Best match of 2010-2019 is...

Greatest match of decade?

  • 2011 USO, Fedovic

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2012 OLYMPICS, Fedelpotro

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2014 AO, Djokorinka

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2014 WIM, Fedovic

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    135

StrongRule

Talk Tennis Guru
Imo Nadal played fantastically in the 2011 FO final. Some of my fav rallies ever in that match
Lol, stop it. He was missing easy shots all the time but somehow got away with it. There is no way he would have won more than 1 set if that was a final against Djokovic, just no way. IMO 2011 was his second weakest RG win after 2014.
 

Gazelle

G.O.A.T.
Djokovic was outshined by Nadal off the ground in that 2018 match. It was his serve that saved him. In 2012, they went toe to toe off the ground in an insane battle and I definitely don't agree about the quality in 2018 being much higher.

Objectively 2012 was probably higher quality, given that both players were still in their prime. But 2018 was for me far much enjoyable, one of my favourite Djokodal matches.
 

MichaelNadal

Bionic Poster
Lol, stop it. He was missing easy shots all the time but somehow got away with it. There is no way he would have won more than 1 set if that was a final against Djokovic, just no way. IMO 2011 was his second weakest RG win after 2014.

Don't agree at all, and I've said for years Djokovic wouldn't have won that final. You need to watch the match again.
 

StrongRule

Talk Tennis Guru
Don't agree at all, and I've said for years Djokovic wouldn't have won that final. You need to watch the match again.
I watched it enough times. Nadal had a mental block against Djokovic in 2011 and because of that he played very bad (by his standards) in RG 2011 in general. Djokovic would have won the final in 3-4 sets, I don't see even one reason to think otherwise. Djokovic was at his absolute best and Nadal was with a mental block. Saying Nadal would have beaten him is just the same thing as saying Federer would have beaten Nadal in RG 2009 final. Federer saved Nadal in RG 2011.
 

NatF

Bionic Poster
He called AO 2012 final the best match of the decade though. A match where there was not even 1 great rally which is remembered for a long time. (even USO 2011 final had 2 such rallies)

What does that have to do with Mikes question?

No, none of those matches were "clearly" supeiror to the USO 2013 final.

The USO 2013 final is the best 4 sets match of the decade.

Maybe if that was the only 4 set match you watched...

I don't know why I'm even entertaining you at this point but occasionally posters like you need to be sat down. Even setting aside that the best 4-set match would hardly have a 6-2 and 6-1 set in it the play was very uneven...

From some independent viewers;

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2013/sep/09/us-open-finals-2013-nadal-djokovic-live

It's 11-4 on unforced errors to start the game, and then 2-0 for the moment on points won at the net when Djokovic fails to put away an overhead and Nadal gets to the net for another flicked winner. Nadal then gets to 0-30 – Djokovic is trying to force things but isn't looking fresh or energetic enough to do it properly.

Set point, then: second serve but Djokovic goes long and it's done.

Is Djokovic too tired, and thus playing with unaggressive aggression?

Bit of work for Djokovic to do – Nadal won the set 6-2, because Djokovic won the unforced errors 14-4.

Djokovic goes long from the baseline – I've lost count now, although I'm sure the statistics chaps won't have done so – but he has made 40 unforced errors to 17.

Djokovic needs great things now, so he starts this game, naturally enough, with a great little drop shot at the net. And continues with another cheeky drop shot straight at Nadal, and it dies at the Spaniard's feet. He finds the net for 30-15, though. And goes long with an ambitious attempt at a winner: 30-all, and ooh-err it is. And misses left on the backhand and it's breakpoint for 1-5, which would be the point of no return – you'd think.

Second serve… and he misses the winner past Nadal at the net and I think we're nearly done here.


They also have off-days, which is what Djokovic had here – even his second-set win was slightly despite himself, or seemed it, and his error count was off the scale...

Just a few from that live commentary.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/t...-2013-Rafael-Nadal-v-Novak-Djokovic-live.html

Just one from here on the last set...

Djokovic's unforced error has gone through the roof in the past half-hour. A lazy long forehand is his 51st, and the fight is draining from the man...

