics.
Yes, at first I thought it was an early 90s design, but now given the weight Kevin mentioned, I guess it must be a mid-late-80s and hence one of the first wider models. Looking forward to the play-test.
 

kevin qmto

Hall of Fame
DISCLAIMER - I didn't buy this, just posting it here because this seems to be the best ongoing popular thread to ask historical related questions!

Anyone know what the deal with this specific Pro Kennex Destiny is? Called the HR Destiny, and there's a signature attached of someone who's initials are H.R. , but I can't make it out. It has a unique paint job, a Technifibre grip with the factory seal still on it, and a butt cap with no country of origin or Pro Kennex corp wording on it, unlike normal PK rackets of the time. Ideas?

Y2sOlJe.jpg

yAjD12e.jpg

nMm8CZo.jpg

RCcyMQK.jpg
 

d-quik

Hall of Fame
DISCLAIMER - I didn't buy this, just posting it here because this seems to be the best ongoing popular thread to ask historical related questions!

Anyone know what the deal with this specific Pro Kennex Destiny is? Called the HR Destiny, and there's a signature attached of someone who's initials are H.R. , but I can't make it out. It has a unique paint job, a Technifibre grip with the factory seal still on it, and a butt cap with no country of origin or Pro Kennex corp wording on it, unlike normal PK rackets of the time. Ideas?

Y2sOlJe.jpg

yAjD12e.jpg

nMm8CZo.jpg

RCcyMQK.jpg
That is Hete Rampras' early racquets during his prep school days.
 

Sanglier

Professional
If you toss "Jri ki Pi lid" into google translate and let the robot detect the language, it comes back with "the best judge" in Haitian creole.

So, clearly an SMU for the Hatian judicial market. :)
 

5sets

Hall of Fame
I have one of these in a teal green color. I read somewhere in these forums that this mold was sold to Babolat.
 
Top