OK agree to disagree. Been a while since I watched it. Likewise btw I'd say Nadal started dropping the ball short in 2013 allowing Djokovic to tee off. Neither were perfect from the winner...
Regardless Nadal has a ton of better wins in slams than the USO 2013 final.
Nah, for me USO 2013 was one of his best ever wins. With that win he:
1. Got revenge for USO 2011 final.
2. Won Montreal, Cincinnati and USO back to back.
3. Officially became the best player of 2013.
4. Got close to returning to #1 spot.
5. Made one of the most exciting comebacks of his career in the third set. I still have no idea how he won that set, he had to be extremely clutch at the end.
6. The only time I remember someone managed to break Djokovic's mentality. (only for one set, but still)
7. That was one of his best wins given that he only dropped his serve 4 times during the whole tournament.
8. Showed that when he is close to his best he can beat Djokovic.
9. As we found out later, that was the last slam he won in his prime.
So yes, that was a big win. Now what arguments are there to put RG 2011 win above it? Federer saved him by taking Djokovic out, otherwise Nadal's 2011 would have been an even bigger disaster. (even with RG he won only 3 titles in 2011, one of which is a 500 tournament. It's beyond me how anyone can claim Nadal had a good year, leave alone a great one in 2011. Djokovic is getting bashed for his 2013 season where he won 7 titles including a slam, WTF and 3 masters tournaments)