Best 4 set match of the decade, pfffft.[/QUOTE]
 

NatF

Bionic Poster
The semifinal yes, but the final? You should not just look at how Nadal's opponents play but at Nadal's level too. Nadal in USO 2013 played clearly better than in RG 2011. It was pretty bad from Federer to lose to a very average Nadal in that final.

I thought Nadal played well in 2011 once he got the momentum. Three competitive sets versus two, with Federer clearly better than Djokovic. It's clear for me which match was better
 

StrongRule

Talk Tennis Guru
I thought Nadal played well in 2011 once he got the momentum. Three competitive sets versus two, with Federer clearly better than Djokovic. It's clear for me which match was better
Nadal being far from his best is actually the reason why it was so competitive. Federer fans like to talk about that first set where Federer was 5-2 up, but they never mention Nadal getting tight while being up a break (twice) in the second set and Nadal losing the third set from a break up. Federer was ready to give up after the first set, but Nadal let him back into the match.
 

NatF

Bionic Poster
Nadal being far from his best is actually the reason why it was so competitive. Federer fans like to talk about that first set where Federer was 5-2 up, but they never mention Nadal getting tight while being up a break (twice) in the second set and Nadal losing the third set from a break up. Federer was ready to give up after the first set, but Nadal let him back into the match.

OK agree to disagree. Been a while since I watched it. Likewise btw I'd say Nadal started dropping the ball short in 2013 allowing Djokovic to tee off. Neither were perfect from the winner...

Regardless Nadal has a ton of better wins in slams than the USO 2013 final.
 

MichaelNadal

Bionic Poster
Nadal being far from his best is actually the reason why it was so competitive. Federer fans like to talk about that first set where Federer was 5-2 up, but they never mention Nadal getting tight while being up a break (twice) in the second set and Nadal losing the third set from a break up. Federer was ready to give up after the first set, but Nadal let him back into the match.

Bruh, Nadal was killing the ball by the time the final was played. It's a bit silly to say Fed could beat Novak on clay (after ALSO losing to his last 3 matches to Djokovic) and Nadal couldn't do the same on HIS court. If Fed did it, Nadal could too, and ended up winning the tournament, Djokovic couldn't even get there.
 

JoelSandwich

Hall of Fame
My two favorites are Djokovic Wawrinka 2013 4R and Fed djoker FO 2011
Djokovic Nadal Wimbledon is up there too but I need to rewatch it
I don’t really care about drama or historical significance
Quality of the match is most important to me
What was the most fun to watch
I’m not gonna rewatch a match cus of a bad call or a tantrum I’m prob gonna rewatch it cus both players played well but I def understand how that stuff can add to it
 

StrongRule

Talk Tennis Guru
Bruh, Nadal was killing the ball by the time the final was played. It's a bit silly to say Fed could beat Novak on clay (after ALSO losing to his last 3 matches to Djokovic) and Nadal couldn't do the same on HIS court.
Not silly at all. Nadal was totally destroyed when he met Djokovic in Madrid and Rome, their hardcourt matches were actually closer. A big reason (not the only one, but a VERY big one) why Federer won that RG semifinal is thanks to his big serve which saved him so many times in tight moments, especially on break points. Without that serve Djokovic would have destroyed him, because he obviously had the advantage in long rallies over a 30 years old Federer. Nadal's weak serve would be much easier to return. Nadal in 2011 had no weapons and no mentality to beat Djokovic anywhere. I don't understand how can you say that Nadal who lost a set to Federer from a break up and was close to losing another set from 2 breaks up would have won against the best ever version of Djokovic who already destroyed his mentality. Yes, Nadal in general is a better player than Federer on clay, but tennis doesn't work that way. Soderling beat Nadal in RG 2009, it doesn't mean Federer (who is a better player than Soderling) would do the same thing.

I would definitely give 2012 Nadal (and many other versions) very good chances against 2011 Djokovic in RG, but not to 2011 Nadal.
 

StrongRule

Talk Tennis Guru
OK agree to disagree. Been a while since I watched it. Likewise btw I'd say Nadal started dropping the ball short in 2013 allowing Djokovic to tee off. Neither were perfect from the winner...

Regardless Nadal has a ton of better wins in slams than the USO 2013 final.
Nah, for me USO 2013 was one of his best ever wins. With that win he:
1. Got revenge for USO 2011 final.
2. Won Montreal, Cincinnati and USO back to back.
3. Officially became the best player of 2013.
4. Got close to returning to #1 spot.
5. Made one of the most exciting comebacks of his career in the third set. I still have no idea how he won that set, he had to be extremely clutch at the end.
6. The only time I remember someone managed to break Djokovic's mentality. (only for one set, but still)
7. That was one of his best wins given that he only dropped his serve 4 times during the whole tournament.
8. Showed that when he is close to his best he can beat Djokovic.
9. As we found out later, that was the last slam he won in his prime.

So yes, that was a big win. Now what arguments are there to put RG 2011 win above it? Federer saved him by taking Djokovic out, otherwise Nadal's 2011 would have been an even bigger disaster. (even with RG he won only 3 titles in 2011, one of which is a 500 tournament. It's beyond me how anyone can claim Nadal had a good year, leave alone a great one in 2011. Djokovic is getting bashed for his 2013 season where he won 7 titles including a slam, WTF and 3 masters tournaments)
 

NatF

Bionic Poster
Nah, for me USO 2013 was one of his best ever wins. With that win he:
1. Got revenge for USO 2011 final.
2. Won Montreal, Cincinnati and USO back to back.
3. Officially became the best player of 2013.
4. Got close to returning to #1 spot.
5. Made one of the most exciting comebacks of his career in the third set. I still have no idea how he won that set, he had to be extremely clutch at the end.
6. The only time I remember someone managed to break Djokovic's mentality. (only for one set, but still)
7. That was one of his best wins given that he only dropped his serve 4 times during the whole tournament.
8. Showed that when he is close to his best he can beat Djokovic.
9. As we found out later, that was the last slam he won in his prime.

So yes, that was a big win. Now what arguments are there to put RG 2011 win above it? Federer saved him by taking Djokovic out, otherwise Nadal's 2011 would have been an even bigger disaster. (even with RG he won only 3 titles in 2011, one of which is a 500 tournament. It's beyond me how anyone can claim Nadal had a good year, leave alone a great one in 2011. Djokovic is getting bashed for his 2013 season where he won 7 titles including a slam, WTF and 3 masters tournaments)

I meant level of play wise rather than legacy.
 

Sport

G.O.A.T.
Nah, for me USO 2013 was one of his best ever wins. With that win he:
1. Got revenge for USO 2011 final.
2. Won Montreal, Cincinnati and USO back to back.
3. Officially became the best player of 2013.
4. Got close to returning to #1 spot.
5. Made one of the most exciting comebacks of his career in the third set. I still have no idea how he won that set, he had to be extremely clutch at the end.
6. The only time I remember someone managed to break Djokovic's mentality. (only for one set, but still)
7. That was one of his best wins given that he only dropped his serve 4 times during the whole tournament.
8. Showed that when he is close to his best he can beat Djokovic.
9. As we found out later, that was the last slam he won in his prime.

So yes, that was a big win. Now what arguments are there to put RG 2011 win above it? Federer saved him by taking Djokovic out, otherwise Nadal's 2011 would have been an even bigger disaster. (even with RG he won only 3 titles in 2011, one of which is a 500 tournament. It's beyond me how anyone can claim Nadal had a good year, leave alone a great one in 2011. Djokovic is getting bashed for his 2013 season where he won 7 titles including a slam, WTF and 3 masters tournaments)
Well said.
 

KINGROGER

G.O.A.T.
The semifinal yes, but the final? You should not just look at how Nadal's opponents play but at Nadal's level too. Nadal in USO 2013 played clearly better than in RG 2011. It was pretty bad from Federer to lose to a very average Nadal in that final.
How was Nadal average in RG 2011 final? After going 5-2 his retrievals were unbelievable.
 

StrongRule

Talk Tennis Guru
How was Nadal average in RG 2011 final? After going 5-2 his retrievals were unbelievable.
He lost the third set from a break up and almost lost the second set from 2 breaks up. Just watch what errors Nadal made while serving for the second set. He was clearly below his best.
 

StrongRule

Talk Tennis Guru
He is just so negative about Nadal and he is meant to be a fan....
Maybe I just can admit that Nadal didn't play great every time when he won? His level in RG 2009 (which he lost) was actually higher than in RG 2011 where he was pushed to 5 sets by Isner and had to save 8 setpoints against Andujar. Federer saved Nadal in this tournament by taking Djokovic out for him. Nadal was very average in the final, just watch what errors he was doing while serving for the second set. Federer just failed to take advantage of that, that's his problems.
 

RS

Bionic Poster
Maybe I just can admit that Nadal didn't play great every time when he won? His level in RG 2009 (which he lost) was actually higher than in RG 2011 where he was pushed to 5 sets by Isner and had to save 8 setpoints against Andujar. Federer saved Nadal in this tournament by taking Djokovic out for him. Nadal was very average in the final, just watch what errors he was doing while serving for the second set. Federer just failed to take advantage of that, that's his problems.
Nobody said RG11 was Nadal at his best it was relatively weak for his winning RGs. He still showed good form in the late rounds even if he was worse early on.
Your still supposed to be a fan yet you speak so negatively about Nadal.
 

Sport

G.O.A.T.
Maybe I just can admit that Nadal didn't play great every time when he won? His level in RG 2009 (which he lost) was actually higher than in RG 2011 where he was pushed to 5 sets by Isner and had to save 8 setpoints against Andujar. Federer saved Nadal in this tournament by taking Djokovic out for him. Nadal was very average in the final, just watch what errors he was doing while serving for the second set. Federer just failed to take advantage of that, that's his problems.
True.
 

StrongRule

Talk Tennis Guru
Nobody said RG11 was Nadal at his best it was relatively weak for his winning RGs. He still showed good form in the late rounds even if he was worse early on.
Your still supposed to be a fan yet you speak so negatively about Nadal.
USO 2013 was still many times better. He won RG 2011 only thanks to Federer taking out Djokovic for him, he was lucky and still barely won. In USO 2013 he didn't need luck, he was ready to face any opponent in the draw. It's pretty funny that Federer fans bring his USO 2013 win down even more than Djokovic fans do. It's just a common idea on this forum that all Nadal's USO wins are due to luck, cakewalk draws and opponents playing terrible tennis. In RG they already accepted that he is the best, in USO they can't accept Nadal winning anything.
 

Sport

G.O.A.T.
USO 2013 was still many times better. He won RG 2011 only thanks to Federer taking out Djokovic for him, he was lucky and still barely won. In USO 2013 he didn't need luck, he was ready to face any opponent in the draw. It's pretty funny that Federer fans bring his USO 2013 win down even more than Djokovic fans do. It's some crazy idea on this forum that "all Nadal's USO wins are thanks to luck, cakewalk draws and his opponents being terrible".
It is frustration because Federer never was able to defeat Djokovic at the US Open in the 2010s decade, despite having faced him 3 times. So if Federer wasn't able to do it, let us dismiss Nadal's achievements.
 

RS

Bionic Poster
USO 2013 was still many times better. He won RG 2011 only thanks to Federer taking out Djokovic for him, he was lucky and still barely won. In USO 2013 he didn't need luck, he was ready to face any opponent in the draw. It's pretty funny that Federer fans bring his USO 2013 win down even more than Djokovic fans do. It's some crazy idea on this forum that "all Nadal's USO wins are thanks to luck, cakewalk draws and his opponents being terrible".
I didn’t mention if it was better or worse than USO 2013 in that bit. And why the rant below it? Federer fans have been known for lots sure I agree with that but here it’s not been the worse bashing.
Nadal was helped by no Djokovic in RG11 but it was still a good draw with Isner,Soderling,Murray,Federer and he cane through it.
Nadal draw this year was not a cakewalk due to the fight Med put up for sure but that’s a different thing......
I disagree with Nadal just barely edging out Federer. He sticked him in the last set. Fed could have easily won 2 of the first 3 though.
 

StrongRule

Talk Tennis Guru
It is frustration because Federer never was able to defeat Djokovic at the US Open in the 2010s decade, despite having faced him 3 times. So if Federer wasn't able to do it, let us dismiss Nadal's achievements.
To be honest it doesn't really matter what they think. For many Nadal fans USO 2013 will remain as one of his best wins, if not the best one.
 

Wynter

Legend
Djokovic Del Potro 2013
Kyrgios Federer Miami 2017
Fognini Rafa USO 2015

All arguably MotY contenders when they were played yet somehow don't make the list of the decades greatest matches

Anyways 2013 Djokorinka is probably the best match of the decade in terms of pure insanity with the Wimbledon match a close #2 :unsure:
 

maratha_warrior

Hall of Fame
2013 Djoker Wawrinka .

Wawrinka won 1st set and was leading 5-2 in 2nd set .
Novak displayed his greatest Defence -attack capabilities to win 2nd and 3rd set and made one of the best comebacks .

4 & 5 sets were brutal boxing rallies . It was nail biting till the very end .
Match point is one of GOAT point. :love:
 
@NatF Still a better match than the RG 2011 semifinal for me. Anyhow, you are a Nadal hater, so of course you will try to denigrate that match.

The excuse "Djokovic was not at his best" is because you are incapable of being objective with Nadal. You will say that "Nadal was at his best" in the USO 2011 final, but Djokovic "was not at his best" in the USO 2010 and USO 2013 finals.

If Djokovic defeats Nadal, Nadal is at his best. If Nadal defeats Djokovic, Djokovic is supposedly not at his best. Double standard, and an excuse to make peak Djokovic look unbeatable. Djokovic is only at his peak if he wins. Excuses. No one is unbeatable regardless of his level.
Why don't you get it?
According to djok fans,

Djok wins over fedal > Djok crushed peak Fedal
Fedal win over djok > Djok wasn't at his best/motivated..


Though I can say 2013 USO final was a complete garbage performance from novak.. 6-2 6-4 6-1 were the sets rafa won which should not have happened usually.
 
Man, was really looking forward to opening this thread and reading 4 pages worth of opinions on what peoples favourite matches of the decade were.

Oh, no, of course it's just another thread devolved into a dick measuring contest. :rolleyes:

What did I just read?!!
 

Hnefi

Semi-Pro
Out of all of these ones, I'm going Djokowrinka AO 2013. That match was, just insane. 5 sets, 12-10, Djokovic's mental toughness was crazy to weather the storm from being down 1-6 2-5. Wawrinka's groundstrokes were just sledgehammers from both sides. Both guys served very well, a lot of clutch outcomes on big points. The fourth set tiebreak was just mental, I was standing up and screaming my head off after some of Wawrinka's winners.

Honestly couldn't pick a winner. It was a shame someone had to lose that one.

The only other match from the choices given which I'd put on the same level was Djokodal RG 2013. Fedovic W'19 should not be on the list, the level of tennis was significantly below the Fedal SF, and all other WIM matches on this list by an order of magnitude.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
Why don't you get it?
According to djok fans,

Djok wins over fedal > Djok crushed peak Fedal
Fedal win over djok > Djok wasn't at his best/motivated..


Though I can say 2013 USO final was a complete garbage performance from novak.. 6-2 6-4 6-1 were the sets rafa won which should not have happened usually.
Just like Wimb 2011 final was a garbage performance by Rafa.
 

StrongRule

Talk Tennis Guru
Djokovic Del Potro 2013
Kyrgios Federer Miami 2017
Fognini Rafa USO 2015

All arguably MotY contenders when they were played yet somehow don't make the list of the decades greatest matches

Anyways 2013 Djokorinka is probably the best match of the decade in terms of pure insanity with the Wimbledon match a close #2 :unsure:
200.webp


Yeah, 2015 season was definitely a party for Nadal haters, when Nadal was at his absolute worst. I can also call Djokovic-Melzer in RG 2010 or Federer-Millman in USO 2018, or Federer-Dimitrov in USO 2019 the best matches of the decade, you know.
 

StrongRule

Talk Tennis Guru
Why don't you get it?
According to djok fans,

Djok wins over fedal > Djok crushed peak Fedal
Fedal win over djok > Djok wasn't at his best/motivated..


Though I can say 2013 USO final was a complete garbage performance from novak.. 6-2 6-4 6-1 were the sets rafa won which should not have happened usually.
But Djokovic winning his sets 6-2 6-4 6-1 in USO 2011 final was totally fine. :rolleyes:
 
I'm honestly tired that Djokovic gets full credit for beating any version of Nadal (including the worst ever Nadal in RG 2015), yet when Nadal beats Djokovic there are endless excuses from both Federer and Djokovic fans.
What I said had a meaning that nadal wasn't at his best in USO11...
Not sure why you're generalizing me
 

StrongRule

Talk Tennis Guru
What I said had a meaning that nadal wasn't at his best in USO11...
Not sure why you're generalizing me
Yeah, but nobody ever mentions that. On the other hand, it is often discussed that Djokovic was absolutely terrible in USO 2013 final, even though he was very good in the second and third sets.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
Yeah, but nobody ever mentions that. On the other hand, it is often discussed that Djokovic was absolutely terrible in USO 2013 final, even though he was very good in the second and third sets.
The point is, Djokovic in the USO 2013 final wasn't better than other opponents from other USO editions. The only reason some claim he was is because his name is Novak Djokovic. That's it. But he wasn't better than, for example, Roddick in the USO 2006 final or Agassi in the USO 2005 final.

Just like Nadal at Wimb 2011 wasn't better than, for example, Roddick of Wimb 2004 or even Nadal himself of Wimg 2006.
 

StrongRule

Talk Tennis Guru
Well, this might be proof that there are more Fed fans than Nadal fans on this forum, otherwise RG 2013 would be the one catching up.
I don't remember many Nadal fans ever saying RG 2013 semifinal was a great match. Only the fifth set was high quality because of Nadal's winners. However, if Nadal didn't have mental problems against Djokovic there would never be a fifth set in this match. I would never forgive Nadal if he lost this match after that fourth set. Never.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
I don't remember many Nadal fans ever saying RG 2013 semifinal was a great match. Only the fifth set was high quality because of Nadal's winners. However, if Nadal didn't have mental problems against Djokovic there would never be a fifth set in this match. I would never forgive Nadal if he lost that one after that fourth set. Never.
Well, that's exactly how I feel about Fed after Wimb 2019. I am never going to forgive him for this loss and I am not going to just obey to sayings like "sh*t happens" when this sh*t only happens to him.

And a slam won against a sea of mugs still won't cleanse the wounds. Only a slam won against Djokovic or Nadal might.
 

ForumMember

Hall of Fame
Thanks to this thread I had an opportunity to revisit Djokovic - Wawrinka match. I recall watching later half of final set and feeling dejected on cruel loss of Wawrinnka but I had little memory of rest of the match. Probably I didn't even watch most part of the match. However after watching extended highlights of the match I would agree that given match is worthy contender of the best match of the decade. It had some of the unreal rallies with Wawrinnka unleashing power from both the wings, yes it wasn't just about his backhands. Little bummer was that it was just the R4 of slam, but still it involved reigning champion and eventual winner, so you can't discount it on relevancy factor.

Good call and thanks to thread I was able to enjoy this gem once again.
 

StrongRule

Talk Tennis Guru
What kinda ruins AO 2013 is the terrible call which happened on Wawrinka's break point in the fifth set. And let's not lie to ourselves, there is no way Djokovic couldn't see the ball was in. It wasn't even close to being out, it was right on the line and Djokovic stood near it. But he didn't say anything because the point was too important. Since then I find it funny when I hear his fans talking about Djokovic showing "fair play" on a point when he leads with 2 sets and a break or something.
 

StrongRule

Talk Tennis Guru
Well, that's exactly how I feel about Fed after Wimb 2019. I am never going to forgive him for this loss and I am not going to just obey to sayings like "sh*t happens" when this sh*t only happens to him.

And a slam won against a sea of mugs still won't cleanse the wounds. Only a slam won against Djokovic or Nadal might.
Federer recovers from losses much better than Nadal does, so he might still have chances in the future.
 
Top